00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

AllHailInsomnia just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Why ron paul rules

12,606 Views | 116 Replies

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-02-23 19:57:02


Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-02-23 20:04:14


At 4 minutes ago, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: oh yeah 18 delegates sooo close to the white house.

Whatever, if he runs as third party and takes the Conservatives who dislike Obama but are disgusted with Romney and/or think Santorum is a nut, it will help Obama getting re-elected. In that sense, go Paul.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-01 10:53:35


While this sucks to say, because I really wanted Ron Paul to win for you guys, I think Mitt Romney's gonna be the one against Obama.
Probably win too, he's as plastic as they get.


All Eyez On Me.

BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-01 18:38:43


At 7 hours ago, ClickToPlay wrote: While this sucks to say, because I really wanted Ron Paul to win for you guys, I think Mitt Romney's gonna be the one against Obama.
Probably win too, he's as plastic as they get.

;;;;
Man .....you guy's are screwed ! Obama's next competitor has already been chosen , this is literally a farcical play & no matter what any candidate does ,or how he scores vote wise the manipulators will make sure their choice gets in, as this seems to be happening & they are slipping up more & more.
Remember Bush and all the voting problems & proven irregularities in Florida ? That went no where !
This is the new normal in the USA.


Those who have only the religious opinions of others in their head & worship them. Have no room for their own thoughts & no room to contemplate anyone elses ideas either-More

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 19:58:13


You guys should register to vote if you can.

Why ron paul rules


От каждого по способностям, каждому по потребностям

BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 20:33:54


At 35 minutes ago, Raab wrote: You guys should register to vote if you can.

And remember, only vote for Ron Paul if you were going to vote Republican or nothing at all.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 21:03:14


At 28 minutes ago, Camarohusky wrote:
At 35 minutes ago, Raab wrote: You guys should register to vote if you can.
And remember, only vote for Ron Paul if you were going to vote Republican or nothing at all.

like it would matter anyways the republican nomination has been pretty much decided.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 21:50:25


At 44 minutes ago, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:
At 28 minutes ago, Camarohusky wrote:
At 35 minutes ago, Raab wrote: You guys should register to vote if you can.
And remember, only vote for Ron Paul if you were going to vote Republican or nothing at all.
like it would matter anyways the republican nomination has been pretty much decided.

Exactly, so come November, remember, only vote for Ron Paul if you were going to vote Republican or nothing at all.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 22:43:08


At 52 minutes ago, Camarohusky wrote: Exactly, so come November, remember, only vote for Ron Paul if you were going to vote Republican or nothing at all.

what would that prove its either gonna be Romney or Santorum.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 23:10:37


At 26 minutes ago, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: what would that prove its either gonna be Romney or Santorum.

More votes for Paul is less votes for whomever is the Republican candidate. Less votes = less chance of them winning.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-02 23:47:36


At 35 minutes ago, Camarohusky wrote:
At 26 minutes ago, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: what would that prove its either gonna be Romney or Santorum.
More votes for Paul is less votes for whomever is the Republican candidate. Less votes = less chance of them winning.

even though it's already decided? I mean Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell of winning he barely got a fraction of votes in the last two elections he's been in.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-03 09:03:33


At 9 hours ago, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: even though it's already decided? I mean Paul doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell of winning he barely got a fraction of votes in the last two elections he's been in.

How I'm wishing gthere was a song with the word November in it so I could bludgeon you over the head with it. (I did say November earlier on)

I meant the November election. The real election. The actual election. The election where Ron Paul will run as a third party regardless of who is the Republican candidate.

In summation, NOVEMBER!!!!

I'm talking about the November General election.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-08 03:34:55


Well past super Tuesday and only 45 some delegate TO VICTORY!!

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-08 11:44:35


Consistency is not necessarily a good thing. Flexibility is what's needed sometimes.

Also, Paul doesn't believe in evolution. All of the republican candidates are anti-science as fuck.


BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-09 15:29:41


At 1 day ago, HolyKonni wrote: Consistency is not necessarily a good thing. Flexibility is what's needed sometimes.

Also, Paul doesn't believe in evolution. All of the republican candidates are anti-science as fuck.

well for one, he stated that he knows he will never be able to make ALL of the changes he wants, so he is going to start with the important ones that need to be done anyways, his goal is to cut 1 Trillion in spending in total, thats all.

and he may not believe in evolution but he keeps that to himself when he can (sort of like a voluntary don't ask don't tell). At least he believes in putting people on trial before sending them to jail.

and @Camaro, Plan B for Paul supporters isn't to not vote anyone at all, Plan B is to vote Garry Johnson, or for some supporters to vote Obama just to spite the moralists and war mongers who made his defeat possible.


ya hear about the guy who put his condom on backwards? He went.

BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-09 16:26:29


At 56 minutes ago, Iron-Hampster wrote: and @Camaro, Plan B for Paul supporters isn't to not vote anyone at all, Plan B is to vote Garry Johnson, or for some supporters to vote Obama just to spite the moralists and war mongers who made his defeat possible.

I like all of these results.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-10 00:49:52


1. Not a homophobe, say's he'll legalize gay marriage.
2. hates war but not sure if he will ever keep it illegal because of so many soldiers would be out of a job unless he made a new use for soldiers.
I don't think war should even exist.
3. I'm pretty sure he's leaning to keeping more drugs illegal.
4. He hate's abortion so obv he should totally keep that stuff illegal to people it's just wrong just either give them up for adoptions or die with the baby it would be selfish to kill a baby and not take out your life too because it's just wrong.


Myspace

Website Coming SoonPurevolume

<BR>Perfection Confection Sugar, you can use it on babies.

BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-12 12:15:17


Why Ron Paul Rules.
http://goldnews.bullionvault.com/silver_coins_030120121

You may no tbe able to eat silver or gold...but you can't argue that a one ounce silver coin today hasn't increased in value...Oh wait, technically what has happened is the fed dollar note has decreased in value.
Oh yeah, if a fed note ever ends up like a Zimbawean dollar !
No matter how many of them you have, not only will you be unable to eat them....you'll be unable to buy or trade them for anything either (unlike silver & gold ~;)
But paper does burn...so you'll at least be able to use them for heat !


Those who have only the religious opinions of others in their head & worship them. Have no room for their own thoughts & no room to contemplate anyone elses ideas either-More

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-12 16:52:47


Romney at 454 and santorum 217 gingrich is at 107 and Paul is at *scoffs* 47

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-20 10:50:02


Update on delegate count:

Mitt Romney: 521
Rick Santorum: 253
Newt Gingrich: 136
Ron Paul: LOL 50

Delegates needed to win Nomination. 1144

Great job Paul!!

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-24 08:26:03


At 3 weeks ago, pointPi wrote: Nobody rules. Nobody sucks. Nobody has value, positive or negative. Consider ideas and actions independent from their hosts, because no one is liberal, conservative, socialist, libertarian etcetera. Those labels only fit on philosophies and concepts.

You're an idiot.

Of course people can 'rule' or 'suck'. Not having an inherent value in a universe with no minds, positive or negative, doesn't negate having any value at all. People place value into other people, and this is a reflection of other things they place value in that they see in these people. That's a value, like it or not.

"No one is liberal, conservative, socialist, libertarian etcetera. Those labels only fit on philosophies and concepts" Great, you've said nothing. You've said nobody is INHERENTLY a liberal, conservative, etc. But that these are political philosophies individuals hold. And when they HOLD these philosophies they are then conservatives, socialists, liberals, libertarians etc. So...what the hell was the point of that nonsense?

I don't like to organize the whole situation in people, because then it will just turn into a 'Hero with a Thousand Faces' type of story, where the opponent always is the bad guy and always wrong simply because (s)he is the opponent. Urgh.

Sometimes that happens for some people, but other people, like myself and most people who actually have an opinion on politics, actually find reasons to vote for someone over someone else besides, "Oh I don't like him, he's got this label."


So I don't have any strong feelings for whoever you're talking about. There is no Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader, only 7 billion humans who can't cope with their population's monstrosity.

Blank Vote 2012

Great. You've reduced yourself to being useless towards bettering the world. Have fun with your nonvoting, not having a voice, not counting should anything the government do be bad, and not counting should anything it do be good. By not doing the one thing that makes you nationally "matter" you have rendered YOURSELF irrelevant. All your opinions, irrelevant. All your beliefs, irrelevant. Nobody cares because you don't even vote.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-03-24 13:05:40


Ron Paul has the right attitude towards government and his beliefs are not nearly as extreme as some claim, he would develop better alternatives to social welfare before dismantling government welfare for instance, unfortunately his fundamentalist nonsense is a huge let down. I'm all for Jesus, he was a swell kind of guy and though I can't pretend to know everything about him I'm pretty sure Jesus wouldn't hate homosexuals, he would have been reasonable and logical and realized that embryos without a nervous system cannot possibly be sapient and he would have accepted the evidence in favor of evolution. Jesus went against the religious authorities of the time, he was crucified for doing so, yet people seem to forget this. I'm not sure what's going through Ron Paul's head, maybe his political success is due to fundamentalists and he sees them as a necessary evil, or maybe he is a fundamentalist and doesn't care about the contradictions between fundamentalism and libertarian political philosophies. I hope he realizes that he is getting old, he now has a sizeable non-fundamentalist fan base and after the elections that maybe it's time to leave a more positive legacy.

At 3/24/12 08:26 AM, BigLundi wrote:
Of course people can 'rule' or 'suck'. Not having an inherent value in a universe with no minds, positive or negative, doesn't negate having any value at all.

This is true by the way, we are sapient beings, it's a fact as obvious as any scientific fact, scientific method itself needs and observer. Look up "instrumentalism", this is probably the most reasonable solution to the problem of how the way our mind interprets the world is linked to the world. It's also worth noting that our brains "are" part of the universe as much as the photons that stimulate our retinas and the objects they were emitted from or reflected off.

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-04-03 14:15:55


DELEGATE UPDATE

Romney: 572
Santorum: 272
Paul: 51

so you people honestly think he's gonna win?

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-04-03 14:31:51


At 4/3/12 02:15 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: DELEGATE UPDATE

Romney: 572
Santorum: 272
Paul: 51

so you people honestly think he's gonna win?

Who ever said they think he's going to win? Some people want him to win but that doesn't mean they think he has a chance.


The average person has only one testicle.

BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-04-06 20:37:54


At 4/6/12 05:29 PM, risbolle wrote: wtf how do u even breathe when ur this retarded

Does your momma know you're posting this crap on her computer?


BBS Signature

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-04-17 09:08:53


His delegate count is over 364+

Don't watch the news on it.

Get out and vote.


Make Love Not War

Response to Why ron paul rules 2012-04-17 09:32:34


At 4/17/12 09:08 AM, Edgehead91 wrote: His delegate count is over 364+

Don't watch the news on it.

Get out and vote.

how so? By this site he only has 67