Dear Missus Bin, what have you done to your friends?3.91 / 5.00 2,559 Views
It’s Gideon and Reed’s first escape room and it’s gonna be a blast!3.80 / 5.00 7,158 Views
Old-school parody RPG with an epic plot.3.75 / 5.00 3,113 Views
since Tom doesn't have the funds to fight if SOPA goes through, it's more likely Newgrounds will go out with a whimper rather than the expected bang.
why am i holding a candy cane <_<
At 12/25/11 12:09 PM, Zynical wrote:
A Redundant But Well-informed Prick
Incorrect, they made some small vague changes to make it look like it doesnt apply to US citizens, when in reality at the same time they made this bill "not apply to us citizens" they made it apply to all enemy combatants and terrorists. They recently declared all protesting as "low level terrorism".
Of the 10 or so sites i regularly visit, about 2-4 will definatly be blocked for a handful of user uploads (swimming around in millions, often literally) or a simple mistake, and another 4 are possibles.
Though they dont have 2 go thru court to block you, its probably possible 2 bring them 2 court (if you live in america).
I can understand notices & warnings perfectly, but shouldn't they be more busy passing bills about blocking the sites used by terrorist cells to recruit, communicate & spread propaganda?
Thanks to me...
At 12/26/11 05:52 AM, Apocalipta2 wrote: I can't BELIEVE that this sh*t reached newgrounds too... man, this is just so sad, what the hell they are doing. Government a-holes, you know what? gtfo of ng, LEAVE IT ALONE!!!! If they shut down ng that would be one of the saddest events of the year :/ T__T
I think that might start sum riots / protests.
No, I'm not trying 2 promote either.
Thanks to me...
This will probably pass eventually, we need to figure a way to make our own separate, more awesome internets somehow. Get shit going and spread the word before it hits the fan.
At 12/22/11 12:46 PM, nicoBOB2 wrote: Your monitors are assholes and the site is loaded with stolen images. The day NG gets censored is when I will be happy
I offer you a heartfelt fuck you
Wow...Despite how much I dislike the Newgrounds community, this is just a stupid butthurt response from a butthurt individual. You can call me out on my own butthurt, and that's fine because I will take FULL responsibility to being an egotistical asshole. Seriously...How about I offer a heartfelt one of the same? Sheesh...Some people...Am I right, or am I right? Sheesh...
SCREW THE SYSTEM!!! Play video games instead.My Official Art Thread! COMMENT ON IT!
At 12/25/11 07:57 PM, robidoux wrote: Looks like Canada's gonna have to burn down the white house again.
Agreed. As much as it pains me to say it, agreed. I have lost all faith in Congress, the Obama Administration, and the American people. We're letting ourselves get screwed over by our government, and apparently to the richest people, the Constitution doesn't mean jack squat to them.
SCREW THE SYSTEM!!! Play video games instead.My Official Art Thread! COMMENT ON IT!
Popping in to clear up something. (And I can't believe I'm making this as my first post after returning here)
(And by clearing up, I mean copy and pasting an explanation of the bill from a lawyer-in-training I know in my city)
To understand the background behind SOPA, you have to understand the rationale that arose to create the DMCA. This will be incredibly simplified, but don't worry about the details. Basically, back in 1996 the WIPO passed two copyright treaties, and in 1998 the US decided to pass the DMCA to implement those treaties (dealing with criminalizing infringement mechanisms) and at the same time deal with a major problem that was already beginning to arise: that of the publisher-infringer.
See, under the copyright act of 1976 (I think, I forget the year), publishers of infringing content are also liable. So, for example, Youtube would be liable for content published. Obviously, internet publishers (like ISPs, hosts, etc) didn't want this. Unlike traditional publishers they had no real ability to screen all of their customer's content, and didn't want to be obligated to do so. At the same time, getting content down was expensive and difficult; they had to sue, go to court, get an injunction- and with the rise of the internet, they might not be able to figure out WHO to sue, or even know that that person was located in a suable jurisdiction.
Hence the DMCA created a compromise. Publisher-hosts (ISPs, Youtube, even though it didn't exist yet, etc) were granted 'safe harbor' as long as they obeyed the takedown requests. The takedown requests allowed copyright holders to take down infringing content without suing or without finding out where the people who put the content up were. That saved them (and the people who put the content up) the expense and trouble of a lawsuit. And, the counter-notification process required that the person provide their full name an address so that they could theoretically be sued if it went that far.
Essentially, the DMCA created a compromise regime- it was faster, safer, cheaper, and basically more efficient for everyone. It didn't stop the copyight holders from suing- it just made it so they mostly didn't want to because this was more efficient. On the flipside, most infringers didn't get sued because their content was removed quickly. Now, to be fair, the primary objection to the DMCA regime was that by making it easier for corporations to push these takedown notices, they would start taking down material they didn't have the copyright to or for which some affirmative defense existed (like fair use), and that nobody would counter-takedown for risk of lawsuit, and so it would have a chilling effect.
Over the past 13 years, the primary issue for the copyright holders has been that the DMCA doesn't let them target hosts which are overseas. For example, say I run metube.com out of Belize. The copyright holders could send all the DMCA takedown requests they want, but my host (Belize Internet Services) doesn't give a crap about the DMCA. They won't respond to the takedown notice. And at the same time, metube.com is of course available from anywhere on the internet.
So the content holders went back to Congress, and said "Look, we need to be able to target metube.com." The way they chose to do that is SOPA. It contains a number of different provisions, but the two that are relevant here are S.102 and S.103 (they're the most important sections of the bill anyway). They allow for two different mechanisms of targeting foreign sites.
S.102 is the seizure rule. It allows the United States Attorney General to make a request to the US District Court for an order to seize the DNS of a website if:
(1) the Internet site or portion thereof is a U.S.-directed site and is used by users in the United States;
(2) the owner or operator of such Internet site is committing or facilitating the commission of criminal violations punishable under section 2318, 2319, 2319A, 2319B, or 2320, or chapter 90, of title 18, United States Code; and
(3) the Internet site would, by reason of acts described in paragraph (1), be subject to seizure in the United States in an action brought by the Attorney General if such site were a domestic Internet site.
It also allows the USAG, on receipt of this order, to 'take down' the same things as are authorized under S.103 (internet advertising and payment processing), and allows the USAG to tell search engines to delete the site from their registers.
That's so much legal chatter, but basically what it means is that the Attorney General can seize foreign sites which are committing or facilitating criminal IP infringement if those sites are targeted at US users, and would be seizeable if they're hosted in the US. The last point, (3), is actually relevant, because under 18 USC 981 and 18 USC 2323, the Attorney General can already seize websites if they're based in the United States. And it has done so in the past, and continues to do so. It's worth noting, though, that the USAG doesn't target Fanfiction.net. It doesn't target Spacebattles.com. Its primary target is actually counterfeitters- domains like nfljerseysupply.com, handbag9.com, and dvdprostore.com. A few other sites have been targeted- large torrent hosters, primarily. Given that the provision in S.102 basically mirrors the domestic seizure provision for sites outside the US, it seems unlikely that the Attorney General is going to suddenly go on a spree of seizing websites with its new powers.
S.103 is the secondary takedown power. People tend to confuse the two, feeling that anyone can get a DMCA-like takedown request to take down entire websites under SOPA, but that isn't really the case. Anyway, S.103 basically creates a DMCA mirror provision, but rather than targeting publisher-hosts, it targets payment network providers (b)(1) and internet advertising services (b)(2). Exactly the same thing, basically: a copyright holder can make a request to one of those two services, saying "This site is an open and notorious infringer of copyright". Under that section, a payment processor is required to freeze or deny transactions between the site and US customers, and an IAS is required to stop advertising to or from (i.e., stop putting advertisements on their website and taking money, and stop putting advertisements to their website on other websites) the infringing site. There is, also, a counter-takedown procedure, just like in the DMCA.
Basically, SOPA creates two primary tools: 1) It expands the seizure rule for domestic sites to foreign ones (and adds a few more powers that domestic seizures don't have, like blocking off IAS and payment processors) and 2) it creates a DMCA-like takedown procedure that IP holders can use against sites which are outside the US and therefore can't be targeted directly. The rationale here is petty simple: most payment processors (Paypal, Visa, mastercard) are based in the US, and most internet advertising services that people in the English-speaking world are likely to see are also based in the US (google, primarily).
*Breathe* Wow, that was long. I hope it helps, though?
As you can tell by the snow, I'm Canadian. Battlefield Bad Company 2 Barracks
At 12/26/11 07:02 PM, jenngra505 wrote: If SOPA Passes I'll quit the internet.
Why will I quit my favorite website Youtube will be shut down.
P.S If SOPA gets Vetoed than I might dance that I can still keep all my internet joys sort of like several other fans
More likely then not, SOPA will be defeated at some point in Congress. Although in the event that it does pass, It's almost guaranteed to be struck down in the courts as 1) A First Amendment Violation due to the non-specific language as well as 2) Possibly A Fourteenth Amendment Violation due to the lack of Due Process.
Translation: Either it's a Freedom of Speech issue or because there's no real way to fight back against it.
Everything sucks. The world is shit and there's nothing we can do about it. I've lost all hope of freedom, peace and even happiness.
This bill isn't going to pass. I can guarantee this. They would have to take down nearly every site in existance(Google and Yahoo most likely included). Also, they can't take down websites hosted outside of the U.S. anyways, and should they mistake a site hosted in another country for one that actually was, all hell would break loose.
At 12/25/11 05:54 AM, NewZombs wrote: I fkin hate china gov.(I am chinese,and they blocked youtubefacebooktwittergoogle+andeverysit ethatgotblocked. imagine living a life without facebook!)
ikr, my parents are Chinese, visited china for 1 month during summer. I go on facebook, and i see an error message. Good side: I am no longer addicted :D
wow okay i guess i'm just going to be a professional chickenfarmer or some shit
cr0mZX: norway sucks teh penor!!!!!
cr0mZX: Full of win and kittens! ^_^\
I believe that this PIPA and SOPA act is bullshit. The Goverment can't deal with it. So what? We just can't be sitting around watching TV and stuff. That's why we are stopping SOPA.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-573485 11-281/godaddy-accused-of-interfering-wi th-anti-sopa-exodus/ win!
Tom, is Newgrounds domain in GoDaddy?
...apparently it's in "register.com", then never mind.
It got worse! Corporations have planned this all along. it was they who distributed the piracy software so they could make money from it and than push SOPA and PIPA to control the internet... Full explanation here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlV_jbs5o 9s&feature=player_embedded . Remember to take out space if there's one.
If this comes to pass, then the only thing positive I can say about all of this is that I could tell my Grand kids that I lived during the Golden Age of the internet while I was their age.
This actually made me feel bad and tremble in goosebumps...
This is my new greeting once SOPA passes:
Welcome to the Stupid Ages of the Internet, where the rich are richer and the poor stayed poor!
I still like Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven Riven!
What's truly hilarious is that "SOPA" means soup in Spanish.
But still, SOPA sucks. But soup is great.
I find it impossible to take SOPA so seriously. Seriously? SOPA? As in soup?
But whatever. If it passes, it will have to be revoked because it violates free speech.
that is all, that is all
With the delay of SOPA it probably gets worse.
...and probably there will be future bills that will be way more worse than this one if we don't start to fix democracy in the US.
Read this interview with Lawrence Lessig, the lawyer that invented Creative Commons, to find out why
Yeah the government really are fuckers. Fuck them if they pass it. Im hopping the border into Canada, or I'll just look to get the IP addresses of the pirate bay.
According to Wikipedia, most of the news channels are owned by organizations that SUPPORT SOPA.
Here's a link to the list of SOPA supporters:
Here's a link to the list of news channels: