At 11/20/11 12:36 AM, EmmaVolt wrote:
The basic information was all it was needed for and it got the message across - assuming one would have even taken the time to read it.
funny you say that because your "violence" link was actually a 1989 article penned by archbishop john p. foley about how pornography and violence are running rampant throughout the media and are considered sins in the christian religion. it's almost like you just googled "pornography and violence" and clicked on the first link, which is, funnily enough, the same article which has nothing to do with your argument or this thread.
also ctrl+f'ing "porn" the wikipedia article for Sexually transmitted disease has no results. really not sure where you're going with this.
You're right! Except we aren't talking about sex in general. Pornography (along with prostitution) are basically "STD farms".
okay even if they are why do you give a shit? it sounds like you hate anyone who has to do with pornography and surely porn actors and actresses are aware of the risks, why be such a bleeding heart about it?
here are some more arguments to add to your vast repertoire emma volt:?
you see because you just googled shocking words and made them stand out in a manner which gave the illusion that you made a point