The Enchanted Cave 2
Delve into a strange cave with a seemingly endless supply of treasure, strategically choos
4.38 / 5.00 36,385 ViewsGhostbusters B.I.P.
COMPLETE edition of the interactive "choose next panel" comic
4.07 / 5.00 13,902 ViewsIt's all been said before. The simple fact is, always was, and always will be, that the vast majority of the people doing it either don't read the BBS or straight-up don't care about how many people they piss off in their pathetic quest for points.
Ergo, complaining here is pointless. Until the system itself actually changes (or until Wade finally gets off his ass and starts penalising people who abuse the system, like he said he would YEARS ago), there's nothing anyone can really do.
You know what's worse? Stupid admins that don't give a shit about a person with a golden whistle blowing shit on the portal
When I do vote, I vote fairly.
Although, my definition of "fair" may not be very fair at all.
I just kind of voted depending on the amount of effort that was put into it ,I don't really have to like all of the content but the least I can give is a respect for the time they've worked on it. I usually do it by 2-5 but 0-1 on really terrible ones ...
How those generic girly dress up games manage to barely pass with something like a 2.00 there is odd because they're almost identicle beside the themes.
Pretend not to care about anything, but be bothered by everything.
You may be fast on the roads but it's no use on the track.
ScaryPicnic made me do it.My letterboxd.
I just straight vote harshly. Simple as that.
At 11/12/11 09:07 PM, Addict wrote:
Now... let's all get along and vote five.
Egad, sir you deserve a slap on the wrist!
QOTW:
"I hate you because you never pass up and opportunity to mention that you are a "female"-Wreckr
How to review like your opinion matters
I noticed the loading screen for the madness mod says it's lading 2.7 megabites, when the file info says 600 KB.
WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?
I wish I had more blams. I've voted on a 0-1 on a ton of flash but they almost always pass. Me getting to 100 blams will a huge achievement.
I generally find that lots of websites like to upload games that lack any interesting or anything worth playing more than once. Quite frankly, anything game that passes is most likely a glorified advertisement!
And movies, I hate it when people submit movie files. Threads like this make me angry. We don't want to become a sidekick to youtube! And yet people try and let movies pass, just so they can wave around their shiny new badge and have a biased (AND EVEN MORE EFFECTIVE) vote. I even saw stolen video files be submitted once.
I tend to not B/P very much since I never fell like the portal is benefiting form me supervising it.
3DS friend code NG member list. / I talk about game design using cartoons on youtube. / My Wii U username is Bobbybroccoli.
Good luck with that. It's been discussed million times on the BBS, but nothing ever changed.
The only way that I think we can solve this problem(At least, temporarily anyway) is by convincing the admins to raise the minimum score necessary for a flash submission to pass judgment. Currently, it is 1.60/5.00. I think we should raise that score to 2.00/5.00. It may seem harsh, but I think it'll work for a while.
Besides, 1.60/5.00 is way too lenient to flash submissions that are truly terrible.
I was formerly known as "Jedi-Master."
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."--Dr. Seuss
At 11/12/11 09:07 PM, Addict wrote: Guess what my answer to your demand is, OP.
No.
My answer is a straight-up no because... it's my account. On my account, I can do anything I want. People should not get so concerned with blind voting because it's just the internet. I give everything a five, mainly for two reasons. It's the kind thing to do, and I am also helping out the authors.
You're not helping the authors. You giving them a 5 means they think they have made something perfect, since a five out of 5 is 100%. A flahs is rarely perfect, and you spewing bull about being kind just pisses me in a way you can barely understand.
You say you want ot be nice, then maybe don't act like a complete douch on the BBS. Things aren't all equal in quality, and telling someone that they do good work when they haven't is outright lying, and has a negative effect on the authors sense of achievment and work ethic, as well as the community in general.
I have voted 5 on everything since last December, and I do not plan on stopping. Good or bad, this site needs many more submissions and I am willing to go to desperate measures to provide flashes for the NG community. What I am doing might not be the most sensible thing, but in the end it sure benefits everyone.
This site doesn't need two second "test" animationsa people submit because they didn't think to make a public link to their work in the Dumping grounds. We don't need Kitty Krew flash that goes out of it's way to be a waste of space, especially when that particular flash isn't funny and is just random pictures uploaded into flash.
I like spam, and I like serious submissions. The only thing I have a problem with is stolen submissions, but other than that I believe everything has a chance. Just because an author didn't work as hard as another or put in extra effort doesn't mean they don't deserve a five. Common courtesy should apply everywhere, including even useless things that do not relate to reality at all.
Common courtesy cna be given even withotu given away stupily high scores. Write a damn review and be courteous by telling the author what you liek about their flash, and tellnig them how to improve.
Now... let's all get along and vote five.
With tihs mentality the voting system wouldn't have been established by Tom in the first place. Tom runs the website. If you're not going to adhere to how he wants his site to run, then leave, just leave.
I've always disliked you're over confident attitude Addict, but know you've proven to me that you are quite an unpleasent personality.
On another note, yes this has been discussed many times before, but change never happens unless we keep trying.
Sexism, racism, homophobia, etc...
3DS friend code NG member list. / I talk about game design using cartoons on youtube. / My Wii U username is Bobbybroccoli.
I agree with you people need to see what the heck their voting for before they rate a flash. I seen some alfull crap. It just pathiedic. I think casual users are more honest over all we don't give a crap about stats we are just looking for a laff or killing time. a flash has to be something special to earn our rating.
i vote based based on how good they are
I just go with the majority. If it's on the green I usually vote 5 and red usually 0.
At 11/12/11 09:52 PM, DarkAltair wrote: I just go with the majority. If it's on the green I usually vote 5 and red usually 0.
Green flash is no longer under judgement, just like blue and grey. Whenever I find a red flash it's already been blammed.
3DS friend code NG member list. / I talk about game design using cartoons on youtube. / My Wii U username is Bobbybroccoli.
If you want to see an awesome site check this site out
I always vote 3 because i never remotely like the content
If you can't deal with it, please contact Ambassador Pineapple
At 11/12/11 11:06 PM, Addict wrote: Yes, me giving them a five DOES mean they made something perfect.
You see, through my eyes, I believe every flash is perfect in it's own way. You getting angry at my opinion is uncalled for, I believe. You just have to face the fact that everyone in the world has a different mindset and there is virtually nothing you can do about that. Deal with it.
You have horrible judgement, deal with it. If you honestly think a flash that is made by a 2 year old which contains basic shapes moving about in a retarded way is "perfect", then it seems your judgement is worse than everyone's here. Thankfully there's something called the majority, and they didn't agree with you when they 0 voted horrible flash. Also, if everyone had a different mindset, then the majority who vote on submissions would never come to a conclusion, whether to save or to blam.
Woah man, no need to get so offended. I never lie about my opinion on a flash, I seriously think all of them are good. I really am not comprehending what you are trying to say, mainly because what I am doing has no negative effects. I am simply giving the authors a 5 because I like it, and there is not a single flash I have come across where I think they should receive a bad score.
You give the authors a 5, but if the flash passes only because of your 5 and needed 1 zero in place of that 5 to get blammed, then you're just being selfish, since you're depriving others of their blam points. And if you say that you do so because "you like it", then why not you leave this site and create your version of the Flash portal where there's no judging system, huh?
Also score isn't everything, so it won't have negative effects towards the community at all. The review system is pretty much the only thing on a flash that relates to the community.
I BEG TO DIFFER.
Apart from the Underdog of the Week, scores also determine trophies such as the Turd of the Week or whether they get a position in the daily top 5. You may have heard of the incident where some flash was 5 voted all the time and got up to the top, where Wade told others to 0 vote it.
I BEG TO DIFFER.
Oh no you don't.
In my humble opinion, I think this site does need two second test animations, because the authors could possibly be submitting them for the sake of future reference. You seem to be far too ignorant when it comes to petty things like the flash portal. Also I think we do need the Kitty Krew and what they have to offer (which is much nowadays, unfortunately). Spam submissions are part of internet & flash culture, they are not a waste of space and they are very important. If it wasn't for all the spam submissions in the past, some statwhores would not be where they are to day. All of AfroUnderscoreStud's flashes were really helpful to statwhores because they could get tons of B/P points from simple and entertaining flashes.
Now I think you're truly retarded. Two second test animations aren't even visible to the human eye sometimes, because most of the time it may be random scribbling on the stage which rapidly appear and disappear at a frame rate of 120. Also, if the author really wanted it for future reference, then he'd use the dumping grounds because they are in no risk of getting blammed there, unlike the Portal. That or the NG Mag's Alpha section, which was specifically designed for that purpose but was scrapped until the future redesign.
Also, don't try and lay authority on spam crews. You gotta admit some of them are pretty goddamn funny and this site NEEDS humor, anyways.
I don't know what your sense of humor is like, after all, different people have different mindsets. Also, the majority of them are horrible, and only a minority of them are good. Less than 1%, I can guarantee you that.
No, I am not going to let you dictate what I can & cannot do, especially on the internet.
Then why don't you keep your goddamn stupid opinion to yourself?
I believe an author can receive better and more specific feedback through what the score is. Why? Because the score represents the foundation of the flash. Low score overall, must be a bad flash. High score overall, must be a good flash.
You're just contradicting your own statement there. Just a while ago, you mentioned that scores don't matter, only reviews do. Now you're saying that scores matter as well, apparently the reason why you're voting 5? Are you retarded, or is this a special day where your brain went on a vacation?
This is basic stuff, man.
Reason being why you should vote fairly, you stupid idiot.
Hey buster, I have been able to keep my cool throughout this entire post, but now I must say it -
FUCK. YOU.
Why? Because you don't have any argument against what was presented? Pathetic, truly pathetic.
You are definitely not about to tell me that I should leave, just because we have different views on the voting system doesn't mean I am a bad person.
1 man's opinion.
My confidence gives users a good perception on me and that is just what I am to do.
You certainly aren't going to be on the perception fast-track any time soon, buster.
I am simply an optimist, don't hate.
This is not called optimism. It's called stupidity.
My personality is the equivalence of a cuddly kitten.
More like "my brain size is roughly the same of an ostrich's"
----------------------------------------
---------------
Well, there you have it.
No, we don't.
Also Bobbybroccoli, I was nice enough to go through and fix all your spelling and grammar errors, you must not be that good in language arts class I assume. Please try and do better at arguing, I find you far too easy to take down.
If you're nice enough to do that you should surely be nice enough to vote fairly and let authors know what they're doing wrong, obviously what you're not doing right now.
Have a nice day, idiot.
I think you're being overly immature by ending your argument this way.
Slint approves of me! | "This is Newgrounds.com, not Disney.com" - WadeFulp
"Sit look rub panda" - Alan Davies
At 11/13/11 04:53 AM, Addict wrote: Who are you to tell me if I have horrible judgement or not? I can say the same thing to you.
My response to your question in a nutshell.
The slogan of this website is "Everything, By Everyone". I think that has alot of meaning towards it, so in short I can do whatever the fuck I want on here because "everything by everyone".
I'd like to know why exactly they banned the N-word if the slogan meant "everything by everyone". I'd also like to know why we can't upload anything other than SWFs on the Flash Portal if it was "everything by everyone". I'd also like to know why we can't upload PNGs since the slogan says "everything by everyone". Because they don't mean literally everything, you moron! It's figurative!
Why are you informing me of obvious information. Seriously. If you really think my one single 5 vote on every submissions is going to hurt something, then you're off your fucking rocker. As said before there are plenty of people who vote five so why don't you tell them instead of me.
What does this have to do with what your original statement said? You just said that scores don't mean anything, now you want to divert the topic?
Yeah, just bring on the insults to an innocent bystander. All I am doing is enjoying my time on the portal and here you are calling me a "retard" for doing what I want. Hey Gimmick guess what? You are a retarded motherfucking homosexual deviant for voting anything else besides a five. How does it feel hmmmm?
Better than you, since I'm not the one being targeted by 2 different people.
You're such a gigantic faggot
Deal with it!
I was running out of space below and I didn't wanna continue responding to your comebacks anyway,
You do know there's something called the "Backspace" key, right?
I find you to lack happiness and basic social skills. Were you consistently abused or dropped on your head as a child? Is there some mental disorder that can possibly explain your incessant fucktard behavior? Is there any possible way that anyone on this entire goddamn planet can motivate you enough to lug your obese ass from your computer and to the nearest clinic to seek immediate help? Are you taking any medication for your schizophrenia?
No to all these questions.
find something more productive to do than judge a person on the internet about what they should vote on relating to flash movies and games. It's gotten to the point where I feel bad for your void of common sense and something must me done immediately regarding your autistic ridden posts.
I think you should be doing something more productive than 5 voting flash.
So take a breather, shut down your computer
That's what we've been telling you all along.
You'd be doing me and everyone on this forum a very large favor.
You'd be doing yourself and everyone a favor by not voting 5 on all flash.
Thank You, And Have A Wonderful Day.
Thank you, and have a wonderful day Sir!
Slint approves of me! | "This is Newgrounds.com, not Disney.com" - WadeFulp
"Sit look rub panda" - Alan Davies
Used to 5 errythang
Then I voted fairly
Now I really don't give a shit
MrPercie on Dromedary: "smug santa claus face, bringing nicieties to those he likes but shite to those he hates - which is everyone"
Sig by this dude
it always puzzles me when people talk about voting fairly on newgrounds, and encourage others to vote fairly, yet they are against the idea of voting either 5 or 0 on flash submissions.
my votes are fair if i only judge according to the quailities of flashes, and not the authors' reputation or what crews they belong to. there is nothing to stop me from giving 5's whenever i think a particular submission deserves to stay and 0's if i think it should not pass, (e.g. spam).
problem?
28/12/14 - the last day I made sense.
31/12/14 - left the forums permanently.
At 11/13/11 03:09 AM, NL-Courage wrote: ...or do you want to launch a revolution on this site (which is impossible)?
Impossible you say? I don't think so. It's definitely not impossible. It's actually very possible and very likely. You just have to look at the B/P ratio of long term members, ie; those who signed up 05 or earlier, to see that blams used to be 'THE IN THING'. Some of these earlier signed up members have massive Blam counts. But over time there has been a revolution of sorts, where now instead of Blams being 'THE IN THING', it now seems to be Saves. But with time and a little gentle persuasion this will all change back to the way it was. The good old days will return sooner or later, so why not get on the bandwagon now. Instead of looking like a butt-muncher in the eyes of 99% of Newgrounders.
Good things come to those who wait. Post your Stat Level Ups here.
Amazing Hendrix Covers and more
sig courtesy of illicit
OKLAHOMA CITY BEAT THE GRIZZLIES. TAKE THAT AUSTIN.
PSN ID: ApparatusUnearth
At 11/13/11 11:26 AM, jimbowales wrote: fived.
Thank god your voting power is lower than a potato's.
Slint approves of me! | "This is Newgrounds.com, not Disney.com" - WadeFulp
"Sit look rub panda" - Alan Davies
thats right, start voting 0on every flash
Its only rape if you say no.
Say no to rape.
At 11/12/11 11:06 PM, Addict wrote:At 11/12/11 09:35 PM, Bobbybroccoli wrote:Yes, me giving them a five DOES mean they made something perfect.At 11/12/11 09:07 PM, Addict wrote: Guess what my answer to your demand is, OP.
No.
You see, through my eyes, I believe every flash is perfect in it's own way. You getting angry at my opinion is uncalled for, I believe. You just have to face the fact that everyone in the world has a different mindset and there is virtually nothing you can do about that. Deal with it.
What I'm reading here is that you think a flash is perfect in it's own little way, and I can agree with that. What you are implying however, is that excluding that one aspect of perfection, the flash has flaws. Therefore, you contradict yourself by saying you think all flash is perfect, yet not in every way. Say each flash has 4 aspects to it. You give full 100/100 to one aspect, and that is it's perfection, yet the other aspects that contribute to the overall quality of the flash aren't perfect, therefore, the flash is not perfect, just one aspect of it.
Woah man, no need to get so offended. I never lie about my opinion on a flash, I seriously think all of them are good. I really am not comprehending what you are trying to say, mainly because what I am doing has no negative effects. I am simply giving the authors a 5 because I like it, and there is not a single flash I have come across where I think they should receive a bad score.
Sure, you can have your opinion, but I see this as a highly unlikely excuse for you just to act like a asshole on the internet that you can use to make people like me look like morons, when you have no actual arguement other than insul- oh wait. Insults don't relate to the arguement do they? That's just you trying to look like you didn't do anything wrong by acting as if the other person has brain damage.
Also score isn't everything, so it won't have negative effects towards the community at all. The review system is pretty much the only thing on a flash that relates to the community.
Just like Gimmick said, you contradict your self here.
First you say that only reviews matter, and yet when I suggest you make some contsructive reviews, you go tell me to go fuck myself, be you realise you've backed yourself into a corner. I also love how you act like you're a saint, and yet you go around throwing pointless insults that have no relation to this arguement, and then tell me I'm the idiot for responding to your post, and not go crying in my room because some big bad man called me names over the internet.
Well guess what. I don't cry when I'm having debates against people who lack any sense of morality and logic.
I BEG TO DIFFER.
In my humble opinion, I think this site does need two second test animations, because the authors could possibly be submitting them for the sake of future reference. You seem to be far too ignorant when it comes to petty things like the flash portal. Also I think we do need the Kitty Krew and what they have to offer (which is much nowadays, unfortunately). Spam submissions are part of internet & flash culture, they are not a waste of space and they are very important. If it wasn't for all the spam submissions in the past, some statwhores would not be where they are to day. All of AfroUnderscoreStud's flashes were really helpful to statwhores because they could get tons of B/P points from simple and entertaining flashes.
I disagree with tihs paragraph because by definition stat whores are people who abuse the system just to get shiny new medals on their userpage.
::
No, I am not going to let you dictate what I can & cannot do, especially on the internet.
I believe an author can receive better and more specific feedback through what the score is. Why? Because the score represents the foundation of the flash. Low score overall, must be a bad flash. High score overall, must be a good flash.
Gimmick got you here. You say it doesn't matter, but here, you say it defines a flash's quality.
Experiencing memory loss are we Addict?
Hey buster, I have been able to keep my cool throughout this entire post, but now I must say it -With this mentality the voting system wouldn't have been established by Tom in the first place. Tom runs the website. If you're not going to adhere to how he wants his site to run, then leave, just leave.
FUCK. YOU.
This is where I realized I win. you have no response to my Tom comment, so you have no where else to go but insults.
You are definitely not about to tell me that I should leave, just because we have different views on the voting system doesn't mean I am a bad person.
That's like calling a person a faggot because they like the color pink.I've always disliked your over confident attitude Addict, but know you've proven to me that you are quite an unpleasant personality.My confidence gives users a good perception on me and that is just what I am to do.
This sentence makes no sense whatsoever.
I am simply an optimist, don't hate.
I'm fine with optimists, but not ones who flail insult around for no reason.
My personality is the equivalence of a cuddly kitten.
----------------------------------------
---------------
Well, there you have it.
Also Bobbybroccoli, I was nice enough to go through and fix all your spelling and grammar errors, you must not be that good in language arts class I assume. Please try and do better at arguing, I find you far too easy to take down.
Why thank very much. I do notice that you had no trouble understanding what I was trying to say, even though my haste to respnd to your comments may have led me to make certain errors in my spelling.
I also find it funny how I think the same thing about your argueing skills.
Have a nice day, idiot.
Have a good day Mr. Optimist!
3DS friend code NG member list. / I talk about game design using cartoons on youtube. / My Wii U username is Bobbybroccoli.
At 11/13/11 06:18 PM, Bobbybroccoli wrote: I disagree with tihs paragraph because by definition stat whores are people who abuse the system just to get shiny new medals on their userpage.
Bollocks and double bollocks to this ridiculous statement. By definition a statwhore is someone who enjoys stats. It doesn't get any simpler. You are trying to make something out of nothing by making this completely wrong statement.
I am a statwhore and I have NEVER, I will repeat that, NEVER abused the NG system EVER. I have put an enormous amount of time and effort into getting the achievements I have.
And finally, just leave Addict alone, he's not the only person doing this. There's a bunch of them with broken or missing 0 and 1 buttons, including DoctorStrongbad, Venom23, Martin, squf, ixfd64. Those 5 guys got less than 20 blams between them in the last 2 weeks. And yet you carry on like Addict is solely responsible. Now you may not agree with what these guys do, nor do I, but like Addict said before, it's his account to do with what he likes, same goes for the rest of them. And you, me and a fucking army of complainers aren't going to change their minds. So give it up and stop wasting your breath.
Good things come to those who wait. Post your Stat Level Ups here.
Amazing Hendrix Covers and more
sig courtesy of illicit
This may be terrible of me, but I usually don't watch or play like 90% of the things I vote on. I instead look at the quality of the load up screen, the topic of the movie/game, and if it's from another site or not, then vote based on looking at all of that.
At 11/13/11 06:51 PM, gamejunkie wrote:At 11/13/11 06:18 PM, Bobbybroccoli wrote: I disagree with tihs paragraph because by definition stat whores are people who abuse the system just to get shiny new medals on their userpage.Bollocks and double bollocks to this ridiculous statement. By definition a statwhore is someone who enjoys stats. It doesn't get any simpler. You are trying to make something out of nothing by making this completely wrong statement.
In the context of the Newgrounds voting system in general, this is how I define a stat whore, but yes, I know not all stat whores are bad, and I'm sorry if I insulted you.
I am a statwhore and I have NEVER, I will repeat that, NEVER abused the NG system EVER. I have put an enormous amount of time and effort into getting the achievements I have.
And finally, just leave Addict alone, he's not the only person doing this. There's a bunch of them with broken or missing 0 and 1 buttons, including DoctorStrongbad, Venom23, Martin, squf, ixfd64. Those 5 guys got less than 20 blams between them in the last 2 weeks. And yet you carry on like Addict is solely responsible. Now you may not agree with what these guys do, nor do I, but like Addict said before, it's his account to do with what he likes, same goes for the rest of them. And you, me and a fucking army of complainers aren't going to change their minds. So give it up and stop wasting your breath.
Addict knew full well the consequences of posting here and saying the things he said. I know Addict isn't the only one repsonsible for the abuse of the voting system, but his arrogance and lack of manners is mostly what I'm frustrated at.
3DS friend code NG member list. / I talk about game design using cartoons on youtube. / My Wii U username is Bobbybroccoli.