Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Invincibility, because if you're immortal, you get to see everybody that you love die while you stay alive........FOREVER.

That's just depressing man.

At 10/8/11 04:37 PM, LaForge wrote: There will always be new love. imagine all the awesome relationships you could start and end if you had eternity to live. There would be much heartache, but spaced out 70-90 years. there's more joy to be had in a relationship than fear or regret.

But at the same time, if you ever found true love, you'd never have that forever. And then that's major heartbreak. After a certain point, all relations would blur anyways if you lived forever.

Major emo moment. Not cool.

At 10/8/11 04:24 PM, DarkMatter wrote: If your invincible how do you die?

Does your invincibility just get disappear when you reach 90? lol fail.

stoner grammar woot

Immortality.
I had an idea of how to do this with brain transplantation. (My brain would be put into a new body when I was at an old age and would do so for many years) But then I thought that this is not possible due to the connections required. One brain, one body.

But immortality yes. I would start a secret organisation somewhat like a cult with me being the undying leader.

Invincible. I'd then enlist in the military and become a fucking legend.

Invincibility would be so fucking epic. I'd go like "hey guy on top of huge building, want to bet EU500 I will survive this jump?".

Inmortality, i would like to keep living forever

At 10/7/11 10:48 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: You can only choose one, which would you go with?

None. There are too many possible sadistic loopholes. For example, If I choose invincibility I might get stuck in a landslide, and even though the spine snaps in half and my lower jaw got knocked off by debris, I still live somehow, and because I'm unable to make sound, I'm stuck in an unforgiving, excruciating pain for the rest of my natural lifespan.

Both.

At 10/8/11 03:04 PM, EliteReplay wrote: Invincibility would be sick

immortality means you would live forever, but you need said anything about aging, so your body would be dead, but you would be living. THE worst hell EVER.

So basically you could be walking around like a skeleton?

At 10/8/11 06:40 PM, SBB wrote:

At 10/7/11 10:48 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: You can only choose one, which would you go with?

None. There are too many possible sadistic loopholes. For example, If I choose invincibility I might get stuck in a landslide, and even though the spine snaps in half and my lower jaw got knocked off by debris, I still live somehow, and because I'm unable to make sound, I'm stuck in an unforgiving, excruciating pain for the rest of my natural lifespan.

That would be immortality.

Invincibility means nothing can stop you, except for non-disease illnesses like heart attacks.

I'm not sure if this goes with the inviniciblity part, but I would probably want to be that instead of immortal. If you were invincible, then wouldn't you also be immortal in the sense that you would be immune to every disease every made? It seems like bacteria and germs would count as an enemy that couldn't kill you. Of course, I guess you could in fact still die of old age, although I never really hear about that happening.