Most overrated film of all time.

[unconsidered]

Your opinion of course, and do your best stay calm to prevent the risk of flaming.

[Ketchemonia]

Any Steven Seagal movie made to this date.

[DannyIsOnFire]

The first Godfather. The seconds really good, I like the flashback scenes, but the first just bored me. It was a good film, but nowhere near as epic as everyone makes out.

I'm not the only one who thinks it either.

[NekoMika]

Avatar

[BlackAstral]

At 9/24/11 12:19 PM, SCTE3 wrote: Avatar

I agree on this 100%. All that movie has is just really good graphics.

[Ketchemonia]

At 9/24/11 12:18 PM, Ketchemonia wrote: Any Steven Seagal movie made to this date.

Because in every movie he is given , it just seems he doesn't play the role.
Rather he play his own, Steven Seagal. If you hadn't noticed he is pretty much they same
dude in every movie he has acted in; a burly man with a pony tail and every fighting skill
known to man. Even when he acts Russian he is still Steven Seagal.

[EDylan]

Why must people still talk about Harry Potter?

We all know the books are better.

[Bryan]

At 9/24/11 12:21 PM, BlackAstral wrote:

At 9/24/11 12:19 PM, SCTE3 wrote: Avatar

I agree on this 100%. All that movie has is just really good graphics.

I agree with this 120%, that movie had an awful story. The graphics got a bit old after 3 hours as well.

[FuckSandwich]

Inception. It's just complicated for the sake of being complicated.

[NekoMika]

At 9/24/11 12:32 PM, FuckSandwich wrote: Inception. It's just complicated for the sake of being complicated.

I found it easy to follow but yea, not too good of a movie anyways.

[HURRHURR]

At 9/24/11 12:32 PM, FuckSandwich wrote: Inception. It's just complicated for the sake of being complicated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev1Vsnf6L Gs&feature=related

[Rivergrey]

At 9/24/11 12:32 PM, FuckSandwich wrote: Inception. It's just complicated for the sake of being complicated.

Yep. Unless it goes way over the top and becomes nearly a parody of itself, these sort of stories and films make me groan from the sheer cheesiness. I mean, damn it, there's nothing inherently good about complexity.

[MrPercie]

At 9/24/11 12:29 PM, Bryan wrote:

At 9/24/11 12:21 PM, BlackAstral wrote:

At 9/24/11 12:19 PM, SCTE3 wrote: Avatar

I agree on this 100%. All that movie has is just really good graphics.

I agree with this 120%, that movie had an awful story. The graphics got a bit old after 3 hours as well.

I agree with this 125.666666666%, the movie was just for alien fuckers

[SuperSilver123]

I think it would have to Avatar. Just oversized smurfs that are attacked by the Earth Colonists.
The graphics was pretty much the only thing that made the movie good.

[pieandeggs]

At 9/24/11 12:19 PM, Travis wrote: Transformers... all of them.

Agreed.

I mean, they were cool, but not nearly as well as everyone put them out to be.

[AnalPenguinFarming]

Titanic. Still the highest selling movie in theaters of all damn time. I don't know how or why. It was a great movie. But not that great.

[StarvingGamer]

Avatar, no doubt. It was an okay movie, but it certainly wasn't anything mind blowing.

[Pjanoo]

No such thing as over-rated, people just want their opinions to matter more than others.

[Benji]

Inception had so much potential to be good, so much to build off of, but they didn't do enough with it.
I guess they needed to go deeper. I crack myself up.

[Rivergrey]

At 9/24/11 01:24 PM, Benji wrote: I guess they needed to go deeper. I crack myself up.

Any deeper and it would have been called Penetration.

[Mismo]

A Swedish movie called "Svinalängorna", everybody in Sweden seems to love it, and it also won the "guldbaggen" (Guldbaggen is like the Oscars in Sweden) for best Swedish movie, but for some reason I don't like it. I am alone in this opinion of course everybody I met that have seen it loves it, and I usually like award winning movies.

[yurgenburgen]

Pulp Fiction.

The parts that were good weren't original, and the parts that were original weren't good.

[Mismo]

At 9/24/11 01:26 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: Pulp Fiction.

The parts that were good weren't original, and the parts that were original weren't good.

None of Tarantion's movies are actually original, he steals ideas for other movies all the time. when he made Kill Bill he almost ripped off two scenes completely from one obscure cult Japanese exploit movie called "Sex and Fury".

[The-Last-Guardian]

At 9/24/11 12:15 PM, unconsidered wrote: Your opinion of course, and do your best stay calm to prevent the risk of flaming.

I thought the sixth Harry Potter film was not as wonderful as everyone else put it.

[Ketchemonia]

At 9/24/11 01:26 PM, yurgenburgen wrote: Pulp Fiction.

The parts that were good weren't original, and the parts that were original weren't good.

Then you might as well say this about every other Quentin Tarantino movie.

[Makeshift]

Fucking, every Stanley Kubrick film ever. All of them. Holy shit, get over yourselves hipsters.

[Mismo]

At 9/24/11 01:34 PM, Makeshift wrote: Fucking, every Stanley Kubrick film ever. All of them. Holy shit, get over yourselves hipsters.

How come one is a hipster for liking a Kubrick movie (me included)?

[Rallard]

At 9/24/11 01:34 PM, Makeshift wrote: Fucking, every Stanley Kubrick film ever. All of them. Holy shit, get over yourselves hipsters.

Agreed.

The Shining was okay at best, 2001: A Space Odyssey was boring as shit, and a Clockwork Orange was fucking retarded. Especially that scene when the main character comes out in his undies, only to be sack-grabbed by his psychiatrist or whatever. What was the point of that scene? To show he was sexually abused? I don't get it, the whole movie is awkward and stupid and tries way too hard to be profound.

It does have a lot of phallic imagery, though, so Newgrounds might find that appealing.

Suck my balls Stanley Kubric.

[MrPantz]

Inception. Didn't see what the big deal was

[Ryanson]

Drive is a pretty overrated movie.