OK so here will be my formula for my argument. I got the idea from ED.
First, I will open with my stance on the subject, keeping in mind to use Circular Logic the entire way through.
To this, they will likely reply with some petty insult, along with a straw man argument. If it were not for good old ED, I would probably give up right here or have some rage fit and rage quit, but thanks to good old ED, I know exactly what to do. I will simply respond to their crappy argument by copying and pasting Guy Macons original post.
This probably will not do the job, as these are some persistent bastards. So what will I do? Bring out a straw man and ad hominem argument of my own.
I will then proceed to pull stats out of my ass after using "some argue" arguments.
As I am sure none of this will cause them to admit defeat, I will simply threaten to sue them, and close off with
"Whatever. BTW you guys have slandered and libeled me. See you all in court, douchebags."
Will I win or what? (no seriously guys. I really know of no other way of arguing with these douchebags. Just ignore the laughing emoticon, as this is not a joke.)