Im back to rate yall's sigs!
Font- fairly cool, blends well.
Picture- smushed, no?
Backround- the red and black looks pretty sweet
Bottom Line- alright, I didnt like the white with black n red color scheme though
Dude1548's current sig
Font- blurry, is that the point?
Picture- very blurry, is that the point?
Backround- look above
Bottom Line- are those penguins? Kinda hard to tell...maybe I just didn't "get it".
Dude1548's other sig
Font- thin cool outline, blends great
Picture- soft, makes it cool
Backround- I love the simplicity of the colored circles
Bottom Line- good, fairly oringinal
Font- newgroundish = cool
Picture- who dosent love the logo?
Backround- looks great
Bottome Line- I liked the backround the best, that made it stick out/
Font- techy, fairly cool
Picture- none really
Backround- blends well, the edge is overly big in my opinion
Bottom Line- averge, forgetable sig
Font- Blurry, unevenly spaced
Picture- way too blurry
Backround- again, blurry
Bottom Line- blurry, eh?
Font- halo-y, a bit small though
Backround- basic BBs color, not pixilated
Bottom Line- I like the static, and I swear Ive seen this somewhere else...
Frenzy - I dont feel like rating both of them, I personally like the other one better, looks alot cooler to me.
Picture- the knight is great quality, but the sword isn't
Backround- meh, a room
Bottom Line- I think I already forgot it...
Font- fairly cool
Picture- looks 3-D, I like the glow
Backround- oi! You missed the BBS color...
Bottom Line- would have been alot better if the backround was the right color
Font- hairy, a tad blurry and pixilated
Bottom Line- the low quality turned me off
Font- good flame effect
Picture- kinda weird, scroll bar feel
Backround- BBS, love how the fire glows
Bottom Line- Cool and stands out
Font- sharp, good glare
Picture- Good quality, nice blue shades
Backround- nailed the BBS, loved the windows
Bottom Line- Oringinal and good quality
Picture- looks like a great-quality comic book
Backround- detailed and blends well
Bottom Line- Overall good sig
Font- cool, good quality
Bottome Line- Clever message, took awhile to read
Font- sticks out no?
Picture- beautiful, looks just like a painting
Backround- subtle frame
Bottom Line- reall good
RacoonMario's current sig
Picture- everything is blurry, especcially the 3D mario
Backround- again blurry
Bottome LIne- blurry, forgetable
RacoonMario's other sig
Font- blends, looks good
Picture- a tiny bit blurry
Backround- Mario-y, blends well, I like the cut-off's on the left edge
Bottom Line- kinda bland, but cooly trimed
Font- real cool
Picture- awsome paint effect, good quality
Backround- blends real well
Bottom Line- oringinal cool sig
Font- subtle, almost blends too well
Picture- good quality, nicely mirrored
Backround- cool shades of purple, gets a bit pixelated to the left
Bottom Line- real nice sig
Font- blends beautifully, great
Picture- awsome quality, love the light
Backround- one of my favorites now, colorful and very bold, great frame.
Bottom Line- amazing- great sig
Font- big and simple
Picture- good sheild symbol
Backround- BBS, good frame
Bottom Line- Oringinal, a bit too simple
Font- nice high-tech
Picture- cartoon-y, good quality and glow
Bacround- blends real well, cool shades of green
Bottom Line- the name-sig relationship is crazily high here
Font- bland and a little small
Picture- bad quality, even for old mario
Backround- again. bad quality
Bottom Line- bland and uninteresting
Font- cool, goes with rest of sig
Picture- extremely life-like
Backround- cool and grainy
Bottome Line- dave can make some awsome stuff can't he?
*looks back and counts*. Damn, that was 24 ratings!