At 2/28/05 08:57 AM, -Solo- wrote:
Sry for the absence here.
It's cool man. Don't try and push yourself. Besides, I enjoy doing ratings. :)
At 2/28/05 06:51 PM, Parralax wrote:
yeah I know, first few days with fireworks, I think i am getting the hang of it, meh. Could you rate them both any way, thanks. Yeah i am not mucking around with transperancy until i get better at things so rate away
The first one needs the proper background colour. And even with the right colour code, you can still make out squares in it. It's too plain too, needs more work. I give you a 5/10.
The second one is okay. Could use an image of some sort. It's too vacant. The animation is cool, and so is the colour. I give you a 6/10.
At 2/28/05 07:39 PM, QuikFox wrote:
It hasn't even been a week since he asked. :/
At 2/28/05 08:30 PM, Velocitom wrote:
a rating would be fit
The borders are nice, but they are a bit too big, you can't make out the background too well with all of them, but it's still pretty neat. The font is okay, could be a bit better, to suit the tech theme. The background is okay, a bit too much blending, but it's alright. I give you a 7.5/10.
At 2/28/05 10:55 PM, da_pope wrote:
Here's another sig I made for the competition at the BSM... Rate plz.
Anything you think I should change before I enter it...?
I think I've gotten much better at fireworks:
It's pretty good. The Star of David looks a bit mushed, and it doesn't fit with the pentagrams at all. The font is cool, and the background is nice too. I give you a 7.5/10.
At 2/28/05 10:58 PM, bbeastieboy wrote:
rate my shitty sig plz...lol
You should fill in those white spaces with the BBS colour, it would look better. Some text would be nice too, and that pentagram is okay, but, eh. I can't say too much about it, it's a mess. :/ I give you a 4/10.