The Fairest System For The World

[Quicksmasher]

Everyone dies.

You disagree? Give me a better one.

[Jacco]

Everyone lives?

[Quicksmasher]

At 8/9/11 08:55 AM, Jacco wrote: Everyone lives?

No, that's not fair.

[Light]

I fail to see the fairness in arbitrarily deciding that none are fit to live.

[WolfBoy300]

How about everyone lives and move on with their daily lives?

[Cubone]

this is a really insightful reply

[Quicksmasher]

At 8/9/11 09:00 AM, WolfBoy300 wrote: How about everyone lives and move on with their daily lives?

No, no, this is not as fair.

[Irrelephant]

wow thats pretty deep and poetic

[Quicksmasher]

At 8/9/11 08:59 AM, Jedi-Master wrote: I fail to see the fairness in arbitrarily deciding that none are fit to live.

You don't need to see the fairness in that decision, just try to give me something fairer than that.

There's nothing as fair. That's the fairest thing.

[Confucianism]

There is no fair system for the world. Seriously, there isnt. There is no amount of work you could show to prove otherwise. If you want to thats fine but it wont be valid.

[Asandir]

At 8/9/11 08:54 AM, Quicksmasher wrote: Everyone dies.

Everyone dies at some point.

[Lintire]

Define "fair".

If you mean "fair" as synonymous with "equality", then yes, it's definite that everyone dieing would result in the ultimate equality. Go bask in the glory of the idea, and 'ave yourself a banana or something. Give yourself a pat on the back.

But that kind of post-mortem revolving system wouldn't be supported outside of a suicidal few.

[Confucianism]

At 8/9/11 09:07 AM, Confucianism wrote: There is no fair system for the world. Seriously, there isnt. There is no amount of work you could show to prove otherwise. If you want to thats fine but it wont be valid.

Isnt someone going to try and prove me wrong?

[tox]

Select corporations and governments impliment a world war killing of lots of non esential people and raening in extreemist groups, implimenting a democracy and honor system,
Or
putting people that need to die from the previous idea, onto a ship and sending them to a new world to colonize it.

[WildWes]

Objectivism. What could possiblygo wrong?

[Confucianism]

At 8/9/11 09:20 AM, tox wrote: Select corporations and governments impliment a world war killing of lots of non esential people and raening in extreemist groups, implimenting a democracy and honor system,
Or
putting people that need to die from the previous idea, onto a ship and sending them to a new world to colonize it.

Thats still not fair......

[Soapbubble]

I disagree. Therefore it's not the fairest system for the world.

[OddCore]

There only is one System for this world.

System of a Down.

[All-American-Badass]

Feudal democracy. it would be somewhat like what the US had before the direct election of senators amendment.

[EDylan]

How is everyone living not fair? I cannot see the logic in that.

[SlapAHo]

Everyone already dies at some point, and we live in an unfair world already.So having everyone live should have a different result.

[TheSporkLord]

Nature is the only fairness.

[Malt-Shake]

Wade rapes everyone.

[Suprememessage]

Everyone suffocates while the sun explodes?

[Xarnor]

Everyone destroys all of their money and possessions, effectively resetting the entire world so that we all have a fresh equal start. I'll be personally responsible for making sure that everything is properly disposed of...

[Bantun]

No universe.
No problem.

[Bryan]

An Eye for An Eye, I say.

[Confucianism]

At 8/9/11 02:58 PM, Bryan wrote: An Eye for An Eye, I say.

Ahhh Im blind!

[ZeroAsALimit]

Quick, fire up the Hadron collider!

[Painbringer]

A system that doesn't work is not a system at all. Therefore, your logic is flawed.

The only fair system would be a worldwide benevolent dictatorship where everyone, other than the dictator, is equal and compensated.