At 8/3/11 06:12 AM, RubberTrucky wrote:
At 8/3/11 06:05 AM, ThaB00MZ0R wrote:
Rereading, Gagsy has already anticipated the remark. What is historically relevant is that still, anti-woman things remain traditionally within our laws (unequal pay) and in particular in the mind of indivuals (rapists/domestic violence), so feminism is relevant in slight ways. Not so much in the extreme cases.
*Two wrongs don't make a right. Sorry for the typo.
No, it doesn't. It just means that you shouldn't repeat the mistakes of other people. Also, very clever how you saw that it is indeed a fallacy. Too bad you didn't understand what it really meant.
Women don't get paid less. They earn less.
In the statistics, women with children, working part-time, occasionally getting pregnant are placed in the same group as men working full-time, with better paying jobs. Men have the majority of the full-time jobs, fact. Many statistics are fiddled with these days, be it not on purpose, or on purpose.
Statistics and jobs, however, are not my specialty. You may want to ask ModernPatriot about it, or read some of his news posts. He has probably already posted it on many places, though.