"Right, the whole idea of survival of the fittest and advancing a people by forcibly removing undesirable traits has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. The belief that these traits are inherited and that when those with the undesirable traits are removed from the gene pool it will improve the fitness of the entire group has no possible connection to evolutionary theory."
Work ethics are not inherited. They disliked the stereotype Jew, the banker who just sits on his ass and gets money by doing no physical work. Same thing with the other "inferior" races. They disliked the stereotype whom did not contribute in a strong physical manner to society. It's not evolution, it's Social Darwinism. And it isn't the same thing as evolution.
"You read the etymology but ignored the section on Nazi propaganda. When it comes to the Nazis, the origin is meaningless because the Nazis warped it to their own uses just like with the swastika which was originally a symbol of peace but is now associated solely with the Nazi party and the holocaust. Had you read the part on Nazi propaganda you would have seen this, a direct quote from a piece of Nazi propaganda, "Just as the night rises against the day, the light and dark are in eternal conflict. So too, is the subhuman the greatest enemy of the dominant species on earth, mankind. The subhuman is a biological creature, crafted by nature, which has hands, legs, eyes and mouth, even the semblance of a brain. Nevertheless, this terrible creature is only a partial human being." Is that proof enough for you? If not there is also this within the same part of the article, "Nazi anthropologists attempted to scientifically prove the inherent 'inferiority' of the Slavs." It's not about the Jews but the Slavs were also persecuted by the Nazis."
I can't see what you're trying to prove by saying this. It's propaganda that is trying to give none-Aryans a bad reputation. It doesn't mention anything about any reasons, excuses, or justifications. They obviously tried to gather proof of the racial inferiority of the Slavs, but they failed.
And no, the above quotes don't say jack shit about anyone using Evolution as a means of justification. It's not a matter of not doing research, the problem is that it doesn't exist.
And I didn't suggest that you said Evolution is a horrible idea, I'm saying that it would be completely retarded to call the theory bad or evil even if any of this had been true.
There are moral rules, scientifically backed up rules, and rules that the community agrees on being necessary. Anything else is oppression.
"Like I said, repeatedly, evolution was not the cause it was a justification. There is a difference between the two. I really shouldn't have to post that as many times as I have."
I meant justification, please excuse my inability to write properly.
"I did that with Smartass and E1EE7 because they repeatedly proved to be trolls. I gave them both numerous opportunities to prove that they weren't and they failed every time. If you want me to ignore you though, don't worry. You are well on your way to proving that you too are a troll given how much of what I've said you ignored. An entire link, half a wikipedia article, and your moronic claim that survival of the fittest has nothing to do with evolutionary theory are an excellent start to proving you are a troll."
No, Smartass and E1EE7 gave you proof backed up by the majority of the scientific community. Said facts suggested that your statements were incorrect. You proceeded to ignore the facts, and state that they only care about either Expelled or that the individual is "Ignoring what you're saying". I still believe that what Smartass said should be able to finish this discussion alone;
"If you can actually find something that says "Jews are slowing Evolution" in Nazi literature, please tell me. Because I have searched diligently and found nothing."
This is what it's all about. Unless the Germans went out and said "We killed the races we see as inferior because they're slowing down evolution for us", you've got no argument. Any "intellectual analyses" made in the aftermath by any scientist or historian is irrelevant.