At 7/3/11 07:53 PM, TrevorMcNally wrote:
At 7/3/11 07:42 PM, Dromedary wrote:
Army > NavyArmy is BIGGER than the Navy, but the only real way you can compare the services is by how effective they are with their funding. In this sense the Army (biggest money waster, but they have all the cool shit) loses by a LONG shot, Navy/Airforce come in 2nd and the Marines easily win (I swear to God I've got CIF issue gear that dates back to Vietnam). Anyways, nobody cares what service > the other service. It's like comparing apples and oranges and in the end we've all got the same objective.
The fuck you talkin' bout Willis?
The Army, being the bigger service, also has a larger budget. And don't tell me the Army gets all the cool shit. Have you been in and lived in an Army base? Its shit. The ammenities suck. Don't complain about your shitty gear, because if your service spent their money wiser than the Army then they'd have the same or better gear. Army logic is, "Yeah, we'll spend more money so we can have a better fighting force."
Saying the Army is the worst financially is like putting an F1 against a pick-up truck in a drag race, and saying, "Well, at least the guy in the truck saved some money!"