At 6/17/11 04:00 PM, Sinitron wrote:
At 6/16/11 05:42 PM, InZane3 wrote:
Ignore the console reviews, the ports are lousy.
At 6/16/11 10:29 AM, kiljoy96 wrote:
What do you think about the things that people are complaining about in the reviews? Are they just irrelevant, or do the issues not bother you personally?
This. I'm not in denial, I just think it's an all around great game.
At 6/16/11 10:24 AM, SloppyMoe606 wrote:
Or maybe I actually like the game dickface.
You moron, that's where the majority of sales come from: The console gamers. If we're discussing the sales figures and such, the 'fact' that the console versions are shit is a huge issue. If this is true they should have just waited a bit longer and fixed the shit.
Now, I'm not a graphics whore, coincidentally I'm also a huge Nintendo enthusiast, but the graphics on Duke Nukem Forever, from what I've seen, look like muthafuckin' Doom 3. Yeah, I said it, Doom fucking 3.
Now, you might say, "Doom three had amazing graphics for the time," and I'd say, "The fuck it did, I always thought that shit was ugly as hell. When your textures and meshes suck that much balls, it must brainwash people into thinking they rock."
In all seriousness, the Zelda games for the CDi Phillips looked better than that shit.
The afore mentioned should allow you to understand my views on the graphic quality of Duke Nukem Forever.