Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/13/11 12:02 AM, RightWingGamer wrote:

At 11/13/11 12:00 AM, naronic wrote: now how does this score dichotomy translate to sabotage?

In this case, I'd say it doesn't. But it's a nice contrast to the OBVIOUS 0-bomb of the cod games.

:0 bomb cod games

:0 bomb

and it just goes on and on and on and on and on,

At 11/13/11 12:02 AM, Travis wrote: People liked the different experience of playing as a shock trooper. They also got a unique and different challenge different than playing as Masterchief.

It also included all of the Mythic Maps if I'm not mistaken. So that's where that 20 dollars is tacked on at.

But it's still a $60 expansion pack. How is that okay for Halo to do, yet MW3 isn't even allowed to be similar to its predecessor?

At 11/13/11 04:00 AM, Travis wrote: I didn't play ODST... So I can't be sure. From what I have seen from Gameplay. It's an entirely different experience than what you are used to.

In much the same way that vanilla ice cream is entirely different from french vanilla ice cream.

I actually played that POS, and even the quote-unquote "stealth" missions can be easily breezed through with the same run-and-gun tactics you used in Halo 3. It's the same game, and Micro$oft didn't even try to hide that fact.

Hey, guys, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

At 11/13/11 05:08 AM, BenKNG wrote: Hey, guys, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Yeah, guys, stop discussing on a forum!

But really, I'm starting to forget this is a modern warfare 3 general. My mate convinced me to hire it out overnight, and frankly, the survival mode is brilliant with a friend. Could've been polished a bit more, though.

I don't see myself buying the game though. Multiplayer didn't really appeal to me, and I got tired of the campaign during the first mission.

Well since i got the game let me point out some interesting points on my opinion.
I've played the single player campaign for about 2 hours till now, it's amazing. The Single player experience is truly a gem. I haven't touched multiplayer but i'm getting itchy fingers to just click on the multiplayer icon. Sure battlefield 3 is an amazing game, but why do you hate when you can just shut up and enjoy what developers have created for us? Two amazing games that will surely be played for years to come.

At 11/13/11 05:56 AM, Greenfrost6 wrote:

At 11/13/11 05:08 AM, BenKNG wrote: Hey, guys, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Yeah, guys, stop discussing on a forum!

There not even discussing, there having a 3 page conversation between themselves. Take it to PM's or something.

Seriously though, I dont know why people are bitching. The single player is fantastic, survival mode is well made and the multiplayer "isn't bad."

Hell, can we all agree its better than black ops at least?

At 11/13/11 04:06 AM, RightWingGamer wrote: I actually played that POS, and even the quote-unquote "stealth" missions can be easily breezed through with the same run-and-gun tactics you used in Halo 3. It's the same game, and Micro$oft didn't even try to hide that fact.

Insulting Microsoft for liking money
Loves Call of Duty

Kid, I honestly wonder if you're completely brain dead sometimes.

At 11/14/11 04:25 AM, kiljoy96 wrote: Insulting Microsoft for liking money

So now this is a Micro$oft hate thread?

Meanwhile, at Microsoft games..

ya I guess its ok its not my favorite

You guys are gonna give me a brain tumor. You either like it or you don't. It's really really fucking simple.

I see this game being less judged as a game and more judged as a sequel. All I'm saying is, if this game never had a predecessor, would you bitch nearly as much? I mean, all I hear is "it's like all the other games" and never once hear anyone actually criticizing the gameplay. Seriously what the fuck?

Big whoop it's like the other games, like Halo or LoZ or TES or any other fucking game to ever have a goddamn sequel isn't like that? Have you ever played a sequeal that WASN'T similar to it's predecessor? MW3 offers a different story line, different side game (survival) and the same multiplayer with different guns, maps, etc. Halo is also like that. Different story line in each one. But the Multiplayer is the SSDD we always deal with. Skyrim is the same as Oblivion is the same as Morrowind. Some things changed but the core mechanics and how the game works never does. You still explore and kill. You still build your own character. You still do quests. They change the map, they take out or add in different skills, weapons, spells, some enemies, etc. Just like CoD or Halo adds new maps, different guns, different "perks", etc. But the core mechanics never change. And you act as if they were suppose to?

Sequels will never be what we want them to be, they will always and forever be the same game you played last year(s) with different shit. Becuase if they changed up everything, than how the fuck is that even a sequel? Like in Assassin's Creed, how in the hell is the same old insidious way of killing people any different than the last game? Sure some shit is different. New enviroments, different story line. The combat hardly changes and you still do what you did in last game in a different setting. But Ooohhh, AC is different from CoD sequels because, because....wait, it isn't. Ding ding, you win the dipshit award. All sequels are like the games before them. Expecting different is like simply expecting an entirely different game.

To put it simply, yeah. It's not anything anyone has ever seen before. Same graphics, same modes, different maps, guns, perks, pointstreaks, etc. You got a new Storyline, you got Survival mode. Wanting anything more different is just asking for another game that's not a sequel.

What I want to know is, how the fuck would you make it different? How would you save the series and change up everything? Apart from arbitrarily changing small things in the interface, or taking shots in the dark on big changes, of which, 90% would fail, there isn't anything you could do or come up with to help this series.

"Well in this Harry Potter sequel, lets have him work in a Deli Shop and use magic to help save him when he is in trouble at work. And his new best friend, John, could be the Deli's Owner who also happens to be Italian!" "Bill, sit down."

Big changes =/= Good changes Sequels are sequels. Deal with the fact they aren't different all the time.

Disclaimer: note that all aforementioned allusions to other franchises are entirely my opinion, and don't reflect nor imply anything about the similarity of the franchises' sequels to their original as fact. Also note that I am entirely entitled to my opinion in defending my position on the over critizing of a sequel for being a sequel. So try to hold back the nerd rage because I compared CoD to your favorite game or some shit.

and after many a srs post, time for a bit of this

I liek mw3 my fav gun is da m4a1 cuz its kl and kills propa fast n shit (y)
i use red dot on it cuz the holo site is 2 big 4 my pov ye? :)
almost got gold on it cant wait :D

At 11/15/11 04:20 PM, simon wrote: This is me atm.

Neat. I'm about to play my first match.

At 11/15/11 04:30 PM, simon wrote:

At 11/15/11 04:26 PM, Makeshift wrote:

At 11/15/11 04:20 PM, simon wrote: This is me atm.

Neat. I'm about to play my first match.

Have fun! Sub machine guns are your friends. ;-)

They have been throughout all Cod's except Black Ops. I'm looking forward to using them again.

Wow, I suck.

I think this is the best Cod released to date.

Why the hate?

Does anybody else think the Type 95 is ridiculously overpowered? They need to nerf that thing. Seriously. A two hit kill?

At 11/16/11 12:53 AM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote: Does anybody else think the Type 95 is ridiculously overpowered? They need to nerf that thing. Seriously. A two hit kill?

I rarely see any people use it. Also, it is the first Chinese weapon in CoD.

At 11/13/11 02:40 PM, BenKNG wrote: Hell, can we all agree its better than black ops at least?

I was able to play black ops for more than three minutes without getting bored of it. This game is fucking terrible, the only thing it has going for it is Survival/Spec ops. It's just recycled shit.

Coming from a COD fan since the first game.

At 11/15/11 04:20 PM, simon wrote: This is me atm.

Oh God. I'm closing to prestiging soon as well even though I haven't put 24 hours into the game yet.

At 11/16/11 12:53 AM, WeHaveFreshCookies wrote: Does anybody else think the Type 95 is ridiculously overpowered? They need to nerf that thing. Seriously. A two hit kill?

I haven't really noticed much with it, feels just the same as the Famas from Modern Warfare 2. The only gun I've been touching a lot is the PP90M1, which I've managed to gain the Gold Camo for it.

The FMG9 Akimbo is a bit overpowered too.

I've got gold on the Scar, ACR, and Barrett. Working on the M-14 now. Am I cool yet?

roflbump

I'm starting to notice a few technical issues. The game lags a bit and weapon damage is pretty inconsistent. Still, the game's only been out for 12 days and IW's been patching like clockwork. The problems should be fixed before you know it.

I love how you can hear people you kill. After killing this one guy he always said, "yeeeeah" like he was really pissed. Then I kill his friend and his friend goes, "AAAAAAAAAAH YOU COOOOOCK!"

Also, I'm finally starting to get really good. Playing TDM and I'm getting highest K/D constantly. I think it's because I started using Specialist. I've got a class with the MP5 at lvl 28, Sleight of Hand, Hardline, Steady Aim. Then my Specialist perks are Quickdraw, Assassin, and Scavenger. It's working well so far.

At 11/22/11 01:05 AM, Travis wrote: That'd be impressive coming from infinity ward after the month it took to fix the javelin glitch in MW2.

What matters is that it WAS fixed. The game's current state matters innumerably more than the game's past state.

Also, IW's made at least 4 patches in the last 2 weeks. That's alot. I don't think these issues will last much longer.