Considering a tattoo

[Cootie]

Of... Woodstock of course? Why Woodstock you may ask? Because Woodstock is the shit that is why.

I am about to be 17 years old and I have already talked about this with my mom and she says I can get it if the tattoo is small and also where nobody can see it. So, I was thinking about kind of near my cock. Not right next to it obviously, but below my pants line where nobody will be able to see it unless I show it to them.

I don't think I will regret it down the road, because even if the tattoo falls out of favor with me it isn't like it will matter. 99.99% of people I meet will never know I have the damn thing. My friends will know about it and any girlfriends I have. But, that is about all the people that will know.

My mother has already said yes, and since my dad has two tattoos himself (one of a cobra and another of some Godsmack symbol) I doubt that he will say no.

Thoughts?

I was thinking something like this. About two inches tall and just barely below my waist.

[BrainworkInProgress]

no, just no

[Light]

Whatever you want to do with your body is your choice.

[Timmy]

Generally, unless the tattoo has some personal significance to you, I don't think it's a good idea. Just because you think Woodstock is the shit doesn't mean he should be on your body forever.

At least it sounds like you chose the perfect spot if you're going to make a mistake, though.

[Pride]

At 4/20/11 02:08 PM, Cootie wrote: Thoughts?

I was thinking something like this. About two inches tall and just barely below my waist.

Getting a tattoo is really more of a personal decision/preference (doesn't matter what we think, your the one who's gonna have to live with it). Getting a Woodstock tattoo near my dick wouldn't be something I'd do, but to each his own.

One of my previous Girlfriends had a tattoo of InuYasha on her wrist, needless to say it was a turnoff lol

[Gagsy]

Seems a very girly tattoo.

[Cootie]

At 4/20/11 02:13 PM, Timmy wrote: Generally, unless the tattoo has some personal significance to you, I don't think it's a good idea. Just because you think Woodstock is the shit doesn't mean he should be on your body forever.

At least it sounds like you chose the perfect spot if you're going to make a mistake, though.

Well, I obviously don't have some deep and everlasting connection with Woodstock. But, I am also not picking the tattoo "just because". I used to love the old Peanuts cartoons and I still do. Woodstock is my favorite character, and he does give me a might powerful nostalgia-gasm.

[RubberTrucky]

Wasn't that a sitcom episode, like that 70s show or something, where Eric wants Donna's name and goes with that old stoner who keeps getting Donna's name wrong. So he's afraid what he's gotten and at the end Donna sees the tattoo and is like "Woodstock?" "What does it say 'I love Woodstock'?" "No, it's that little bird."

[orangebomb]

What you decide to put on your canvas of skin is your choice. I've seen some people tattoo their names, favorite sports teams logo, and even cartoon characters as well, which the last one I've said is just plain weird to me to a certain degree. {e.g: getting a tattoo of Haruhi Suzumiya, and then explaining it to your kids 30 years later on how and why you got that tat.}

[Lagatag]

Get a tattoo of a large black NG tankman

[steph2568]

Get it on your ass like Eric did from That 70s Show.

[Dromedary]

NG TANK NG TANK NG TANK

NG Tank

[BlubbOnly]

I think tattoos are great, but I would only consider getting one if it have some meaning or is related to you somehow. I also would place it somewhere where it is visible, like on your arm or what not. Myself I am thinking about Japanese letters on my forearm. That would be awesome !

[Oolaph]

I think it sounds like a dandy idea, but you must promise to share pictures once the deed is done. I want to see this.

[CheapTrick]

Better yet get a tatoo of this woodstock in your forehead.

[Cootie]

At 4/20/11 02:57 PM, Oolaph wrote: I think it sounds like a dandy idea, but you must promise to share pictures once the deed is done. I want to see this.

It won't be for a while if it even gets done at all. I will probably get it for my birthday if I do decide to stick with the idea. I was thinking about getting Hey Arnold for a while, but then I decided that Woodstock would be better.

[parzo]

I'll never understand the point of getting tattoos in places no one will generally see. If you're going to ink yourself, you might as well go all out.

But if it makes you happy, go for it.

[lolomfgisuck]

that's a pretty gay spot to get a tattoo.... what's next, you going to get a lower back tat?

[Slint]

No. Seriously, don't.

[mohammadrtr]

yea sure what ever

[Dean]

Just to counter balance all this "you'll regret it when you're older" stuff, you only get one life. What does it matter if you have an image attached to you for the rest of it or not? In time, it's going to be over anyway, so might as well do what you want to do.

I already have a couple tattoo ideas of my own and I'm just waiting to convert my plan into an action.

[Cootie]

At 4/20/11 04:34 PM, Dean wrote: Just to counter balance all this "you'll regret it when you're older" stuff, you only get one life. What does it matter if you have an image attached to you for the rest of it or not? In time, it's going to be over anyway, so might as well do what you want to do.

I already have a couple tattoo ideas of my own and I'm just waiting to convert my plan into an action.

Also, I don't really see how I could regret this thing anyways. Nobody is gonna see it unless I show it to them. And, when I get really old and the tattoo is gonna start looking bad I most likely will be married or not getting much sex anyways.

[CharltonChinchilla]

At 4/20/11 02:08 PM, Cootie wrote:

:So, I was thinking about kind of near my cock. Not right next to it obviously, but below my pants line where nobody will be able to see it unless I show it to them.

That is just fucking stupid. Are you drunk?

[Dogmeat]

At 4/20/11 02:14 PM, Gagsy wrote: Seems a very girly tattoo.

It is Cootie...

[Yert]

That's a fucking stupid tattoo.

[Graduation]

At 4/20/11 05:57 PM, Yert wrote: That's a fucking stupid tattoo.

Indeed. Too bad he's filled with that stupidity that is known as "16 year old 'cool' kid".

Because after all, he won't regret it later when he tries for a job that for some extremely important reason requires no tattoos, and he can't get it.

[lolomfgisuck]

At 4/20/11 02:14 PM, Gagsy wrote: Seems a very girly tattoo.

I second this... I'd make fun of a grown man who had Woodstock tattooed below his waist.

Can't you get it on your leg.. or shoulder or something? You do realize that girls put hearts and bunny stickers in the place you want to get a tattoo right?

[RacistBassist]

If you ever regret a tattoo later on in life, you obviously didn't live life right to have that be a regret.

[Cootie]

At 4/20/11 05:59 PM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/20/11 05:57 PM, Yert wrote: That's a fucking stupid tattoo.

Indeed. Too bad he's filled with that stupidity that is known as "16 year old 'cool' kid".

Because after all, he won't regret it later when he tries for a job that for some extremely important reason requires no tattoos, and he can't get it.

Because every job interview requires that I drop my pants. I could lie and he would never know.

[SlapAHo]

First of all, a guy getting a tattoo of Woodstock is pretty lame, no matter how awesome he is to you.And second of all, the spot your choosing to make it is more for girls so it will look weird and kind of gay.