Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

As a gay male who has seen many penises, uncut is definetely better looking.

I just can't see a reason to it, a rational point. I mean there has to be one HUGE reason to have a part of your body fucking chopped off.

Its a good thing im not circumsized, those mother fuckers better not have cut at my dick. I like it to be natural, plus masturbation is more fun with it still there (So I have heard)

At 4/10/11 06:13 AM, notahero wrote:

At 4/9/11 06:58 PM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/9/11 06:42 PM, notahero wrote:

At 4/9/11 05:51 PM, Colin wrote: You can't imagine what it feels like without it... Do you want to know? I say go for it.
Especially considering that your dick is probably nasty as fuck.

Hygiene are are the same, nothing different on cleanliness, just a bit more procedures. Some even said that without the cover it is easier for infection.

Balanitis is PROVEN to be more frequent in uncircumcised males. Unlike your "some say" weasel words.

http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/bala nitis/edwards1/

As I said before, there are no absolute conclusion to this. That's why this "weasel words" are everywhere. Thanks for the link by the way, but as I said, hygiene are the same, we all need to wash it. It doesn't mean that you will still get it if you clean it everyday. We all need to clean ourselves.

The absolute conclusion is that Balanitis is proven to be more frequent in uncircumcised males. As stated in the reliable source that I have provided. You may continue to say NO ITS NOT but you aren't getting anywhere beyond making yourself look silly. You are disputing facts with anecdotes. The only outcome of this is going to be failure on your part.

At 4/10/11 11:05 AM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/10/11 06:13 AM, notahero wrote:

At 4/9/11 06:58 PM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/9/11 06:42 PM, notahero wrote:

At 4/9/11 05:51 PM, Colin wrote: You can't imagine what it feels like without it... Do you want to know? I say go for it.
Especially considering that your dick is probably nasty as fuck.

Hygiene are are the same, nothing different on cleanliness, just a bit more procedures. Some even said that without the cover it is easier for infection.

Balanitis is PROVEN to be more frequent in uncircumcised males. Unlike your "some say" weasel words.

http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/bala nitis/edwards1/

As I said before, there are no absolute conclusion to this. That's why this "weasel words" are everywhere. Thanks for the link by the way, but as I said, hygiene are the same, we all need to wash it. It doesn't mean that you will still get it if you clean it everyday. We all need to clean ourselves.

The absolute conclusion is that Balanitis is proven to be more frequent in uncircumcised males. As stated in the reliable source that I have provided. You may continue to say NO ITS NOT but you aren't getting anywhere beyond making yourself look silly. You are disputing facts with anecdotes. The only outcome of this is going to be failure on your part.

Sorry if it sounds that way, but there's something that bothers me. It is that I don't understand why uncircumcised sounds very evil. Which is silly too. Maybe that's the reason I sounded that way. Thank you for the link as it proves to be useful. I am not saying that it's not true, but as I said before, hygiene are the same, there is nothing evil or nasty about it. I did do some further readings after I did yours also, so thank you again for your info. :)

Is the OP mentally retarded?

At 4/10/11 01:59 PM, Luis wrote: oh cool another circumcision topic.

Luis, we're having a debate here. Go learn to use your shift key or something.

At 4/10/11 02:12 PM, Luis wrote: I apoligize. resume said debate over a quarter inch of other peoples skin.

Thank you for being so kind and understanding.

At 4/10/11 02:16 PM, Tokecat wrote:

At 4/10/11 02:12 PM, Luis wrote:

At 4/10/11 02:09 PM, Oolaph wrote:

At 4/10/11 01:59 PM, Luis wrote:

I apoligize. resume said debate over a quarter inch of other peoples skin.

This is why this is such a crappy debate. Lets see, people arguing for circumcision: Jews. People arguing against circumcision: everyone else.

WOW THIS DEBATE IS REALLY GOING TO GO SOMEWHERE.

Yes, this debate will settle an argument that has been going on for hundreds of years

To me, circumcised dicks look raw and sore, maybe because they're red. Go uncut.

At 4/10/11 02:17 PM, suprememessage wrote:

At 4/10/11 02:16 PM, Tokecat wrote:

At 4/10/11 02:12 PM, Luis wrote:

At 4/10/11 02:09 PM, Oolaph wrote:

At 4/10/11 01:59 PM, Luis wrote:

I apoligize. resume said debate over a quarter inch of other peoples skin.

This is why this is such a crappy debate. Lets see, people arguing for circumcision: Jews. People arguing against circumcision: everyone else.

WOW THIS DEBATE IS REALLY GOING TO GO SOMEWHERE.

Yes, this debate will settle an argument that has been going on for hundreds of years

Don't the Catholics also go for circumcision? Since masturbation is sodomy to them. Who else also go against circumcision because I don't know any.

At 4/10/11 01:51 PM, notahero wrote:

At 4/10/11 11:05 AM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/10/11 06:13 AM, notahero wrote:

At 4/9/11 06:58 PM, JohnnyDamon wrote:

At 4/9/11 06:42 PM, notahero wrote:

At 4/9/11 05:51 PM, Colin wrote: You can't imagine what it feels like without it... Do you want to know? I say go for it.
Especially considering that your dick is probably nasty as fuck.

Hygiene are are the same, nothing different on cleanliness, just a bit more procedures. Some even said that without the cover it is easier for infection.

Balanitis is PROVEN to be more frequent in uncircumcised males. Unlike your "some say" weasel words.

http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/bala nitis/edwards1/

As I said before, there are no absolute conclusion to this. That's why this "weasel words" are everywhere. Thanks for the link by the way, but as I said, hygiene are the same, we all need to wash it. It doesn't mean that you will still get it if you clean it everyday. We all need to clean ourselves.

The absolute conclusion is that Balanitis is proven to be more frequent in uncircumcised males. As stated in the reliable source that I have provided. You may continue to say NO ITS NOT but you aren't getting anywhere beyond making yourself look silly. You are disputing facts with anecdotes. The only outcome of this is going to be failure on your part.

Sorry if it sounds that way, but there's something that bothers me. It is that I don't understand why uncircumcised sounds very evil. Which is silly too. Maybe that's the reason I sounded that way. Thank you for the link as it proves to be useful. I am not saying that it's not true, but as I said before, hygiene are the same, there is nothing evil or nasty about it. I did do some further readings after I did yours also, so thank you again for your info. :)

And to state further (if you may) Balanitis occurs if it's wet and haven't been properly dry. I think this part will be cultural related, which I'd rather not go into lengthy details. From other readings, and some local knowledge (in my country, most people are uncircumcised unless you're a Muslim). It is a matter of hygiene on your private part. As I said the hygiene are the same because you need to clean, wash, etc. etc. Circumcised also have their problems if they are not clean properly right? Thanks again for the info. :)

At 4/10/11 02:16 PM, Tokecat wrote: This is why this is such a crappy debate. Lets see, people arguing for circumcision: Jews. People arguing against circumcision: everyone else.

I'm not arguing against it. I'm arguing that doing it to people without their consent is wrong.