At 7/22/11 02:18 PM, FlyingNinjaBannanas wrote:

At 7/22/11 09:06 AM, Carr77 wrote: Well... I don't think we should call it a tribute.
If you don't think it is good enough to be called 60 frame collab 4, we shall make it good enough to be called 60 frames collab 4! :D

We don't need to rush stuff.
How many more GOOD parts do we need before we could call us 60 frames collab 4, steak?

All I know is that we need about 10 to 15 more high/medium quality parts to live up to the previous collabs.

Also, I have an idea for the name. It still should be called the 60 Frame Collab 4 (or whatever we decide on) : due to newgrounds 20 character limit. But for the full name: 60 Frame Collab 4: The not-so Epic Finale.

10-15 more parts is not so hard. I mean...
If we make some more parts we will be there soon enough.
And I think some new people will join if we'll hold this thread alive.
A month or 2 from now the collab should be done :D

P.S. Sorry for my english :D

I will change the tribute part, I disagree with Steak, it sounds a little weird. And no, in my opinion still, it is still not as good as the previous one. Call it something along the lines of 'Celebration'. Please take my word, people will be commenting aggressively over the quality of the collab.

There are a fair few great parts in this collab, but there are some...meh, whereas the previous one was consistent.

Anyway, here is a really rough draft of the menu, tribute will be erased too.

http://www.newgrounds.com/dump/item/ba22 a3d436f5c5ae98a13a9b752bf6bd

I hope you like it.

At 7/22/11 10:59 PM, SketchyEntertainment wrote: I will change the tribute part, I disagree with Steak, it sounds a little weird. And no, in my opinion still, it is still not as good as the previous one. Call it something along the lines of 'Celebration'. Please take my word, people will be commenting aggressively over the quality of the collab.

There are a fair few great parts in this collab, but there are some...meh, whereas the previous one was consistent.

Anyway, here is a really rough draft of the menu, tribute will be erased too.

http://www.newgrounds.com/dump/item/ba22 a3d436f5c5ae98a13a9b752bf6bd

I hope you like it.

Can't we just call it 60 frames collab: The End?

That would be good. I mean... it is the last one.
And then we are not calling it 60 frames collab 4.
Plus someone can make a part where there is an explosion at the end.
And that is the last part in the collab... like.... evrything died there.
A bit portal like :D

Hey guys - I'm currently amidst creating the music for the piece. Do we yet have an idea about the finalized length of the piece / the desired length of the song?

At 7/23/11 05:32 PM, ThunderBeats wrote: Hey guys - I'm currently amidst creating the music for the piece. Do we yet have an idea about the finalized length of the piece / the desired length of the song?

I will get you the exact length when I finish compileing. Each animation is about 3 seconds long so 3x40 (40 being what we can hopefully get) is 2 minutes ( i think)

How many parts we got?

At 7/23/11 09:54 PM, WaterHorse wrote: How many parts we got?

Not sure. When I finish compileing the videos I will let you know.

At 7/24/11 12:08 AM, Mckellard wrote:

At 7/23/11 09:54 PM, WaterHorse wrote: How many parts we got?

Not sure. When I finish compileing the videos I will let you know.

Sweet! Then we will know how many more parts we need :D

I will be away until friday, so if you need me, please ask me then.

Thanks

-SketchyEntertainment

At 7/24/11 12:08 AM, Mckellard wrote:

At 7/23/11 09:54 PM, WaterHorse wrote: How many parts we got?

Not sure. When I finish compileing the videos I will let you know.

Fantastic, thanks :) I'll be getting together with the girl that is going to sing some vocals for the track over the next few weeks. To confirm, we want a rock / dubstep / techno kind of feel, correct?

At 7/25/11 08:43 AM, ThunderBeats wrote: Fantastic, thanks :) I'll be getting together with the girl that is going to sing some vocals for the track over the next few weeks. To confirm, we want a rock / dubstep / techno kind of feel, correct?

That is correct.

At 7/11/11 07:03 PM, WaterHorse wrote: I think is done

What do i do with the .fla
FLA

I just noticed this post now as I was going through the thread lol. I have the .fla so you don't need to do anything else with it. Great job, It came out very good.

To everyone else I am almost done collecting all of the .flas i can find. When I am done I will post the names of the ones I have and the ones that I am missing, once I do that you can remove the flas from the dump if you like to keep it clean. And also please keep up you swf's untill we release the final video. Also from what it looks like now, we still need alot more animations. I am going to make a few more and I hope you guys will too. Thanks for everyones help and I will post the names and how many we have in a little.

Please give feedback. Note that this is my second

SWF Version
FLA File

At 7/25/11 07:34 PM, toontown1 wrote: Please give feedback. Note that this is my second

SWF Version
FLA File

Add some shading to the wizard and more detail to the ground below him and you have a great part.

At 7/25/11 07:34 PM, toontown1 wrote: Please give feedback. Note that this is my second

SWF Version
FLA File

Well im not realy sure whats going on if its stationary or flying. If he is stationary make the ground look like its not moving. If moving make the background move. other than that the detail is good and i do like the background.

Well im not realy sure whats going on if its stationary or flying. If he is stationary make the ground look like its not moving. If moving make the background move. other than that the detail is good and i do like the background.

Do this after what FlyingNinjaBannanas said^^

At 7/25/11 07:34 PM, toontown1 wrote: Please give feedback. Note that this is my second

SWF Version
FLA File

It looks good.
Make the background move though.
(Note: The sentence below may contain bad english!)
But why is the witch a silhouette but not her broom?

I will make another part!

If we have low quality parts, we can remake them or something...

At 7/26/11 05:10 PM, z017 wrote: I will make another part!

If we have low quality parts, we can remake them or something...

Maybe, but only if we get permission from the authors of the parts.

Hello!
I DID IT! Another part!
I hope you guys will make some more parts too :D
Okay!
SWF & FLA

I like...
Some strange music just like... started to play and I just animated :D
I made this ant god. He is like.... an ant, a tomato, and a salad, and... he has like... elf legs! :D
And he has some heads that prays to him... or something like that...

Is it good? Is it high quality?

P.S. My english is not so good. So if anything sounds strange or so... just... you know...

Is it to Steaky I should send the SWF and FLA to?

Ok! I made another part... again...
I hope you'll think this is high-quality:
SWF
FLA

Sooo... what do you think? Is it good?
Anyone else that is creatin' parts?

P.S. Should I send the parts to someone? Steakie? Bananaz?

o.0 I just realized that all my FLA's is CS4...
Is that OK?
I think Steakie has CS3... But not sure :(

At 7/30/11 01:08 PM, Carr77 wrote: o.0 I just realized that all my FLA's is CS4...
Is that OK?
I think Steakie has CS3... But not sure :(

CS4 is fine

At 7/30/11 02:59 PM, Mckellard wrote:

At 7/30/11 01:08 PM, Carr77 wrote: o.0 I just realized that all my FLA's is CS4...
Is that OK?
I think Steakie has CS3... But not sure :(

CS4 is fine

Yeah, I have CS4 so I could convert it if needed.

Also Carr, add shading to your parts, then they will be medium-high quality. It's not as hard as it seems.

At 7/30/11 05:43 PM, FlyingNinjaBannanas wrote: Also Carr, add shading to your parts, then they will be medium-high quality. It's not as hard as it seems.

Okay.
Do you have an example?
Like... have you made a part with shading? Just so I can see how you mean :D
Like... an example :3

At 7/30/11 06:42 PM, Carr77 wrote:

At 7/30/11 05:43 PM, FlyingNinjaBannanas wrote: Also Carr, add shading to your parts, then they will be medium-high quality. It's not as hard as it seems.

Okay.
Do you have an example?
Like... have you made a part with shading? Just so I can see how you mean :D
Like... an example :3

Not mine, but here's an example.

http://www.newgrounds.com/dump/item/1a97 0215ed0058db72f99b2d9baaeb28

At 7/30/11 05:43 PM, FlyingNinjaBannanas wrote: Also Carr, add shading to your parts.

Okay. I gave it a try...
Anywayzzzz...
I am now going to link the first (no shadows) version and second (shadows) version of the first part.

If you like the shadowning on the part, I will do it on the second part too :D
So...

First version (no shadows)
Second version (shadows)

Which one was best? Shadow or no shadow?

At 7/31/11 07:48 AM, Carr77 wrote:

Which one was best? Shadow or no shadow?

i like the shadow one

At 7/31/11 09:38 PM, WaterHorse wrote:

At 7/31/11 07:48 AM, Carr77 wrote:

Which one was best? Shadow or no shadow?

i like the shadow one

Yeah, the shadow one is better. Where is the light source? Sorry for the question, I'm just trying to help.