sharpen quality of photo?
- Lumber-Jax12
-
Lumber-Jax12
- Member since: Jan. 15, 2011
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 02
- Blank Slate
Im decent with computers but no wizard so i was wondering if there was a way to increase the quality of my desktop background, the ones they give you look fine( the way they are shown in the boxes you pick them from, basically in hd quality), yet the ones i pull off the net are too blurry how do i sharpen the image? this is the photo i want?
- unowned
-
unowned
- Member since: Jun. 10, 2005
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 07
- Blank Slate
lens focus and psilobycin mushrooms, never a digital "sharpen" tool
- Squidbit
-
Squidbit
- Member since: Jul. 7, 2009
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Animator
- Lumber-Jax12
-
Lumber-Jax12
- Member since: Jan. 15, 2011
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 02
- Blank Slate
At 2/5/11 11:35 PM, squirrelking69 wrote: Is this what you're going for?
i mean they look the same when you show them in smaller proportions, but when its enlarged the quality decreases, which ruins the whole purpose of the pic
- IncendiaryProduction
-
IncendiaryProduction
- Member since: Jan. 25, 2010
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 11
- Game Developer
At 2/5/11 11:41 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:At 2/5/11 11:35 PM, squirrelking69 wrote: Is this what you're going for?i mean they look the same when you show them in smaller proportions, but when its enlarged the quality decreases, which ruins the whole purpose of the pic
There is no way to fix that.
When enlarged the photo retains it's original resolution, and enlarges the actual pixels, ruining the quality.
There is no way to change that, with out the original photo being bigger. It will always lose quality, it's just a fact of life.
- Squidbit
-
Squidbit
- Member since: Jul. 7, 2009
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Animator
At 2/5/11 11:41 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:At 2/5/11 11:35 PM, squirrelking69 wrote: Is this what you're going for?i mean they look the same when you show them in smaller proportions, but when its enlarged the quality decreases, which ruins the whole purpose of the pic
What's your screen resolution? I might be able to make it work.
- Lumber-Jax12
-
Lumber-Jax12
- Member since: Jan. 15, 2011
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 02
- Blank Slate
At 2/5/11 11:44 PM, IncendiaryProduction wrote:At 2/5/11 11:41 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:There is no way to fix that.At 2/5/11 11:35 PM, squirrelking69 wrote: Is this what you're going for?i mean they look the same when you show them in smaller proportions, but when its enlarged the quality decreases, which ruins the whole purpose of the pic
When enlarged the photo retains it's original resolution, and enlarges the actual pixels, ruining the quality.
There is no way to change that, with out the original photo being bigger. It will always lose quality, it's just a fact of life.
No offense, but i don't think your correct on that one the pictures provided to you by the company/laptop/etc (the ones you find when you look at pictures for backgrounds already give to you) retain their quality, is there a reason or any insight on this?
- LardLord
-
LardLord
- Member since: Jun. 3, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 04
- Blank Slate
At 2/5/11 11:50 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: No offense, but i don't think your correct on that one the pictures provided to you by the company/laptop/etc (the ones you find when you look at pictures for backgrounds already give to you) retain their quality, is there a reason or any insight on this?
IncendiaryProduction did not explain things very well, but he's essentially right. JPG and GIF images all have a static predefined width and height. They are composed of a static number of pixels, each of which also has a predefined height and width. A JPG image cannot be made larger than its native resolution without pixel distortion, and neither can a GIF image. Desktop backgrounds are natively larger images of a resolution on the order of 1024 x 768 pixels or higher. If you do not provide an image that natively replicates that resolution, there will always be distortion.
- samwd1717
-
samwd1717
- Member since: Nov. 16, 2010
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 01
- Blank Slate
- Lumber-Jax12
-
Lumber-Jax12
- Member since: Jan. 15, 2011
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 02
- Blank Slate
At 2/5/11 11:55 PM, LardLord wrote:At 2/5/11 11:50 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: No offense, but i don't think your correct on that one the pictures provided to you by the company/laptop/etc (the ones you find when you look at pictures for backgrounds already give to you) retain their quality, is there a reason or any insight on this?a bunch of stuff that i don't fully understand, but still gets the message from
All right so basically if i want good quality im better off putting them in tile form?
- IncendiaryProduction
-
IncendiaryProduction
- Member since: Jan. 25, 2010
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 11
- Game Developer
At 2/5/11 11:50 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: No offense, but i don't think your correct on that one the pictures provided to you by the company/laptop/etc (the ones you find when you look at pictures for backgrounds already give to you) retain their quality, is there a reason or any insight on this?
As I said, the original pictures are larger. There is no way to enlarge that picture and make it retain quality.
It WILL pixelate.
I did do a reverse image search though, and found a larger version of that image, so it will lose less quality.
- Squidbit
-
Squidbit
- Member since: Jul. 7, 2009
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Animator
At 2/5/11 11:59 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:At 2/5/11 11:55 PM, LardLord wrote:All right so basically if i want good quality im better off putting them in tile form?At 2/5/11 11:50 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: No offense, but i don't think your correct on that one the pictures provided to you by the company/laptop/etc (the ones you find when you look at pictures for backgrounds already give to you) retain their quality, is there a reason or any insight on this?a bunch of stuff that i don't fully understand, but still gets the message from
Essentially, but tile looks like shit. You're better off finding a picture that matches your screen resolution. Again, what's your screen resolution?
- Lumber-Jax12
-
Lumber-Jax12
- Member since: Jan. 15, 2011
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 02
- Blank Slate
At 2/6/11 12:01 AM, squirrelking69 wrote:At 2/5/11 11:59 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:Essentially, but tile looks like shit. You're better off finding a picture that matches your screen resolution. Again, what's your screen resolution?At 2/5/11 11:55 PM, LardLord wrote:blah blahAt 2/5/11 11:50 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: blah blahblah blah
its 1600x900, it's a pretty big laptop the screen can fit a textbook on it, if that gives insight/makes sense
- Squidbit
-
Squidbit
- Member since: Jul. 7, 2009
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Animator
At 2/6/11 12:05 AM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:At 2/6/11 12:01 AM, squirrelking69 wrote:its 1600x900, it's a pretty big laptop the screen can fit a textbook on it, if that gives insight/makes senseAt 2/5/11 11:59 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote:Essentially, but tile looks like shit. You're better off finding a picture that matches your screen resolution. Again, what's your screen resolution?At 2/5/11 11:55 PM, LardLord wrote:blah blahAt 2/5/11 11:50 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: blah blahblah blah
Why is your screen so wide? I would find that pretty inconvinient.
Anyway, how's this?




