http://kotaku.com/5813389/console-battle field-3-is-half-the-fps-of-modern-warfar e-3
I'm definitely getting the PC version. only 30 frames per second on the console, while PC gets 60 fps.
The console version is watered down too much for me to bear. A Battlefield game with only 32 players max? Also judging from the Jimmy Fallon footage, the muzzle flash looks poor, and the overall look and feel of the console version does not match the superior quality of the PC.
Also I spent $700 on my PC that I made for myself, and it's four years old and it can still run the newest games on super high. So the argument that PC gaming is too expensive is invalid. While you console gamers play in your limited 30 frames per second, less detailed textures, and smaller maps with less players, I'll be playing a much high quality Battlefield 3 experience.
PC GAMING power!