i thought about this for a while...

[rocky99213]

what if how much u weighed was a negitive number

[Killinkyle]

At 12/1/10 03:59 PM, rocky99213 wrote: what if how much u weighed was a negitive number

I read through your post at least 100 times and I still don't get it.

[yonokowhat]

immpossible, we cant absorb gravity/mass?

[SuperSilver123]

At 12/1/10 03:59 PM, rocky99213 wrote: what if how much u weighed was a negitive number

What if the amount you weighed was a negative number?*****

And, not possible. At all.

[BlackmarketKraig]

At 12/1/10 03:59 PM, rocky99213 wrote: what if how much u weighed was a negitive number

There are things that weigh less than 'nothing' because the weight of 'nothing' is the weight of air. So some things (like helium) have negative weight, but still have mass and weight, it's just less than that of air.

[Lagerkapo]

I would be antimatter?

[SomaGuye]

At 12/1/10 04:03 PM, Lagerkapo wrote: I would be antimatter?

Antimatter doesn't have negative mass.

[Ptero]

whoa man u r deep whoa

[InsertFunnyUserName]

Since weight is a measure of force, an object with a negative weight would be one that moved against gravity without any applied force. Unless of course you mean mass, in which case the object would have to be tearing a whole in the fabric of the universe.

[Ketchemonia]

You have a mental disorder, its is impossible to have your weight under 0, but if possible you could probably float.

[SomaGuye]

At 12/1/10 04:12 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: Since weight is a measure of force, an object with a negative weight would be one that moved against gravity without any applied force. Unless of course you mean mass, in which case the object would have to be tearing a whole in the fabric of the universe.

Weight is the force caused by gravity, so negative weight would mean the object is repelled by gravitational fields, like how the north pole of a magnet repels another north pole.

[SpiffyMasta]

At 12/1/10 04:25 PM, SomaGuye wrote:

At 12/1/10 04:12 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: Since weight is a measure of force, an object with a negative weight would be one that moved against gravity without any applied force. Unless of course you mean mass, in which case the object would have to be tearing a whole in the fabric of the universe.

Weight is the force caused by gravity, so negative weight would mean the object is repelled by gravitational fields, like how the north pole of a magnet repels another north pole.

That's exactly what he said when he wrote an object that moved against gravity without any applied force lol

Stop smoking weed op and put your brain to better things than imagining ripping the universe apart.

[spartan2744]

Even if we weighed a negative number, gravity would still hold us down... but if you get hit by a car... bring a parachute

[Monolight]

At 12/1/10 04:03 PM, BlackmarketKraig wrote: There are things that weigh less than 'nothing' because the weight of 'nothing' is the weight of air. So some things (like helium) have negative weight, but still have mass and weight, it's just less than that of air.

WROOONG.jpg

Air and helium both have weight, It's just that helium is lighter than air.

[mooguy]

Your topic title got my hopes up for a suicide video, or a reason for killing themselves at least, damn cyber bullies.

I hope you're proud of yourself.

[PWJP]

Weight = Mass + Force of gravity.
Because gravity can't really repel objects (if I remember right) and having a negative mass would screw up most laws of physics, having negative weight is impossible.

[CyanSandwich]

Let's see if we weigh negative something by sticking a scale to the roof. If we float up to it and press against it, we'll put a negative in front of whatever number we get.

[ChopstickClock]

Gasses such as helium have negative weight, compared to air that is, as weight has to be relative to the median through which the object in question is being weighed.

[NerdLiife]

Then we might be able to float in a pool like Saturn.