Saw 3d?

[PoloPancake]

Well, I'm off in 15 minutes to see it.
So far I've heard it's the last Saw movie (7th I think) and that, well, it's 3D. 3D really is more of a gimmick, because there's no way I'm seeing traps in my face or spaceships like in Avatar.

Gruesome and no-brainer as it may be, it's a nice Halloween treat.

Thoughts?

[TechnoGoomba]

You are a fool.

You will regret this day.

[Platypus]

I'm getting sick of all this 3D crap.

In my day...

[sandwich-eater]

there seems to be a lot of hate for saw. I like it. Even though 7 movies probably aren't needed.
And this one is the last so anyone thats seen most of them should probably watch it. Anyway hopefully it's good or atleast decent. Should wrap things up nicely.

just like lost! lol

but seriously it seems pretty cool from the trailers, even though they're a lil cheesy.
Tell us how it went i guess.

and yeah the 3d gimmicky crap is crap but it doesn't really matter since it's offered in 2d (at some places anyway) and the 3d might even make it more interesting.

[Penboy]

if you can't make it good, make it 3d.

[quanmandetil]

Its Tomatometer on Rotten Tomatoes is 9%

[Falonefal]

"3D"? How do you define "3D"?

[quanmandetil]

This 3D stuff is getting old. I demand SAW 4D, where the traps literally come out at the audience and half of the people in the theater are put into sadistic puzzles that involve loss of limb, while the other half sits and watches!

[yurgenburgen]

At 10/30/10 08:38 AM, Admiral wrote: "3D"? How do you define "3D"?

"In three-dimensional form".

[Falonefal]

At 10/30/10 08:51 AM, yurgenburgen wrote:

At 10/30/10 08:38 AM, Admiral wrote: "3D"? How do you define "3D"?

"In three-dimensional form".

Then 3D movies are not 3D, Neo.

[chipotleaway]

Saw movies started sucking after the second one. Now their just milking tons of money from people who actually still watch those crap movies. Especially in 3D.

Please don't go.

[Falonefal]

At 10/30/10 08:55 AM, chipotleaway wrote: Saw movies started sucking after the second one. Now their just milking tons of money from people who actually still watch those crap movies. Especially in 3D.

Please don't go.

Actually, Saw movies started to suck after the 0th one.

[quanmandetil]

At 10/30/10 09:02 AM, Admiral wrote:

At 10/30/10 08:55 AM, chipotleaway wrote: Saw movies started sucking after the second one. Now their just milking tons of money from people who actually still watch those crap movies. Especially in 3D.

Please don't go.

Actually, Saw movies started to suck after the 0th one.

LOL U BIG FUNNY I GO FAP NAO

[Falonefal]

At 10/30/10 09:03 AM, quanmandetil wrote:

LOL U BIG FUNNY I GO FAP NAO

You already are "Fap"

[Gagsy]

At 10/30/10 08:45 AM, quanmandetil wrote: This 3D stuff is getting old. I demand SAW 4D, where the traps literally come out at the audience and half of the people in the theater are put into sadistic puzzles that involve loss of limb, while the other half sits and watches!

I approve of this so hard.

Personally though I stopped watching after the 2nd film. The first was genius, that ending was omg brilliant. Then the 2nd came and it had that pit full of needles and my mind did a whole 'No' thing. I had no intentions of watching anymore.

[b0em]

At 10/30/10 09:10 AM, Admiral wrote:

At 10/30/10 09:03 AM, quanmandetil wrote:

LOL U BIG FUNNY I GO FAP NAO

You already are "Fap"

Harharharharhar!!

[Falonefal]

At 10/30/10 09:15 AM, b0em wrote:

At 10/30/10 09:10 AM, Admiral wrote:

At 10/30/10 09:03 AM, quanmandetil wrote:

LOL U BIG FUNNY I GO FAP NAO

You already are "Fap"

Harharharharhar!!

AND YOU KNOW IT!!!

[Deadly-Shadow]

I stopped caring about Saw after the third movie. After looking back at them now, they were pretty stupid. Unfortunatly I'm being dragged to see this one with a friend, so I'm going to have to make the best of it.

[PicoFulp]

Have you seen the effort they have to put in to make something 3D? It's a seriously under rated format. It's under rated only because of people making movies 3D for no reason except that they can. Take Clash of The Titans for example.

[Falonefal]

At 10/30/10 10:05 AM, PicoFulp wrote: Have you seen the effort they have to put in to make something 3D? It's a seriously under rated format. It's under rated only because of people making movies 3D for no reason except that they can. Take Clash of The Titans for example.

3D movies... Two camera's attached to a fork on eye distance away from each other.

Oh the EFFORT

[iateamexican]

At 10/30/10 10:05 AM, PicoFulp wrote: Have you seen the effort they have to put in to make something 3D?

Wasted effort.
If they put that effort into turning movies like Saw 3D, Clash of the Titans or Pihrana 3D into actually watchable, enjoyable films, they'd still fail miserably, but at least we wouldn't have to see all this 3D bullshit pasted up everywhere.

[DukenukemALT]

The only good saw is saw 1

[manonthemoon516]

I have to admit that the Saw movies are a sort of guilty pleasure for me. I'm not saying they're good, because I think the last four have been particularly bad, but I'll probably see it eventually. Just because.