Who is contributing more?

[Porch]

The worker, or the inventor?

The inventors create new contraptions, but if we have too much of them there will be less workers to create the invention.

The workers create the society we live in, but if we hae too much of them everything will be bland and stuck in one era.

What do you think?

[razorbladesigh]

Me, the user. Without someone to use the item, both the inventor and worker are useless.

[Porch]

bump

[1Tyla1]

The inventor. Without the idea, workers will not be able to work with the idea.

Whereas... the inventor can also be the worker the same way a songwriter can be an instrumentalist. Or vice versa.

[00Nick00]

I think they are both are about the same. The inventor just comes up with ideas they may or may not work while the worker have to make them to see if they work. With out the inventors the workers would have nothing to work on and with out workers the inventors will not be able to see if there ideas work.

Even though sometimes the inventor can make stuff to, they usually need something that was made by a worker in order for them to come up with new things and the other way around to.

[The-Great-One]

At 9/19/10 02:28 PM, silentkat wrote: The person posting the post about the worker and inventor.

So in theory we must kill the posters. Let's start with the OP.

[Odio]

YAY MARXISM

THE WORKER WILL RUSE AGAINST THE INTELLIGENTSIA AND START A COMMUNIST REVOLUTION

HAEUKEHKAEUHKAUEHAKEUAELEHUALEKHUAE

But no, the thinker.

[vannila-guerilla]

The inventer. Without whom none of this would be possible.

[Ericho]

Probably the inventor and that is the person who is the most likely to become famous at least. If you ask about some great scientists throughout world history, you might think of some inventors, but when was the last time you thought of a great worker? Well, could non-inventor scientists perhaps be considered workers? Albert Einstein did not invent anything (at least I do not think he did) but he is probably more famous than most inventors.

[Jackdabomb]

The inventor who also works contributes the most.

[IncendiaryProduction]

the chicken came first.

[gekko007]

If there's 100 inventors, they would all try to invent, but only a few of them would be the best inventors. The rest won't be a match to the better inventors, leaving them without money. They would have to become workers, since anyone can be a worker.

If there's 100 workers, there's 100 people building shit without knowing wth they are doing. Due to their subpar brains, they are not able to invent.

On conlusion, inventors > workers, since everyone can train muscles, but not everyone can train their brain.

[kittehg0d]

the guy.

[Ptero]

Batman.

[Lorkas]

Everyone can work, but not everyone can think (figuratively speaking). It needs to be something like 5% inventors and 95% workers. The sad truth is, not everyone is ment to be important.

[Porch]

At 9/19/10 05:10 PM, Lorkas wrote: Everyone can work, but not everyone can think (figuratively speaking). It needs to be something like 5% inventors and 95% workers. The sad truth is, not everyone is ment to be important.

agreed

[Ryanson]

Hmm. Good question.

I think that without the inventor, the workers would not exist. The inventor is superior.

[XenonMonkey]

Hitler.