9-11 a hoax?

[trigo]

an article here says that 9-11 hadn't actually happened. Pretty interesting stuff, i'm skeptical, but interesting nonetheless.

[RedSkunk]

No, it isn't a conspiracy.

[trigo]

At 4/3/04 08:56 PM, RoteStinktier wrote: No, it isn't a conspiracy.

hahahahahahahahahah

[IllustriousPotentate]

At 4/3/04 08:48 PM, implodable wrote: an article here says that 9-11 hadn't actually happened. Pretty interesting stuff, i'm skeptical, but interesting nonetheless.

There's also an article here that says that Princess Diana's dog planned the plot to murder her. But that doesn't mean it's real.

[Jimsween]

"The answer is that a cruise missile with a military hologram aboard crashed into the building."

Hahahaha.... I'm no conspiracy buff, but wouldn't it be easier to just wire some cemtex to the base?

[Stan]

At 4/3/04 08:48 PM, implodable wrote: an article here says that 9-11 hadn't actually happened. Pretty interesting stuff, i'm skeptical, but interesting nonetheless.

If it didnt happen then tell me why my uncle is dead?
He died in the first building that got hit his office was whear the plane hit. dose that site tell you whear he or anyone else could be?
My other uncle was in the streets on that day he said he saw the plane fly right in to it.

[JoS]

I think the original theory is that the Pentagon was not hit by a 747 or whatever but a cruise missle and the plane coasted to a near-by airfield via remote control. The people on the plane were mostly in the witness relocation program so who are they gonna tell? This was due to a lack of wreckage on the lawn, no markings from the engines scrapping the turf, and the size of the hole and impact area. The planes scrambled to intercept the plane bound for the Pentagon were launched from an airbase farther away than Andrews (just outside Washington, which keeps two squads on standby for intercept 24/7). The base they launched from has no planes on stand-by, and they did not go at top speed.

[Locke666]

No, the whole cruise missle thing is a load of bs. What you should really be looking at is the fact that flying a plane that size into a relatively small target (believe it or not a building is a small target for a 747) takes what amounts to military flight training. Now another interesting thing that people seem to have "neglected" is the fact that all but 2 (or 3 im not quite sure) of the hijackes were saudi. Yes our heavily militant ally saudi arabia who we sell airplanes to. And unless im mistaken al quaeda was based in afghanistan. Add in the fact that Bush has been able to do whatever he wants with the world by using three letters and a slash and the conspirarcy nuts dont even need the whole holographic technology crap to see a conspiracy.

[JudgeDredd]

At 4/3/04 10:28 PM, ineffable_fetus wrote: "The answer is that a cruise missile with a military hologram aboard crashed into the building."

Hahahaha.... I'm no conspiracy buff, but wouldn't it be easier to just wire some cemtex to the base?

Easier maybe. Convincing no.

Do you ever consider that the US military has made technology and weaponry that's not widely reported on? What would be the best time to use such technology? In a foreign country where enemy agents could get their hands on it, or right in your own back yard with greatest effect on national pride, and every opportunity to clean up = cover up.

And have you ever considered that the Pentagon ever made a contingency plan for a massive terror attack on a major city?
-- PLZ don't dismiss the fact that those boffins get paid BILLIONS over many decades just to make detailed contingencies.. PLZ don't dismiss that fact that modern warfare is so much more a media battle of public support than just finding and killing enemy combatants.

Conspiracy buffs are just like normal ppl, 'cept they have an open enquiring mind that's not so easily swayed by the plainly obvious (ie. shown repeatedly on TV news and generally swallowed whole as factual..)

[imgone]

No, its correct. The world trade center was teleported to sweden with all its workers and the planes were projections and none of the family members want to come back because they hated their families and swedens very nice in the fall.

[RedSkunk]

At 4/4/04 12:43 AM, Judge_Dredd wrote: Conspiracy buffs are just like normal ppl, 'cept they have an open enquiring mind that's not so easily swayed by the plainly obvious

I would say that conspiracy theorists are overly impressionable, and all you have to do is shove some 'intriging discrepancies' in front of them and they'll believe anything - as long as it was orchestrated by the government and scary agents in suits. But hey, that's just my opinion I guess.

[JoS]

At 4/4/04 12:41 AM, Locke666 wrote: Add in the fact that Bush has been able to do whatever he wants with the world by using three letters and a slash

Please enlighten us to which three letters you are refering to.

[RedSkunk]

At 4/4/04 12:58 AM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: Please enlighten us to which three letters you are refering to.

Hmm... Uhh... Err....

" WTC/ "?

[JoS]

Yes if he had just said three letters, but he said three letters and a slash. With a slash it would be 9/11 but 9 and 11 are not letetrs, they are numbers.

[Locke666]

Actually if anyone is interested there actually is holographics technology and it not all top secret goverment stuff. People can actually create holograms but you have to have at least 3 really big projectors projecting from different angles and none of the holograms are very good yet. So i think the cruise missle idea is out.

And if anyone cares the whole cloaking technology thing is also there except they use the slightly less cool industrial strength blacklights which are illegal, for very good reason too, those things are really powerful.

Also there are heat seaking bullets too. You can find this stuff out if you watch the history channel.

[Locke666]

At 4/4/04 01:03 AM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote: Yes if he had just said three letters, but he said three letters and a slash. With a slash it would be 9/11 but 9 and 11 are not letetrs, they are numbers.

Fuck did I put letters. Oh well u all know what i mean

[bumcheekcity]

Is 9/11 a Conspiracy they ask? I'd say no, again. And that site REALLY wasn't convincing. I was expecting the word 'aliens' to crop up any second.

[FootSoulJah]

Yes it was a hoax.... i belive you................................. weirdo

[CapitalistSocialist]

Don't worry David Blaine will come and say SHAZZAM! And the twin towers will magically re-appear.

[RandomFreak]

These conspiracy nuts crack me up sometimes... but this one just pisses me off.

[bumcheekcity]

At 4/4/04 09:53 AM, Jamstered wrote: Don't worry David Blaine will come and say SHAZZAM! And the twin towers will magically re-appear.

Yer, but they'll have been in transparent boxes for weeks and the poeple inside will be hungry.

[lifesukkss]

I don't think even the CIA are this paranoid

[trigo]

At 4/4/04 08:39 AM, isi wrote: pplppl.. should we really be worried if i t was a hoax, think about how many people died...

Holy shit, did you read the article? it doesn't say anything about people NOT dying, clearly people died, just not the way people were told. And a construction crew was sent in to get planes to melt down, before anyone was allowed to search for bodies!

"hoax"... HA HAAAAAAAAAA

A hoax is NOT a funny thing. I'm NOT laughing, i think you were mislead though.

it wasnt a fucking hoax asshole

you are blind, go to 911-hoax.com

[trigo]

At 4/4/04 12:18 AM, saterday wrote: If it didnt happen then tell me why my uncle is dead?

Your uncle was bombed, and im sorry to say it.

He died in the first building that got hit his office was whear the plane hit. dose that site tell you whear he or anyone else could be?

dead

My other uncle was in the streets on that day he said he saw the plane fly right in to it.

911hoax.com , really. And im NOT saying its all true, im just saying its interesting. Damn im sorry for your uncle, but stop being a little bitch.

[Locke666]

Ok people its pretty obvious that a cruise missle with holograms didnt hit the world trade center. However have any of you thought that if there was going to be a big conspiracy it would be a lot easier to send in a bunch of dudes to hijak a plane and run it into a building. After all, they wouldnt be talking. And a cruise missle requires a lot more than a few physcos and plane tickets.

[Idiot-Finder]

At 4/3/04 08:48 PM, implodable wrote: an article here says that 9-11 hadn't actually happened. Pretty interesting stuff, i'm skeptical, but interesting nonetheless.

Well, ther's once an article reported that " Men in Black have seized the home security cameras " and " A woman is kidnapped by aliens ".

[EvilGovernmentAgents]

Why, oh ever why do we need one of these threads, every single freaking week?

I would prefer people explaining why it would be a hoax instead of linking to some lousy, misinformative, and worthless conpiracy website, thank you very much.

[BWS]

At 4/3/04 08:48 PM, implodable wrote: an article here says that 9-11 hadn't actually happened. Pretty interesting stuff, i'm skeptical, but interesting nonetheless.

Lets see...Conspiracy-net.com. Sounds like a reliable source to me! I mean, its written, so it must be true in that case. And if anyone disagrees they must be blinded by the media.

[Zalbun]

It happened. My Uncle's dead.

[EvilGovernmentAgents]

I had a stray rat the day of 9/11. It ran off in the direction of New York during 2 in the morning.

Poor poor rat.