Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/26/10 01:29 AM, Space-Whale wrote:

At 11/26/10 12:53 AM, Sekhem wrote: i've always understood

you're still attracted to animals you sub-human piece of shit

Hey, I found a funny little picture today, and I thought you might want to see it. I made it just for you, little Sekhem.

oh mr tony the tiger your dick is so big

At 11/26/10 01:21 AM, quagmire690 wrote:

At 11/26/10 12:56 AM, crazygiraffe wrote: How are animals sexy? I don't get it.

how are humans....

You make good points, but you only illustrate actions not apearance. Yeah, humans fuck up, but animals are also just as savage. I mean apearance wise, I don't see how it's attractive.

Eh, sorry for possible double post, but never mind. I don't really want to delve into it, and you already partially answered it with the last sentence.

Hey, Hyrcia, why are you so awesome?

And how did I not see this thread yet?

I used to watch this show when I was little
Long before I knew about furries or yiffing or shit like that. Occasionally, I find shows like this on TV late at night or plat awesome games like this or this and this awesome little gem right here. But alas and alack, the nostalgic feeling I once felt is gone. Tainted, by the fact that sad, strange ,socially inept individuals find this shit arousing.

Why is Lolicon so much more awesome?

At 11/26/10 04:15 AM, BaronVonBadGuy wrote: Why is Shotacon so much more awesome?

The same reason dogs kill cats.

I don't want to ask a question, I just want to say that I find more zoophiles of more sound mind, considering that they actually have attractions to something that is real at least.

When the thing that causes you your biggest boner is something that doesn't exist, couldn't exist without being some horribly cruel gone wrong experiment in a lab which gets shot and burnt so that no one from the press can uncover the horrors of its mutanted life, well I think you have issues then.

So um... do you like wear fursuits and all that shit?

From what I know, furries are just people who like anthropomorphic (woah, did I actually spell that?) animals.

Then, because of rule 34, people started to introduce adult stuff....

But really, it started innocently, but since the rise of the internet, porn got mixed in..
(Actually, it gets mixed into everything, rule 34..)

Thus... Yiff! And the negative stereotype that furries fuck animals.

All i see in this thread are furries refusing to acknowledge their own actions and behaviors and creating an image based on comparisons to reality. You mask the negatives (and boy are there a lot) with shoddily put together examples of how a furry is "good." You ignore the fact that anthroposhizlic animals are still animals to that core. It does not matter if they are anything else. They are animals. You are a zoophiliac. The only difference between you and a bestiality sick fuck is that you don't got the balls to stick it in your dog. I saw an argument explaining the carnal aspects of the "fandom" and this only goes on to further argue the fact that you are a zoophiliac. As if marking it as carnal would even be a good thing... It only makes you sound like a deviant, someone that I would be afraid to let around my children.
A broken record plays, skipping and skipping along its track, "Different, comparisons, not all, lifestyle, fetish, art, pornography."
"Oh the fandom is not like that at all! Its not about sex!" exclaimed the deviant newgrounder, immediately after exposing his pornography collection to the world.
"how are humans sexy? they burn they destroy they ruin the world around them, all for pleasure and or greed... " Furry failing to recognize that he is in fact, a before mentioned Human.
"... it ... feels... right." Furries providing drama, naturally.

It doesn't matter what form of furry YOU are. It doesn't matter what YOU do. Its what your damned community does. Its what keeps YOU down.

At 11/25/10 10:07 PM, HeavyMetalGuy wrote: Exactly.

Being a furry isn't about jacking to furry porn or fucking people/animals in a fur suit. It's about the idea of anthropomorphic animals, and is in so way supposed to be a sexual thing, like so many of you ignorant fucktards believe. In fact, only about 20% of the furry fandom fur suit, and almost all of them do it for conventions. Not sex.

At this time furries do not have a strong control over the definition of themselves. Because a percentage (An actually incredibly high one at that) exists that are sexual deviants and offenders, it tarnishes the entire group. You want your shabby fandom to ever look like a constructive, decent, human fandom, then i highly suggest fixing your own fan base and becoming the "ideal furry."(You know, the pariah that does nothing wrong or foul?)

Examples of anthropomorphism are everywhere. Take Looney Tunes for example. Almost every cereal mascot like Tony the Tiger etc. Any of you furry haters who eat Frosted Flakes are just being hypocrites.

There is a line between anthropomorphism and furries. Furries take the very essence of innocence provided by mascots and cartoons, and twist them into the scandalous wreck that is the furry fandom. You guys act like the mascots are corporeal entities capable of choice and reason, its the person that ruins the image.

Point in case. Many of the furry haters here and anywhere else need to get your facts straight before you judge all of us for fucking in fur suits and other stupid shit, without knowing what you're talking about.

Its a sad truth, but most "furry haters" are more accurate in their beliefs than any furry. The typical furry veils the truth and creates a false image to represent the fanbase, when in reality, they are no different than any other member of the damned community. Sin and drama reek from every member, and its no surprise. I would very much like to see one member of the community who is a legal adult who is the magical pariah of the perfect furry.

Now I am half sure this is grammatically fucked/convoluted/flying over your head so i apologize for that.
TLDR: Its your fault, you sick bastard.

At 11/27/10 04:26 AM, 0gg-the-Gnome wrote: Now I am half sure this is grammatically fucked/convoluted/flying over your head so i apologize for that.
TLDR: Its your fault, you sick bastard.

I don't know who you are but I just want you to know that I love you.

I haven't agreed this hard with a user before in a long time, and yes your response will 'go over the heads' of furries in denial but it truly is the truth.

To me, the furry fandom makes no sense biologically, and that's what we are all slaves to, our biological urges and instincts. To deny those natural desires and lust for something that not only isn't real, but would be an incredible violation of every biological law as we know if they did exist. Well to lust, to long after that and not humans tells me that you've got to be pretty fucking gone in the head really.

At 11/26/10 04:15 AM, BaronVonBadGuy wrote: Why is Lolicon so much more awesome?

From that picture, that's pretty much childpr0n.

At 11/27/10 05:07 AM, crazygiraffe wrote: From that picture, that's pretty much childpr0n.

If you're a retard that can't draw a distinction between animation and reality, then yes, you might be on to something.

hey guys give me attention based on my opinion COOL

Last time I checked furries didn't give a shit what others thought about their fetish. From my experience, apart from a few select examples, the lot of them are perverted to the core, but in the end that doesn't make them any less of a good person (unless you consider refraining from pornography of any kind/excepting a few cases being a good person, in which case you're living in an age gone by).

If you find it creepy, gratz. If you find it weird, and sickening, and downright illogical, gratz. But you really can't ask a furry to defend their fetish. That's... kind of impossible (although if you find me a fetish that can be legitimately defended I'll take that back).

At 11/27/10 07:31 AM, Lintire wrote: That's... kind of impossible (although if you find me a fetish that can be legitimately defended I'll take that back).

Well.. Personally, I have a foot fetish. This is the result of genitals and feet occupying neighboring regions of the somatosensory cortex and through neuronal crosstalk both feet and genitals elicit approximately the same response from me. *

*see Ramachandran's book Phantoms in the Brain. Human Nature and the Architecture of the Mind for the complete scientific explanation

So we got seriously a discussion about ... furries ... .. .

At 11/27/10 07:56 AM, Sekhem wrote:

*see Ramachandran's book Phantoms in the Brain. Human Nature and the Architecture of the Mind for the complete scientific explanation

You like feet because it feels as good as stroking your dick. Whoop whoop.

At 11/27/10 08:01 AM, Lintire wrote:

At 11/27/10 07:56 AM, Sekhem wrote:

*see Ramachandran's book Phantoms in the Brain. Human Nature and the Architecture of the Mind for the complete scientific explanation

You like feet because it feels as good as stroking your dick. Whoop whoop.

lol

At 11/27/10 04:26 AM, 0gg-the-Gnome wrote: You ignore the fact that anthroposhizlic animals are still animals to that core. It does not matter if they are anything else. They are animals. You are a zoophiliac. The only difference between you and a bestiality sick fuck is that you don't got the balls to stick it in your dog.

Considering the furry porn drawings I have ever stumbled upon I would disagree with you. It might be I've only seen 'good' porn, but essentially the act of lovemaking is depicted in a 'human' way, rather than a bestial way. There are tits, pussy, penises and they hold on to classical human mating procedures.
For the stress to be on bestiality, the porn would stick to bestial genitalia and bestial mating styles. But this is not the case.

The stress, with furries, lies on fantasy. Furries don't care all that much about the bestial side of it, just the opportunity to pretend they are some other grander being, based upon the image of anime animal kingdoms. Hence not the stress on classical pet names, but an elevation to names of mythological nature.

As a fetish, it's not so much bestiality, but along the line of people who turn sci-fi and fantasy pornography.

^__^ xD x3 !!!! xd lol LOL 0.0 >w<

OP, I bet that's what you're like. If not, then FUK U UR NOT FURRFEG U FAKKEN GONA DIYE

At 11/27/10 04:26 AM, 0gg-the-Gnome wrote: Wisdom

I'd say that this guy is right, actually. Simplified enough, it's pretty much the same thing as zoophilia.

At 11/27/10 09:36 AM, ironraven24 wrote:

At 11/27/10 04:26 AM, 0gg-the-Gnome wrote: Wisdom

I'd say that this guy is right, actually. Simplified enough, it's pretty much the same thing as zoophilia.

I disagree. Yiff still has human genitals, albeit covered in fur.
Zoophilia is when one is attracted to animal genitals.

Either way, it is still disgusting.

If you find a real life animal that is similar to one you dress up as, or that someone you know dresses up as, then would you be attracted to it?

Why do you wear furcoats and animal suits and all of that kind of shit?

At 11/27/10 11:04 AM, TeHLoY wrote: I disagree. Yiff still has human genitals, albeit covered in fur.
Zoophilia is when one is attracted to animal genitals.

Either way, it is still disgusting.

Ok, to the people who say that this is the reason why it isn't bestiality...
Last time i checked, my wang wasn't bleeding raw and coming out of some fucked up pee hole. I don't know about yours...

At 11/27/10 12:57 PM, quagmire690 wrote:

At 11/27/10 12:56 AM, orangekiller wrote: So um... do you like wear fursuits and all that shit?

stuff

I always thought that they wore fursuits because it's the closest they'll get to becoming their "fursonas". That's my theory.