Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/27/10 11:13 PM, TG99 wrote:

At 4/27/10 08:42 AM, bcdemon wrote:

At 4/27/10 12:02 AM, TG99 wrote: Gays are good. Each and every one of them.

So do you think those gay priest who diddle little children are "good"?

Those are pedophile gays. Pedophiles = bad. So I stand corrected....I think.

Pedophiles are just pedophiles... they are neither gay or straight because they are truly in their own category.

Just "pedophile" without the adjective.

Although, in terms of crime statistics, I remember reading on somebody's link on here on Newgrounds that adult male on prepubescent girl is more common than the others (versus adult male on prepubescent male, or adult female on prepubescent males and females.)

At 4/26/10 06:58 PM, RubberTrucky wrote: The only time when gays really bother me is when they're acting disgustingly flaming. You know, cossdressing and harassing other men and stuff.

Why does cross dressing even bother you?

At 4/28/10 12:03 AM, Memorize wrote:

At 4/26/10 06:51 PM, AlexMcGreagor wrote:

Gays, Good Or Bad?

Neutral...?

Yes and in between, is an option to support.

At 4/28/10 04:30 AM, drDAK wrote:

At 4/26/10 06:58 PM, RubberTrucky wrote: The only time when gays really bother me is when they're acting disgustingly flaming. You know, cossdressing and harassing other men and stuff.

Why does cross dressing even bother you?

It annoys me. It's like I start wearing big glasses, a lab coat and start flaunting random science terms because I studied a science. It's okay to be gay and it's not like it may not show at all or anything, but it's just stupid to start a whole comming out parade and make it look like being gay makes you all that special and different from anyone else.

I think cross dressing can be fun just to do it on special ocasions as a 'funny' charade. But it becomes stupid if you do it as a full time hobby. It's similar to furries, wear a fur suit a conventions, but don't do it every night you go out.

(also, most cross dressers make very manly and disgusting women)

Thing about cross dressers is that not all of them are gay. And usually only men get slapped with the label sometimes. I myself wear men's t-shirts and jeans much of the time because I find them more comfortable, but hardly anyone notices.

Should I man start walking about in high heels and a skirt he gets cocked eyebrows and labeled a cross dresser despite possibly feeling more comfortable in women's clothing.

At 4/28/10 08:30 AM, sinfulwolf wrote: Thing about cross dressers is that not all of them are gay. And usually only men get slapped with the label sometimes. I myself wear men's t-shirts and jeans much of the time because I find them more comfortable, but hardly anyone notices.

Should I man start walking about in high heels and a skirt he gets cocked eyebrows and labeled a cross dresser despite possibly feeling more comfortable in women's clothing.

I feel there is a difference between women wearing men's clothes and men wearing dresses and skirts. In general mens clothes are for most unisex. Girls have pants and have T-shirts as well, so there is no real distinction there. (aside from the fact that a tuxedo kind of looks stupid on a girl anyway)

However, girlie clothes don't go with men ever, it's just wrong. And I hardly feel high heels are comfortable at all. The only thing that is comfortable about wearing a skirt+make-up+high heels is the physical feel of being feminine, which still is rather disturbing. It's a bit like a nudist. Sure, everyne has a right to prefer wearing nothing at all, but it is awkward to have a naked guy sitting next to you on the bus.

on the side: cross-dresser don't need to be gay, but I think there is a relation between being gay and cross-dressing.

At 4/26/10 08:17 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: Do you care to explain what a 'good' thing is.

Go home Socrates

At 4/27/10 06:57 PM, Ytaker wrote: opposite sex jobs
overwhelmingly left wing
less religious
less likely to pray, go to church
higher education
depression

Well, i don't have any STD's yet, and I can't make predictionss to how long I'll live (and I haven't had an IQ test), but that's kinda spot on.

No one seems to be saying they're bad here though.

Saying who's bad, exactly? Pedophiles? Gays?

Anyway, there's a difference between staright and gay pedophilia. Both are, of course, bad things, the former just more common, but the latter made a bigger deal of when it happens. And that's maybe a part of the stereotype. In the bad old days, when homosexuality was still illegal or classified as a mental illness, there'd be a lot of scandal in the local press if someone was caught with an underage boy, as compared to somebbody caught with an underage girl -- that and in many places the age of consent for gay sex was higher, too.

At 4/28/10 08:14 AM, RubberTrucky wrote: I think cross dressing can be fun just to do it on special ocasions as a 'funny' charade. But it becomes stupid if you do it as a full time hobby.

I can agree in this, unless you mean transgender people, because they're not crosdressers", they have gender identity disorder, and I support their right to correct their sex.

But yeah, people like Chris Crocker, one of the few people I seriously would call a faggot, they're annoying. They're doing the rest of us more harm than good.

At 4/28/10 11:15 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:
I can agree in this, unless you mean transgender people, because they're not crosdressers", they have gender identity disorder, and I support their right to correct their sex.

It's not like I'm going to say 'transgender operations should be abolished', however if one of my friends would tell me he wants to change his sex, I will not be saying 'oh wow, that's a great idea!'

At 4/28/10 11:15 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:

Well, i don't have any STD's yet, and I can't make predictionss to how long I'll live (and I haven't had an IQ test), but that's kinda spot on.

How many sexual partners have you had in the past year, and how often do you use drugs? Answer those, and you'll know the answer.

One important thing is that there's a small population, maybe 10%, of gay people who use a huge amount of drugs, have hundreds or thousands of sexual partners. They screw up your averages a lot, and worsen the dating pool substantially by spreading disease. This sorta thing is less common among straight men, probably because only ones of exceptional charisma can regularly get sex from women on demand. If you're not one of the 10%, you'll be much better off, in terms of stds and life length.

http://inductivist.blogspot.com/2007/08/
gay-men-have-most-sex-partners-right.htm l

From this site again, you can see the average number of sexual partners is slightly higher for gay men than straight ones, but that there's a small population of 9.3% who has 10-100 sexual partners per year. That drags your average up. And that no lesbians have 10-100 sexual partners per year, less than straight women.

No one seems to be saying they're bad here though.

Saying who's bad, exactly? Pedophiles? Gays?

Gay people. Some people are trying to draw an association between raping children and being gay, which is a poor connection at best, but no one is just saying gay people are bad, as far as I can see.

At 4/28/10 10:32 AM, WaterShake wrote:

At 4/26/10 08:17 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: Do you care to explain what a 'good' thing is.

Go home Socrates

Zing! That's what you get for answering questions with questions!