Men > Women

[Cootie]

This may be true. I love women and don't really think less of them as a man, which I think sexism is dwindling away. Women can run a company as well as a man, and compete with them in grades. So yes NG they can do more than fix a sandwich.

BUT... Men have superior strength on average and thats a fact. So even if we were equal in smarts that would mean we are superior because we are equal on one thing and better at another. Also we have on average a higher IQ. Look it up.

As for reproduction, isn't science closer to making something the sperm can grow into a baby inside (like giving nutrients and a hospitable environment) than artificially creating a sperm cell?

[SolidPantsSnake]

The gene that determines a gender for a man is the XY gene.

Females Gender determining Gene is XX, making them genetically superior to men.

Females also tend to live longer as well. Men are more commonly born than women.

[SirWolfy]

You're gay.

jk

[Cootie]

At 4/2/10 07:56 AM, SolidPantsSnake wrote: The gene that determines a gender for a man is the XY gene.

Females Gender determining Gene is XX, making them genetically superior to men.

Females also tend to live longer as well. Men are more commonly born than women.

They have yet to determine if there longer life comes from genetics or men holding in emotions and having unhealthy diets and habits.

[HTID]

At 4/2/10 07:52 AM, Yamor wrote: This may be true. I love women and don't really think less of them as a man, which I think sexism is dwindling away. Women can run a company as well as a man, and compete with them in grades. So yes NG they can do more than fix a sandwich.

But if that's what they are best at, why undermine their skills?

BUT... Men have superior strength on average and thats a fact. So even if we were equal in smarts that would mean we are superior because we are equal on one thing and better at another. Also we have on average a higher IQ. Look it up.

So now your argument is based around "survival of the fittest"? In that case, the future would be filled with people with more brawn than brain. We live in an age where information and technology runs the world, so bringing in the physical aspect is redundant.

As for reproduction, isn't science closer to making something the sperm can grow into a baby inside (like giving nutrients and a hospitable environment) than artificially creating a sperm cell?

The only thing women need us for (in regards for reproduction) is the sperm. With the wonders of IVF and such, men are apparently becoming obsolete in this department. The only reason we still are prevailing over science is because science doesn't have 12 inches of meaty goodness.

[SirWolfy]

The only reason we still are prevailing over science is because science doesn't have 12 inches of meaty goodness.

Win.

[Trystlions]

Perhaps so, yet if there were no women then there could be no men.

As such, neither is superiour to the other

[Cootie]

At 4/2/10 07:59 AM, HTID wrote:

At 4/2/10 07:52 AM, Yamor wrote:

The only thing women need us for (in regards for reproduction) is the sperm. With the wonders of IVF and such, men are apparently becoming obsolete in this department. The only reason we still are prevailing over science is because science doesn't have 12 inches of meaty goodness.

In my case it is 13 inches of hard meaty goodness. His name is Tim.

[HTID]

At 4/2/10 08:00 AM, Yamor wrote:

In my case it is 13 inches of hard meaty goodness. His name is Tim.

Now put yourself in the woman's thousand-dollar pair of shoes: would you rather injecting sperm via IVF using a cold, thin needle or getting your brains fucked out by a thick, warm meatsword and producing a baby as a bonus?

[Raab]

The problem with women is that they want to be treated equal with men, when they are PHYSICALLY different from them.

EXAMPLE:

If a local fire station is hiring a new employee, and both a man and a woman apply, who do you think will get the job?

Answer:
The most qualified individual.

If the man is capable of rushing into a house fire, lifting a full-grown man (an unconscious burn victim perhaps) over his shoulder, and leaving unscathed, he will get the job.

The woman, due to physical differences, is unable to do so. She is much smaller than the man, is unable to carry a full-grown man, and will not get the job.

But most of the time women fail to see the simple and innate differences between men and women and play the "sexist" card.

For this reason, under-qualified individuals (women) are taking jobs away from qualified men every day.

Idk about you.... but I want the incredible hulk to come save me if im in a burning building..... not the bitch from clueless.

Another example is-- When I was working as a security guard, my female supervisor needed to call for a male backup because she was unable to apprehend a disorderly gentleman on her own.
If a man had the job the situation would have been under control.

Don't get me wrong.... there are some pretty strong women in the world... but the reality of the situation is that they are not the ones taking over.

Don't cry for equal rights if we are innately "not equal."

[Jonners]

At 4/2/10 07:56 AM, SolidPantsSnake wrote: The gene that determines a gender for a man is the XY gene.

Females Gender determining Gene is XX, making them genetically superior to men.

That makes no sense. At all.

[SirWolfy]

At 4/2/10 08:06 AM, HTID wrote:

At 4/2/10 08:00 AM, Yamor wrote:

In my case it is 13 inches of hard meaty goodness. His name is Tim.

Now put yourself in the woman's thousand-dollar pair of shoes: would you rather injecting sperm via IVF using a cold, thin needle or getting your brains fucked out by a thick, warm meatsword and producing a baby as a bonus?

I'm already there.

[Noonga]

Apparently the female chromosome is becoming more common than the male chromosome and that in the near future there may be more females than males.
Then again there are countries like China that get rid of female babies so who knows.

[Lintire]

It usually appears that Guys needs Girls a lot more than the vice and versa.
Besides, it's the internet. Good sodding luck telling which from what.

[HTID]

At 4/2/10 08:09 AM, SirWolfy wrote:

I'm already there.

A few mentions of penises and you're more horny than a 12 year old who just learned how to spell "redtube".

[HTID]

At 4/2/10 08:14 AM, The777Demon wrote:

At 4/2/10 08:00 AM, Yamor wrote:

In my case it is 13 inches of hard meaty goodness. His name is Tim.

Your profile says you are a male so that makes time your gay lover.

You should see how hard he butt-rapes that clock.

[Lintire]

At 4/2/10 08:21 AM, The777Demon wrote:

At 4/2/10 08:19 AM, HTID wrote:

At 4/2/10 08:14 AM, The777Demon wrote:

At 4/2/10 08:00 AM, Yamor wrote:

In my case it is 13 inches of hard meaty goodness. His name is Tim.

Your profile says you are a male so that makes time your gay lover.

You should see how hard he butt-rapes that clock.

Why would i wanna watch that shit?

Because damn, it makes for a great conversation starter at his mother's funeral =3

[HTID]

At 4/2/10 08:21 AM, The777Demon wrote:

Why would i wanna watch that shit?

It's like 2girls1cup. You don't wanna watch it, but sooner or later, curiosity will get the better of you.

[sinfulwolf]

At 4/2/10 08:09 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: The problem with women is that they want to be treated equal with men, when they are PHYSICALLY different from them.

EXAMPLE:

If a local fire station is hiring a new employee, and both a man and a woman apply, who do you think will get the job?

Answer:
The most qualified individual.

If the man is capable of rushing into a house fire, lifting a full-grown man (an unconscious burn victim perhaps) over his shoulder, and leaving unscathed, he will get the job.

The woman, due to physical differences, is unable to do so. She is much smaller than the man, is unable to carry a full-grown man, and will not get the job.

But most of the time women fail to see the simple and innate differences between men and women and play the "sexist" card.

For this reason, under-qualified individuals (women) are taking jobs away from qualified men every day.

Idk about you.... but I want the incredible hulk to come save me if im in a burning building..... not the bitch from clueless.

Another example is-- When I was working as a security guard, my female supervisor needed to call for a male backup because she was unable to apprehend a disorderly gentleman on her own.
If a man had the job the situation would have been under control.

Don't get me wrong.... there are some pretty strong women in the world... but the reality of the situation is that they are not the ones taking over.

Don't cry for equal rights if we are innately "not equal."

Indeed, this is true. However, there are a great many men these days who are overweight, and not very strong, whereas I've also seen many women who were quite strong and very much capable of doing a physical job like a fire fighter. Just because its a woman wanting to get the job of firefighter, it does not mean its the chick from clueless.

I am very much a supporter of equal rights, however this also means that for physical jobs like firefighters and the military, women should be held to the same physical standard as the men, not lessened, and its very much possible for a female to meet these requirements.

However, it is also good to have females in positions such as security guard and military. They are able to search other females without causing as much of a possible incident than if it were a male. Example: In Afghanistan, Canada uses female infantry soldiers to search the female locals so as not to piss off the males and elders of a village and create an incident.

This also works well here in North America, especially going into somewhere where one must be searched, a female searching a female and a male searching a male is a more effective method of side stepping any incidents than if it were only males.

[Aigis]

At 4/2/10 07:56 AM, SolidPantsSnake wrote: The gene that determines a gender for a man is the XY gene.

Females Gender determining Gene is XX, making them genetically superior to men.

Wow. This argument is so flawed it's ridiculous.

Not only do you not understand what the difference between a 'gene' and a 'chromosome' is, you never said why XX is better than XY.

It's like saying 'Men are men. Women are women therefore they are genetically superior to men.'

[SirWolfy]

At 4/2/10 08:13 AM, HTID wrote:

At 4/2/10 08:09 AM, SirWolfy wrote:

I'm already there.

A few mentions of penises and you're more horny than a 12 year old who just learned how to spell "redtube".

I learned how to spell redtube at 7.

[rubberducky7]

It's all genetics from when we were cave men, men are sopposed to be the hunters and protecters while the women raise the children. Men are also desighned, however, to have try to have sex with anyone in sight and the woman are supposed to sift through the crap and choose the best one. The same for (almost) all the animals

[HTID]

At 4/2/10 08:42 AM, rubberducky7 wrote: Men are also designed, however, to try to have sex with anyone in sight and the woman are supposed to be in the kitchen.

Fixed*

[Running-Water]

This is some bullshit right here.

[MALICE24]

here is the reason why woman are better than man. two words, vagina. boobs. case closed

[Evark]

Actually, there are more women than men in the world. As a result of women having a smaller frame, greater consciousness of body image, societal prejudice toward keeping them from injurious work, etc. they have a greater life expectancy than men.

So your statement is false. Women are greater in numbers than men.

I can't stand the simplicity of your argument. Nevermind how petty it is to attempt to prove gender superiority.

[schadow-of-an-angel]

Indeed, this is true. However, there are a great many men these days who are overweight, and not very strong, whereas I've also seen many women who were quite strong and very much capable of doing a physical job like a fire fighter. Just because its a woman wanting to get the job of firefighter, it does not mean its the chick from clueless.

A fat man is a stereo type and i know a lot of fat woman's two. If there is a fire i think a fat person would be able to carry someone out a building but a skinny person would most likely fail so i rather have fireman to be to fat then to skinny.

I am very much a supporter of equal rights, however this also means that for physical jobs like firefighters and the military, women should be held to the same physical standard as the men, not lessened, and its very much possible for a female to meet these requirements.

k same standard for both genders and all races is good.

However, it is also good to have females in positions such as security guard and military. They are able to search other females without causing as much of a possible incident than if it were a male. Example: In Afghanistan, Canada uses female infantry soldiers to search the female locals so as not to piss off the males and elders of a village and create an incident.

This also works well here in North America, especially going into somewhere where one must be searched, a female searching a female and a male searching a male is a more effective method of side stepping any incidents than if it were only males.

Don't you think it will still piss them off coz your still searching them.

And when people say i want (some group) to be more equal, the problem is that when people reach equal they are not gonna c that they are equal and want to be better then so they are doing exactly the same to the people outside their group. I don't think anyone really still looks at gender when looking for someone to fill a job. Also if we are a equal to each other in every way then aren't we destroying individuality? Sometimes its good that one group of people is a bit different otherwise there is no individuality.

[killer32]

i think you guys should go here

[schadow-of-an-angel]

At 4/2/10 10:58 AM, killer32 wrote: i think you guys should go here

i think we need to go here

[SirWolfy]

At 4/2/10 09:08 AM, MALICE24 wrote: here is the reason why woman are better than man. two words, vagina. boobs. case closed

Case closed due to AIDS.