Is Sonic (2006) that bad

[omega88x]

Because im considering getting it, I heard about the load times being long but im patient. Besides that what else made this game bad to others.

[The-Great-One]

At 2/28/10 01:13 AM, omega88x wrote: Because im considering getting it, I heard about the load times being long but im patient. Besides that what else made this game bad to others.

Not sure. I've considered getting it myself.

[gmanthesandwhichking]

Which one are you talking about? Heroes?
Heroes was AWFUL. The load times were pretty long and the combat slowed down the gameplay. Normally slowing down the gameplay wouldn't be too bad, but in a game series that is all about speed slow gameplay can be the worst thing ever. And at some points you'll get stuck and not even know what the fuck to do so you just have no choice but to turn it off. The character movement can fell a little to floaty and you'll end up dying a lot because of this.
Another thing that bothered me is that Eggman is Dr. Robotnik I believe and that little thing just pissed me off.
All in all it was a terrible game.

If you want to pick up a good Sonic game get:
The Sonic Mega Collection Plus
Sonic Adventure 2 (if you have a Gamecube or Dreamcast to play it on)

[omega88x]

At 2/28/10 02:57 AM, gmanthesandwhichking wrote: Which one are you talking about? Heroes?

No im talking about the remake for PS3 and 360

[tokillarockingbird]

Sonic 06 has a bad story, slow gameplay, game killing glitches and a human chick kissing a dead Sonic. It's considered one of the worst games of all time.

but if you really want it, get it

[ever-vigilant]

I personally enjoyed alot of sonic games that most people hated such as Hero's, Adventure Battle 2, even the Shadow game but the Sonic game on the 360/PS3 is awful. If you really want to get it then don't spent mor than £5 on it (10/15 $'s I think) but it is a great letdown (not as much as that werehog shit in its defence)

[tokillarockingbird]

The werehog wasen't that bad. It just had awarkward controls at times and wasen't as fun as running fast, other than that it's okay.

[ever-vigilant]

At 2/28/10 09:48 AM, magicJack wrote: The werehog wasen't that bad. It just had awarkward controls at times and wasen't as fun as running fast, other than that it's okay.

Allright I will admit that the high speed running sections were a blast but the rest of it left too much of a bitter taste in my mouth for my liking.

[Maverick-Alex]

The music is the only redeeming feature.

[gmanthesandwhichking]

At 2/28/10 03:09 AM, omega88x wrote:

At 2/28/10 02:57 AM, gmanthesandwhichking wrote: Which one are you talking about? Heroes?

No im talking about the remake for PS3 and 360

Well, then read what I said about Heroes, it's basically the same thing just without those gay ass teams.

[dmansland]

At 2/28/10 11:54 AM, gmanthesandwhichking wrote:

At 2/28/10 03:09 AM, omega88x wrote:

At 2/28/10 02:57 AM, gmanthesandwhichking wrote: Which one are you talking about? Heroes?

No im talking about the remake for PS3 and 360

Well, then read what I said about Heroes, it's basically the same thing just without those gay ass teams.

God you're an idiot. Heroes wasn't good, but not bad either, just a mixed bad. Same with Sonic 06. I did enjoy that game but it does have a lot of glitches, loading times for EVERYTHING (including in game conversations, just 1 city mission has 3 or 4 load screens) low framerate when multiple things are on screen. If you're like me, and can tolerate thing things, then it's not that bad. The level design is ok, music is great, Silver is original for the Sonic series, i suggest you rent it though. Don't buy it, you will return it once you're done.

[KeithHybrid]

It's bad, but it has some merits. You can find it in a bargain bin, these days.