Why would you -Not- be a good Mod.

[Blounty]

I don't think I would be a good Mod as I get annoyed at some of the users on here very quickly and would end up banning them because they annoy me.

Why would you not be a good mod?

[TheSporkLord]

Because I would show up Poozy

What?

[Pink-Ninja]

I have no internet at home at the moment. Pretty sure that would make me a shit mod.

[HeartbreakHoldout]

I'd make them all look bad. I refused to tell them the ancient secrets of moderation I learnt in the deepest depths of the internet, and they've held a grudge ever since. They couldn't handle the fact that my milkshake brought all the boys to the yard.

[ChampionAnwar]

At 1/5/10 03:19 PM, Otto wrote: I wouldn't bother deleting spam threads, especially if they're funny.

Pretty much this. .

I'm probably not gonna be a mod, so whatever.

[Ass-Crumb]

I wouldn't be a good mod because I probably wouldn't do much. I'd probably lock a few threads, but other than that the golden aura would just be for show. I'd probably just post regularly, only banning people when it's obvious they need to be banned. Like for spamming or something.

[studmuffin7]

I would ban all the other mods simultaneously so nobody is capable of banning me. Then I would IP ban anyone who is atheist or follows a false religion. Come to think of it, I would actually make a pretty good mod.

[Sh0T-D0wN]

At 1/5/10 03:15 PM, Blounty wrote: Why would you not be a good mod?

Because I'd lock every new thread bitching about religion.

[TheSporkLord]

At 1/5/10 03:24 PM, studmuffin7 wrote: I would ban all the other mods simultaneously so nobody is capable of banning me. Then I would IP ban anyone who is atheist or follows a false religion. Come to think of it, I would actually make a pretty good mod.

A mod can't ban a mod.

[Oliver]

I'd give rediculously long ban times for the smallest of things.
Such as sneezing.

[Luke]

I would be a flawless mod.

[Hedzshot01]

I'd ban every single person who quoted someone using the 'blush' or 'Kissing' emote with some kiss ass, suck up, cock sucking sentence.

[TheSporkLord]

At 1/5/10 03:29 PM, Lagamuffin wrote: I'd give rediculously long ban times for the smallest of things.
Such as sneezing.

But how would you know when they sneezed?

[STEM]

At 1/5/10 03:31 PM, TheSporkLord wrote: But how would you know when they sneezed?

mods have access to tools you couldn't even come up with in your wildest of dreams

[UberCream]

At 1/5/10 03:32 PM, STEM wrote:

At 1/5/10 03:31 PM, TheSporkLord wrote: But how would you know when they sneezed?

mods have access to tools you couldn't even come up with in your wildest of dreams

Could you give us a_... AH!... AH-CHOO!

Sorry.

Could you give us an example?

[HazeStigma]

I'd probably hardly ever give out bans unless completely awarenesses, or only lock threads that have been fulfilled (Like, question threads)

And i'd feel guilty about every ban i dished out

[STEM]

At 1/5/10 03:34 PM, UberCream wrote: Could you give us an example?

I won't say what it does but it hasn't been used by anyone for quite some time, and we'd like to keep it that way

[Toukeman]

I would be a horrible mod because I would lock all of Twilight's, TheSlapHappy's, Gagsy's and demodded FUNKS threads upon creation.

[LeNoir]

I might go overboard on some of the bans if I were mod. Especially because a lot of the spam threads here suck ass. Some are funny though.

[aListers]

Because I'm not mature and one of those things wade said to be a mod is to be mature. I'd end up panicing and not get the punishments right or somthing.

[Lorkas]

I wouldn't delete funny spam threads :(

[VitaminP]

At 1/5/10 03:40 PM, STEM wrote:

At 1/5/10 03:34 PM, UberCream wrote: Could you give us an example?

I won't say what it does but it hasn't been used by anyone for quite some time, and we'd like to keep it that way

I'd push that button

[Luke]

At 1/5/10 03:40 PM, STEM wrote:

I won't say what it does but it hasn't been used by anyone for quite some time, and we'd like to keep it that way

Why has the "EVERYTHING" link been clicked before?!

[UberCream]

At 1/5/10 03:40 PM, STEM wrote:

At 1/5/10 03:34 PM, UberCream wrote: Could you give us an example?

I won't say what it does but it hasn't been used by anyone for quite some time, and we'd like to keep it that way

My god... Such power does not belong in the hands of a mortal man.

[TheSporkLord]

At 1/5/10 03:40 PM, STEM wrote:

At 1/5/10 03:34 PM, UberCream wrote: Could you give us an example?

I won't say what it does but it hasn't been used by anyone for quite some time, and we'd like to keep it that way

Instant Permabans for everyone?

[STEM]

At 1/5/10 03:50 PM, EpicFail wrote: Why has the "EVERYTHING" link been clicked before?!

It opens up to a larger menu of options lols, I haven't actually used it :P

[Rig]

I think I would suck

[Luke]

At 1/5/10 04:05 PM, STEM wrote:

At 1/5/10 03:50 PM, EpicFail wrote: Why has the "EVERYTHING" link been clicked before?!

It opens up to a larger menu of options lols, I haven't actually used it :P

Ah, that's awesome. Must be fucking cool.

[blue-ice-cube]

At 1/5/10 04:05 PM, STEM wrote:

At 1/5/10 03:50 PM, EpicFail wrote: Why has the "EVERYTHING" link been clicked before?!

It opens up to a larger menu of options lols, I haven't actually used it :P

MIght you show us this ''menu'' of options?

[Grizzli]

You'd really have to put me in practice to find out.

hint hint