Whenever you see a girl looking at the camera all the time, or doing a routine porn thing, it isn't attractive, because it's too predictable. And a girl with big fake tits is predictable, too. So, when you see dumbasses buying The Sun for some page 3 girl, it's sick, because it's not even slightly sexy. It's overt, in-your-face, bland crap.
TV ads aren't even particularly subliminal (although it works on multiple levels simultaneously, for different people). Sometimes the TV will just literally say, "go and do this", and people are so locked-in these days that they'll do it, like complete sheep. This is a tight structure of entrapment. There is little room to move. It's like being tied together with a bullrope. And so, they're not even stupid. They're just locked into their daily routine of work. Their life is fragmented, such that whenever they have time to breathe, the product they're consuming must be dumbed-down and mass-marketed, otherwise they can't easily "jump into it". Now, the TV deliberately promotes the idea of people being stupid, so "smart people" think the masses are stupid. But then, all those people will do is get their own job and debt, so, they get tied into the structure too.
Now, going back to porn... if you have a girl who does an unpredictable routine, that is hot. Not a fetish, like feet, because that is just another pre-planned structure. It really sucks when they do a bit of ass, a bit of pussy, a bit of making out and a bit of blow job - that routine. Preferable to me is a spontaneous-type thing - and not some arty-farty crap, because that is another structure. What I'm after is on-the-go, whatever feels good-type stuff. Touching whatever part of the body you feel like at that moment, just digging in. This usually involves one person submitting while the other fulfils his/her desire, and then the other way round. That is true fulfilment.
It's like the structure of a family: either the man or husband goes to work, and the other one takes care of the kids. Feminists try to portray that as "sexist", but no: it doesn't have to be the woman that stays at home. As I said, it can be either way round. When two people are trying to do each other's jobs simultaneously, it is unproductive and "annoying". Just like in life: if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself. Bringing in other people just distorts the overall product. There is nothing more unattractive that a girl with fake-coloured hair, eye liner, some generic outfit, looking at the camera, with big fake boobs and a typical "stick it in my pussy" routine. That would only be attractive to someone who is limited in time, and maybe only gets to look at 5 minutes of porn a week - because they're so "busy" (of course, they're not doing anything important - just repetitive routines, so in fact, they're the ones who have "too much free time" - they just don't realise it). It's like how I naturally don't want to go to bed at a set time, or clean my teeth in the morning, or take showers, or put on a certain set of clothes. It just isn't natural. It's too restricted.