At 11/9/09 10:06 PM, Zoraxe7 wrote:
So there is no rule for somebody that doesn't believe in God to not believe in God?
You are using the word "rule" as in "by definition", I am talking about rules as in ways to live one's life. Not the same thing.
"1. to instruct in a doctrine, principle, ideology, etc., esp. to imbue with a specific partisan or biased belief or point of view."
"2. to teach or inculcate."
"3. to imbue with learning. "
I can indoctrinate people into believing that the Atlantic ocean is east of the USA coast by giving them a map.
But that's completely different from what you implied when you talked about the camp "indoctrinating children into atheism". For the example you just gave you chose "to imbue with learning" as your definition for indoctrination, whereas all the other times you've used it, it's been in the context of instructing principles and ideology.
So which are you accusing them of? Indoctrinating children with atheist ideology (in which case I would ask that you specify what atheist ideology actually is) or are you accusing them of simply teaching children about science? If the latter, what's the big deal?
But its not. And that's an opinion, and somebody can be indoctrinated into believing an opinion. Like the children in that camp.
Even though the camp itself holds a competition for children to try and disprove the existence of an invisible unicorn, which of course is impossible (because of the theistic "it exists outside of our logic" cop-out), and the conclusion that the children would come to is that it is impossible to disprove god.
That camp exists to install the incorrect belief that science and logic disprove God
Wrong. Read your own link. The camp does teach science which debunks creationism, but this does not have anything to do with whether or not god exists. Also refer back to the unicorn competition I mentioned.
What freedom of thought? The camp is there to encourage the campers to believe what they want them to believe, and that list of things stretches from secular humanism to agnosticism to atheism.
So far you've accused the camp of trying to "indoctrinate children into atheism" (even though you changed your definition of indoctrination at one point) and now you've changed your accusation again stating that the camp wants children to believe anything from atheism to secular humanism, even though you haven't bothered to say what you think the children are actually being made to believe.
From what I've read about the camp (I only found out about it today, but judging from what you've been posting I've probably read more about it than you have), it seems no more radical than a typical science lesson.
Do you really think the parents sent their children there just for camping? Normal camps do that perfectly well, and without the godless slant.
Maybe the parents would like their kids to get a well-balanced view on life, away from all the religious propaganda that the media and society shoves down their throats.