Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/30/09 03:22 PM, Mostasteless wrote: lmao, his name is professor nutt.

Let's hope he doesn't bust himself.

Well, giving unbiased advice is the scientist's burden. Somtimes people won't like what you have to tell them because they don't want it to be true.

Wait till some child psychologist suggests that consentiously sleeping with 12 year olds makes these children be more ready for future sexual relationships...

At 10/30/09 03:24 PM, Lost-Chances wrote: It's stupid, but it happens with a government corrupt to the very and utter core. I wish I could say something could fix it, but where there is power, corruption gathers.

thats where theres canada!

At 10/31/09 02:14 PM, RubberTrucky wrote: Wait till some child psychologist suggests that consentiously sleeping with 12 year olds makes these children be more ready for future sexual relationships...

or wait until you accept the facts and stop comparing it to something immoral, like murdering in the other thread

and MDMA isn't dangerous by itself, you'll only die from water intoxication, dehydration, mixing it with other drugs, or adulterants in ecstasy tablets, or something that isn't MDMA.. like PMA

At 10/31/09 02:19 PM, pr0ded wrote:
or wait until you accept the facts and stop comparing it to something immoral, like murdering in the other thread

See, it's controlversial because you think sex with underage is immoral. Now if this psychologists is telling the truth, should he be silenced because the truth is 'immoral'? Similar to this debate, I recall Wattson causing a commotion because he claimed that science shows that black people are really intellectual inferior to white people. Was all that commotion really necessary?

and MDMA isn't dangerous by itself, you'll only die from water intoxication, dehydration, mixing it with other drugs, or adulterants in ecstasy tablets, or something that isn't MDMA.. like PMA

I'm not here debating that issue, though..

Not to cause an uproar or anything, but couldn't it be that the police didn't want such a voice regardless of drugs' physical harm but for the surrounding problems that come with drugs such as addiction, criminal activities and possible mental/social problems that may be caused by regular use of illegal substances.

At 10/31/09 02:22 PM, RubberTrucky wrote:

See, it's controlversial because you think sex with underage is immoral.

well if you're all about 'behaving properly' like in that politics thread, than that should be properly immoral

At 10/31/09 02:25 PM, pr0ded wrote:
well if you're all about 'behaving properly' like in that politics thread, than that should be properly immoral

There's always that difference between what is a objective fact and what is a societies rule. Sure, farting is healthy, but farting at an intimate party is a faux-pas. Shouldn't stop a doctor from saying that a fart a day can keep the doctor away.

On a side note: no, I'm not personally interested into sleeping with minors.

Unless they are really hot of course ;-)

OMG WHAT AN ASSHOLE! My mom was eaten by CANNIBALS! IMA FUCKING FUCK HIM!