At 10/30/09 12:44 PM, GuntherHermann wrote:
You can have all the documentation in the world, but if the scientific experiments have been committed by biased people no blind or double blind tests in the world can save it from a peer review.
If you're trying to be biased, the best way is to omit everything that doesn't agree with your view and pump up everything that does. Considering that Morris has a fair bit of research papers to his name, I'm sure he would have been called out, which he has on a moral level, not scientific.
And a site which focuses entirely on one subject doesn't have any integrity at risk when passing its articles off as facts. You had it linked from an Islam site at first, which might have some more integrity, but nothing near that of a source which has integrity in multiple fields at stake, such as a news outlet or a mag.
No, but the man and his team, and the university they are affiliated with does.
You can't say it's strictly scientific and medicine related then to say it has corporate motives in the next sentence, either. Don't even joke about that. And why would you doubt the alleged Dr. Brian J. Morris is a Muslim unless you know him personally?
Brian J. Morris isn't typically a name associated with Islam, and he hasn't blown himself up. I was going out on a limb, pardon me for speculating on something trivial.
As far as the corporate motives go, bottom line is money, and there isn't much profit in dead people. My assumption of big business is that they want to keep people alive as long as possible so they can take more of their money.
Toenails for instance are a remnant of when our feet were hands and they serve no practical purpose. Why not just remove them with root and everything at birth? It would save you cutting toenails for your entire life and you would never risk having an ingrown toenail.
Because there is billions to be made from toenails, and the benefits of removing them don't vastly outweigh the long term benefits of keeping them. Unlike getting circumcised.
