Cod:mw2 Will Have Third Person Mode

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

yay?

Its multiplayer only though.

(btw this is my first thread so be nice if i did something wrong lol)

[MrPercie]

That seems unfair?

Third person ruined MGO because you couldnt tell if there was an enemy behind a wall yet he could still see you with out you seeing them, just unfair.

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

At 10/27/09 10:29 AM, MrPercie wrote: That seems unfair?

Third person ruined MGO because you couldnt tell if there was an enemy behind a wall yet he could still see you with out you seeing them, just unfair.

You cant which beetween them whenever you want

[milinko959]

Dumb idea. Just like the rest of the game.

[Jawdyn]

At 10/27/09 10:34 AM, milinko959 wrote: Dumb idea. Just like the rest of the game.

yeah. and whats up with black people?

[MrPercie]

At 10/27/09 10:34 AM, milinko959 wrote: Dumb idea. Just like the rest of the game.

well if that was the case the majority of children today are retards....

[Ecke]

It'll probably be restricted to 3 online playlists that GOW faggots gather in.

[idiot-monarch]

At 10/27/09 10:43 AM, MrPercie wrote:

At 10/27/09 10:34 AM, milinko959 wrote: Dumb idea. Just like the rest of the game.

well if that was the case the majority of children today are retards....

Well...

Yeah.

Anyway, this just seems pointless more than anything.

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

At 10/27/09 10:50 AM, Ecke wrote: It'll probably be restricted to 3 online playlists that GOW faggots gather in.

It will be like the 'hardcore' playlists.

I think its a good idea because once your bored with the normal mode you can change to this mode amd it will seem almost like a whole new game

[SlipperyMooseCakes]

I don't mind if they throw in an extra mode as long as the have the other ones. I can't say I will play it all too often but it is nice to have the option. I'm more interested in the Co-op mode.

[Final2Legion]

It says 3rd person will be restricted to special playlists. To bad Isdgaf

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

At 10/27/09 11:37 AM, Final2Legion wrote: It says 3rd person will be restricted to special playlists. To bad Isdgaf

It should be in campaign too.
but i guess that would 'break the immersion' just like a co-op campaign would.

InfinityWard are dicks

[ironraven24]

Yeah.. definitely not picking this up anymore, was really hyped earlier as well.

Activision can suck my dick.

[Jawdyn]

At 10/27/09 11:58 AM, ironraven24 wrote: Yeah.. definitely not picking this up anymore, was really hyped earlier as well.

Activision can suck my dick.

cool

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

At 10/27/09 11:58 AM, ironraven24 wrote: Yeah.. definitely not picking this up anymore, was really hyped earlier as well.

Activision can suck my dick.

You are not going to buy one of the best games of the year just because the added an extra feature?

Twit.

[DumbassDude]

At 10/27/09 11:58 AM, ironraven24 wrote: Yeah.. definitely not picking this up anymore, was really hyped earlier as well.

Activision can suck my dick.

So an optional, private match only perk really pisses you off so much?

How very petty and stupid of you, not to mention Activision has nothing to do with this game. Idiot.

[Legionnaire-X]

I lol at the people flipping out.

[MrPercie]

Well at least when people say " CoD is just generic FPS" I can say no. Its a TPS!!! (Third Person Shooter)

[ironraven24]

At 10/27/09 12:05 PM, SlipperyGooseCakes wrote:

At 10/27/09 11:58 AM, ironraven24 wrote: Yeah.. definitely not picking this up anymore, was really hyped earlier as well.

Activision can suck my dick.

You are not going to buy one of the best games of the year just because the added an extra feature?

Twit.

I'm not really talking about the 3rd person view, though that is a little dumb, nothing to cry over. Mostly the no dedicated servers for PC that make me not want to buy the game.

[MrPercie]

Why are you a hacker or something? This thing helps us track down assholes who cant play. I dont really know whats so great about dedicated servers but wouldnt make MW2 a bad game.

[killer32]

That seems unfair?

Third person ruined MGO because you couldnt tell if there was an enemy behind a wall yet he could
still see you with out you seeing them, just unfair.

yeah in half life 2 and counter strike source its considered a cheat <sarcasm> you know what, why stop
there they should put wallhack. /<sarcasm>

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

At 10/27/09 12:06 PM, DumbassDude wrote: private match only perk

It has it's own playlists too.

Am I the only one who thinks this is a great idea?

[YeOldeSierra]

At 10/27/09 12:06 PM, DumbassDude wrote: How very petty and stupid of you, not to mention Activision has nothing to do with this game. Idiot.

Activision publish the Call of Duty series. Infinity Ward and Treyarch develop the games. I believe that Activision own the rights to the Call of Duty brand, so they have a lot of control over how the game turns out.

This is something that just annoys me. Modern Warfare 2 is a hyped game, but it's overhyped. By the time it's released, everyone will likely know the story. I try to pass by any of the stuff about it, as it in the long run, knowing everything about the game will make it a less fun experience. There have been a lot of new features added to Modern Warfare 2, such as Akimbo (dual wielding pistols), and to be honest, I think none of them are going to add to the game. I'd rather have a couple of extra guns to unlock online, or an extra few missions to play, than the ability to wave two Desert Eagles around. The same applies to Third Person Mode. If I want Third Person, I can easily play Gears of War. Call of Duty has always been an FPS, and IMO, it should be kept that way.

[SlipperyGooseCakes]

I just realized that this will make red dot sights and every other scope or sight useless.

That's pretty bollocks.

[xscoot]

At 10/27/09 10:29 AM, MrPercie wrote: That seems unfair?

Third person ruined MGO because you couldnt tell if there was an enemy behind a wall yet he could still see you with out you seeing them, just unfair.

Uhh, no one, except snipers, uses first person in that game. So, if you try to use an assault rifel while in first person, then you are doing it wrong.

[MrPercie]

At 10/27/09 03:37 PM, xscoot wrote:

At 10/27/09 10:29 AM, MrPercie wrote: That seems unfair?

Third person ruined MGO because you couldnt tell if there was an enemy behind a wall yet he could still see you with out you seeing them, just unfair.

Uhh, no one, except snipers, uses first person in that game. So, if you try to use an assault rifel while in first person, then you are doing it wrong.

Your an idiot, I said THIRD person. Where you can look over your shoulder. No one used FP view unless it was sniping and even then they still used with out it. If you can look over your shoulder you can see whats coming but the enemy cant. This seemed unfair because in reality you would have to look to see them and if you didnt look you couldnt see them.

But MGO is a complete fail because of FragFX which replace's the PS3 controller with a mouse which makes aiming cake but made playing without it a complete pile of shit.

[xscoot]

At 10/27/09 04:29 PM, MrPercie wrote:

At 10/27/09 03:37 PM, xscoot wrote:

At 10/27/09 10:29 AM, MrPercie wrote: That seems unfair?

Third person ruined MGO because you couldnt tell if there was an enemy behind a wall yet he could still see you with out you seeing them, just unfair.

Uhh, no one, except snipers, uses first person in that game. So, if you try to use an assault rifel while in first person, then you are doing it wrong.

Your an idiot, I said THIRD person. Where you can look over your shoulder. No one used FP view unless it was sniping and even then they still used with out it. If you can look over your shoulder you can see whats coming but the enemy cant. This seemed unfair because in reality you would have to look to see them and if you didnt look you couldnt see them.

I know that. I just thought that if you were stupid enough to get killed by someone behind a wall so easily, you'd have to be playing in first person.

Sure, they can look around walls, but knowing this means that you better as hell not hug the walls when moving, and instead use different pathways instead of walking down the same place over and over again. They're just camping, same idea in CoD or Halo, or most shooter games. Besides, by doing this, any idiot can kill them from behind.

[MrPercie]

Yes but MGO is one of these annoying games because of no sprint option its hard to get out of combat and also if you get shot, you slow down for a second standing in the field of fire which is very annoying. (sure maybe if the shot you in the foot but If I got shot in the back with a kevalar vest although i may be shocked but doesnt mean i cant do a leap of faith). Also when there's many players online theres gunna be one behind every corner and even if you wait for them to come to you they frag ya 3 times, killing ya or leaving you worthless.

[GiantDouche]

Nope. Stupid idea. Try again Infinity Ward.

[Jawdyn]

At 10/27/09 05:43 PM, GiantDouche wrote: Stupid idea.

Elaborate