At 10/26/09 11:43 PM, PenguinKommando wrote:
There was a story of 4 kids in Connecticut or somewhere breaking into a house and murdering the occupants for fun, and then posting about it on facebook which is the only reason they got caught. They chose this house because it was in the wilderness and they knew they had a low chance of the police getting there in time. The kids all used knives, and I think in this case a gun would have been a great deterrent, although yeah I guess it could have gone awry, but I don't think the children would have tried to overpower someone pointing a gun at them, if they are only equipped with knives.
In this case, potentially a gun could have saved the homeowners. This assumes that they knew this was going to happen, let's say the homeowners did own a gun and did "protect" themselves, how could the intent of the people breaking in be proven? If you give people guns they're going to use them in a heated situation, police/army are trained to understand when to use a gun, the general public aren't. What if those kids had just been playing? For whatever reason they went into the house, okay sure they broke the law, but did they deserve to die?
In my mind there are so many more chances of it being a bad idea than a good idea. How many people every year break into someone's house with the intent of killing them? How many people break into houses with the intent of just stealing stuff?