At 10/26/09 02:07 PM, AapoJoki wrote:
At 10/22/09 05:00 PM, turboNEGROID wrote:
First of, why would they ask you if you "really are an atheist"? That is, unless you've been spouting it off in every which direction like a pretentious teenager. Second, why would you answer that unless you're a pretentious teenager eager to give your opinion on everything ever? They obviously had no right asking you and you should've kept it to yourself like a reasonable person.
Hey, I just wanted to say that you're a bigot, a moron and theocratic fascist. "Do you believe in God?" is a perfectly valid question and everyone who's not a pussy can be expected to give an honest answer to it. No one has any right to beat someone up just for disagreeing with them. Everyone should have the right to express belief or disbelief in anything, or any other opinions without fear of consequences.
People use logic like yours to justify terrorism and murder. I mean they're only asking for it if they express disagreement with your beliefs, right?
Yeah, I'm a theocratic fascist alright. Never in my posts have I supported theocracy or fascism, so you couldn't reasonably have deducted it from anything I've said on this site. Maybe you are some kind of psychic? Tell me more about myself, why don't you.
I never said anything about the validity of the question, I never even mentioned the question you're bringing up. And even if I had it has nothing to do with the reason I argued at all since my reason had nothing to do with the linguistic validity of the sentence. It has nothing to do with religion either, it has to do with what is personal.
Anyone who answers a question which is personal implies by answering it that they are confident that they are correct, which is an obnoxious and arrogant move. You don't argue with opinions or beliefs, you argue with facts. It's like arguing against creationism with intelligent design. The only standpoint which isn't arrogant is ignorant. The humble, civil man listens instead of speaking.
And I never said they had any right to beat him either, I never said he was asking for it by voicing his opinion. If anything I argued against their case, which you would've picked up if you paid any mind to what I said. How about you quit making up stupid shit like a jackass and address my actual points. Finally, all logic and rhetoric can be used to argue most any cases. Does that mean arguing with logic is for terrorists. It's far better than arguing with opinions and passion. The only thing more valid than logic is facts. I wouldn't expect you to know the first thing about arguing with logic, though. That's an opinion, observe how worthless it is and adds nothing at all to my post. That's what all your post is composed of.
Do you shave your pubes? How often do you shower? Have you ever fantasized about getting fucked in the ass? I'm under the perception answering these kinds of questions are your perception of the exercise which defines the pinnacle of manhood, seeing as not answering them makes you a pussy. Either that or you have an entirely different idea of what is personal and what is not. Do you think peoples' religious opinion has any relevance at all outside of their own homes? That would be odd, since you called me theocratic.
