The airforce's nickname chairforce

[HogWashSoup]

The Airforce has a nickname called the chairforce.

Other factions of the military give them this name because the airforce sits in chairs to do their work, unlike the other factions that will actually do shit, sometimes sit in a chair but not all the time.

So I was thinking, why not just not give respect to the airforce at all. No money no honors no anything.
They are the chairforce, who gives a shit about them.

[KillerSkull]

You don't get the point of those nicknames, do you?

They're jokes!!!!

[Jackdabomb]

Because then there would be no one in the airforce. The Airforce is more important than you think.

[brewbeer]

Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:03 PM, Jackdabomb wrote: Because then there would be no one in the airforce. The Airforce is more important than you think.

Totally, all branches of the military are equally important.

[Yacazuma]

At 10/13/09 08:02 PM, HogWashSoup wrote: Other factions of the military give them this name because the airforce sits in chairs to do their work, unlike the other factions that will actually do shit, sometimes sit in a chair but not all the time.

So I was thinking, why not just not give respect to the airforce at all. No money no honors no anything.
They are the chairforce, who gives a shit about them.

"Goddammit, there's too many of them! We need to call in an airstrike!"
...
"Where the fuck is that airstrike?! OH HOLY SHI-"

[The-Doctor]

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote: Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

hold on...

let me whip out my SAM

[Blush]

Dude, people say jokes like that all the time. That doesn't mean that you should take them seriously. Even if they are true.

especially about Marines :P

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:15 PM, The-Doctor wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote: Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

hold on...

let me whip out my SAM

SAM is not equal to fighter-fighter. As a matter of fact, SAM is not equal to 100% effective.

[The-Doctor]

At 10/13/09 08:17 PM, KillerSkull wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:15 PM, The-Doctor wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote:

let me whip out my SAM

SAM is not equal to fighter-fighter. As a matter of fact, SAM is not equal to 100% effective.

NG'ah please, two is plenty to get the job done

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:20 PM, The-Doctor wrote:

NG'ah please, two is plenty to get the job done

Besides, SAMs are limited in terms of altitude range, thus they are most effective against helicopters. Also, two equals one too many!

A thought just occured to me too, the crew manning the weapons in an AC-130 gunship are hardly ever sitting down, especially the ones manning the 105mm Howitzer.

[Chymeraxe]

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote: Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

Right away boss.

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:37 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote: Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

Right away boss.

Stinger missiles are designed just for helicopters dude.

[The-Doctor]

At 10/13/09 08:38 PM, KillerSkull wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:37 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote:

Stinger missiles are designed just for helicopters dude.

tell that to Solid Snake

[Smokinggun64]

Chairforce? Tell that to the PJs that are rescuing the Army and Marine guys, who by the why wouldn't be able to get their job done withouth air support.

[Chymeraxe]

At 10/13/09 08:38 PM, KillerSkull wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:37 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote: Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

Right away boss.

Stinger missiles are designed just for helicopters dude.

We'll just put it in the back then.

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:41 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

We'll just put it in the back then.

With no airforce there would be no need for AA guns, or in your case AA tanks. Anyways, what about bombing runs?

[Chymeraxe]

At 10/13/09 08:38 PM, KillerSkull wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:37 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:04 PM, brewbeer wrote: Alright, lets see the 'landforce' take down a damn MIG fighter plane shall we?

Right away boss.

Stinger missiles are designed just for helicopters dude.

Also tell that to the 270+ aircraft they've taken out.

Hey look a link.

[Chymeraxe]

At 10/13/09 08:44 PM, KillerSkull wrote: With no airforce there would be no need for AA guns

So you're saying the only reason we should have AA guns is because we have an Airforce?

Do you want us shooting friendlies?

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:45 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

Also tell that to the 270+ aircraft they've taken out.

Hey look a link.

Just because they are designed for helicopters does not mean it's IMPOSSIBLE to take out a fighter.

Also, FYI, helicopters fall under the category of aircraft.

[The-Doctor]

At 10/13/09 08:44 PM, KillerSkull wrote:

At 10/13/09 08:41 PM, Chymeraxe wrote:

We'll just put it in the back then.

With no airforce there would be no need for AA guns, or in your case AA tanks. Anyways, what about bombing runs?

I believe the original question was "Lets see the landforce take out a plane" and Chymeraxe seems to have provided proof

[Conspiracy3]

Flying a fighter jet is actually hard exhausting work. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to successfully maneuver a fighter jet while under 8gs of force?

[TrippingBallsYo]

Lol 30 minute limit.

At 10/13/09 08:47 PM, KillerSkull wrote: Just because they are designed for helicopters does not mean it's IMPOSSIBLE to take out a fighter.

Also, FYI, helicopters fall under the category of aircraft.

Which means that the 'landforce' can take out enemy aircraft not including helicopters and therefore I win.

Need more proof SUCK ON THE RAPIER MY GOOD SIR.

wutwutinthebutt

At 10/13/09 08:49 PM, The-Doctor wrote: I believe the original question was "Lets see the landforce take out a plane" and Chymeraxe seems to have provided proof

Gimme a brofist now come on you know you want to am I right yes I am.

[TrippingBallsYo]

At 10/13/09 08:56 PM, Conspiracy3 wrote: Flying a fighter jet is actually hard exhausting work. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to successfully maneuver a fighter jet while under 8gs of force?

And about 2% of the Airforce is actually filled with just pilots.

Not excluding gunships helicopters etc.

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 08:59 PM, TrippingBallsYo wrote:

Not excluding gunships helicopters etc.

Helicopters are flown by either the Army or the Navy and in some cases, the Marines.

[FatJoe214]

That's exactly why I wanna join them just sit around sippin a soda and drawing angryfaic

[Zombie-Toaster]

Want to know what the nickname for all of the foot infantry that's not in chairs? They're called cannon fodder.

[Evark]

I always found the acronym "My Ass Rides In Navy Equipment" to be pretty funny. Hooruh.

[KillerSkull]

At 10/13/09 11:13 PM, Evark wrote: I always found the acronym "My Ass Rides In Navy Equipment" to be pretty funny. Hooruh.

Hahaha, Marine (or as an acronym it'd be MARINE)!

Also, it's Oorah! But, whatever.

[KennyD]

At 10/13/09 08:40 PM, Smokinggun64 wrote: Chairforce? Tell that to the PJs that are rescuing the Army and Marine guys, who by the why wouldn't be able to get their job done withouth air support.

lol, the chairforce is scared of us Marines, down at my training school, the Airforce brass actually tells the enlisted to avoid interacting with Marines. Besides, Marines are the only branch that still carry bayonets. Its fucking hardcore.