Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Just stop. Halo is mainly for the Multiplayer. If it wasn't for that it wouldn't sell. I personally believe the campaign is crap. Even if you didn't play Halo 1 or 2 you should still have an idea of what's going on half way through. I didn't. Actually the multiplayer isn't that good anyway most people use the AR anyway even in ranked.

At 10/9/09 12:19 AM, ParadoxVoid wrote:

At 10/8/09 09:32 PM, Omega-Epsilon wrote: To be fair, you can't be hard on Microsoft and neglect the fact that there isn't a scenario that Mario hasn't been apart of.

Halo Tennis anyone?

Yes because that what every tennis player wants.. Wait I said something backwards there..

At 10/9/09 04:55 PM, captainchaos03 wrote: Just stop. Halo is mainly for the Multiplayer. If it wasn't for that it wouldn't sell. I personally believe the campaign is crap. Even if you didn't play Halo 1 or 2 you should still have an idea of what's going on half way through. I didn't. Actually the multiplayer isn't that good anyway most people use the AR anyway even in ranked.

This series should have ended at Halo 3. The Halo Wars and ODST just made the game unoriginal. Actually it became unoriginal after halo 2. The first one was the only one that I saw to be original. Halo 2 was just the generic human vs. alien warfare.

The only reason they aren't losing any money is because the people who obsess over its XBOX LIVE capabilities. Seems like BUNGIE is relying completely on LIVE to carry the series seeing as how the campaigns get worse with each addition to the series.

*Bashes head on laptop* This is why I dislike the Halo series. Alot.

NO!!!! WHEN WILL THE MADNESS END?!?!

Hey.
It's Microsoft.
Not bungie.
So, don't flame bungie anymore, guys.

Whoa, Halo 4 here we come.

At 10/8/09 10:21 PM, Eclipse914 wrote: This isn't a surprise, at all. Microsoft has been milking the franchise since they realized how many 8 year olds LUV HALO. I knew it wouldn't end after Halo 3, they make so much money off of it, that why stop there?

How the fuck is four (five if you count Halo Wars) games milking a franchise?
The Call of Duty series has how many games? Age of Empires, and it's spin-offs?
Command and Conquer? Final fucking Fantasy? Sonic?

God dammit, start having some independent thought when it comes to using the term 'milking the franchise'.

At 10/9/09 06:42 PM, Dr34m3r wrote:

How the fuck is four (five if you count Halo Wars) games milking a franchise?
The Call of Duty series has how many games? Age of Empires, and it's spin-offs?
Command and Conquer? Final fucking Fantasy? Sonic?

God dammit, start having some independent thought when it comes to using the term 'milking the franchise'.

i call it milking because its the same fucking game just slightly tweaked.

This reminds me of when Crash started going to shits after Naughty Dog left.
Probably gonna be the same case.

At 10/9/09 03:24 PM, UnknownFear wrote:

At 10/8/09 10:18 PM, SlipperyMooseCakes wrote: Even if the Halo franchised is "milked" they still put out quality games. All halo games have been 80+ on average and the main series were all 90+.

Don't get me wrong, I do like Halo, I may even get Halo ODST just for the fun of it, and Reach does sound interesting, but is there really any need for more than 5 Halo games?

Considering Halo 3: ODST has already made over 125 million dollars and sold almost 3 million copies so far....yes, yes there is.

At 10/9/09 07:37 PM, TheSporkLord wrote: i call it milking because its the same fucking game just slightly tweaked.

Go kill yourself if you think they are all the same.

At 10/9/09 07:38 PM, WeirdJamFace wrote: This reminds me of when Crash started going to shits after Naughty Dog left.
Probably gonna be the same case.

His latest games aren't too bad, Crash of the Titans was pretty good.

This doesn't mean a game every year.

At 10/8/09 09:32 PM, Omega-Epsilon wrote: there isn't a scenario that Mario hasn't been apart of.

He hasn't been a lawyer yet.

At 10/8/09 06:46 PM, UnknownFear wrote:

At 10/8/09 06:33 PM, explodingbunnies wrote: I said this when i heard they were continuing after Halo 3, and i was right, the worst part is, they can continue it, and make it more generic, and yet, they can NEVER lose money on a halo game.

I think they should just stop at ODST, even Halo: Reach, but honestly, 6 more years of Halo games?!?!? A little much.

There's no point in stopping. They can make themselves 3 times more rich. Some may not like the continuation but most will still end up buying the Halo games. So Bungie will profit and make more money.

I kind of just said what explodingbunnies did...