Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Sadly, we still don't have an edit button...

I have read the Turner Diaries. I just got done reading Hunter too.

I'd advise you to read Civil War 2, by Thomas Chittum.

Race is far more than skin pigmentation: it has a lot to do with skull shape, facial features, shape of the body, and many other way that we are wired, including intelligence and propensity to certain emotions over others. Culture is actually determined by genetics. Sure, you can train a person to behave in a certain way (such as myself), but in the end, they'll want to break out of that shell. It is very stressful to have to pretend to be something that you aren't (this also goes for Whites being PC and having to pretend to love Blacks).

At 10/7/09 06:13 PM, ViolentAJ wrote: Culture is actually determined by genetics.

could we rein in the crazy a little, please? thanks.

At 10/7/09 06:13 PM, ViolentAJ wrote: Sadly, we still don't have an edit button...

I have read the Turner Diaries. I just got done reading Hunter too.

I'd advise you to read Civil War 2, by Thomas Chittum.

Race is far more than skin pigmentation: it has a lot to do with skull shape, facial features, shape of the body, and many other way that we are wired, including intelligence and propensity to certain emotions over others. Culture is actually determined by genetics. Sure, you can train a person to behave in a certain way (such as myself), but in the end, they'll want to break out of that shell. It is very stressful to have to pretend to be something that you aren't (this also goes for Whites being PC and having to pretend to love Blacks).

Oh hey, you're that crazy racist guy that got banned a while back. Good times, bro.

Culture is defined by culture. Doesn't matter what race you are(well it does, but that's not my point), you're going to go with your culture. I don't mean to sound racist, but a lot of black people act alike because it's their culture. Same with most races, although with blacks it's more prominent because their skin tone is more different.

Culture isn't decided by genetics, otherwise we'd all be acting like cavemen.

Black or white or yellow or red, we're all dumbasses in the end, so shut up and deal with it.

When are you people going to learn to stop feeding AJ?

At 10/7/09 06:13 PM, ViolentAJ wrote: Sadly, we still don't have an edit button...

I have read the Turner Diaries. I just got done reading Hunter too.

I'd advise you to read Civil War 2, by Thomas Chittum.

Race is far more than skin pigmentation: it has a lot to do with skull shape, facial features, shape of the body, and many other way that we are wired, including intelligence and propensity to certain emotions over others.

All of them sounded fair until you mentioned intelligence and propensity.

Culture is actually determined by genetics. Sure, you can train a person to behave in a certain way (such as myself), but in the end, they'll want to break out of that shell. It is very stressful to have to pretend to be something that you aren't (this also goes for Whites being PC and having to pretend to love Blacks).

This, though, is entirely untrue. Look, for instance, at red-haired people compared to blonde-haired people. It would not be inaccurate to say that they are different races, as they have very different racial makeup both in skin pigmentation (as well as other skin features), hair color, and so on. However, both have been integrated into the same culture.

Culture is not determined by genetics, culture is determined by cultural history. In the United States, there has been a strong cultural history of racial tension due to the fact that the United States was built upon black slavery - black slavery, by the way, being a relatively new phenomenon in human history (until the 1500's, when the Portuguese and later Dutch started exploiting the African slave trade, slaves were historically conquered peoples from other cultures, often with the same racial makeup as the people who owned them.) The formative years of American history saw blacks being seen as slaves and slaves being seen as blacks - that is, blacks seen as inferior beings, no greater than beasts.

Look at blacks raised in other countries that are more accepting of them, such as France or the Netherlands, or even England to a degree, or look at blacks adopted by whites who traveled around. Nurture defeats nature in human behavior, my friend.

You had the misfortune of being raised in a place that held a great amount of animosity towards blacks, and that is a shame.

At 10/8/09 02:05 AM, aviewaskewed wrote: When are you people going to learn to stop feeding AJ?

i really want to hear him explain how a complex tapestery of traditions, views, languages, perceived history, perceived identity, language, etc... could possibly be genetic. if he can come up with something that doesn't involve Japanese women hating blacks, then he is a king among men (black men, not white, since it wouldn't be fair to force him to rule over a people he feels inferior to).

I haven't seen Obama done nothing but swatting flies and bring a black guy and white guy together.

He hasn't helped a bit and it's closing into 2010 soon.

At 10/8/09 05:10 PM, Eddyking wrote: I haven't seen Obama done nothing but swatting flies and bring a black guy and white guy together.

He hasn't helped a bit and it's closing into 2010 soon.

Are you basing that off the SNL sketch about him? =P

But really, when I think about Obama's presidency so far, nothing particularly sticks out that's good or bad.

Obviously he's a smart, politically savvy man and can clean up any messes he makes or pin them on his friends. But on the other hand, he's been basing his actions in too much rigid Progressive thinking. The Far-Left has been tugging at his sleeves, trying to get his ear, and it's working. Which scares me.

Now, he is my president, so I want him to succeed. I'm afraid he'll end up like Jimmy Carter, a woefully unsuccessful one-term President if he doesn't stop taking advice from polar-left figures and start talking to battle-proven political figures such as Dick Morris.

If Dick could get Bill Clinton out of the same situation Obama is in (scandal plagued and lack of public support) than following DIck Morris's advice would sure as shit benefit Obama at this crucial point in his presidency.

The whole world hates and looks down on Blacks. This is truth. Blacks are failures nearly everywhere on earth and are universally looked down upon and/or despised.

There were studies showing tat Blacks adopted by whites still fail at a greater rate than whites, AND they lack a group identity. They become fish out of water, with no intelligence OR pride to become anything.

At 10/8/09 11:16 PM, ViolentAJ wrote: The whole world hates and looks down on Blacks. This is truth.

could you at least say "most of the world/people"? cause the whole world minus one is no longer the whole world.

At 10/8/09 03:06 PM, SolInvictus wrote: i really want to hear him explain how a complex tapestery of traditions, views, languages, perceived history, perceived identity, language, etc... could possibly be genetic. if he can come up with something that doesn't involve Japanese women hating blacks, then he is a king among men (black men, not white, since it wouldn't be fair to force him to rule over a people he feels inferior to).

It's never going to happen. Because he's a troll with a gimmick. He's laughing at every single one of us so called "intellectuals" who pay attention to, or waste our time debating with him. If everyone stopped playing the game, he'd kindly disappear after the initial "bait" post.

At 10/9/09 12:05 AM, aviewaskewed wrote: It's never going to happen. Because he's a troll with a gimmick. He's laughing at every single one of us so called "intellectuals" who pay attention to, or waste our time debating with him. If everyone stopped playing the game, he'd kindly disappear after the initial "bait" post.

no having my own fun? the politics forum hasn't been offering much in the ways of decent debate lately (trolls notwithstanding).

At 10/9/09 12:07 AM, SolInvictus wrote: no having my own fun? the politics forum hasn't been offering much in the ways of decent debate lately (trolls notwithstanding).

Go ahead. I won't stop anybody. Just don't expect me to be banning this guy or doing anything about it unless he really breaks the rules, and don't get angry or agitated if he doesn't play correctly. He's like certain other folks around here, know what you're gonna get if you choose to engage him is all I'm really saying.

Obama has been trying to fix a lot of problems going on. Right now he is stressing health care. You have to remember that a President is limited by checks and balances, he is NOT a king. No matter how strong he feels about a bill or an idea, it can not get passed unless it goes through the House and the Senate first. The reason nothing has been getting accomplished is exactly that.

Big issues require big solutions. Everything is going to have to take time in order to get it right. Things will get done in due time.

At 10/8/09 11:22 PM, SolInvictus wrote:

At 10/8/09 11:16 PM, ViolentAJ wrote: The whole world hates and looks down on Blacks. This is truth.

could you at least say "most of the world/people"? cause the whole world minus one is no longer the whole world.

Fine then, the overwhelming majority of the world and its inhabitants. This will not change anytime soon, so I am going to live accordingly and base my philosophy around this fact.

At 10/9/09 03:27 AM, ViolentAJ wrote: Fine then, the overwhelming majority of the world and its inhabitants. This will not change anytime soon, so I am going to live accordingly and base my philosophy around this fact.

Given that you haven't responded to any of our counter-arguments, I am lead to believe it is more of a doctrine than a philosophy.

At 10/6/09 10:39 AM, Elfer wrote: I mean, if he exists, where's the birth certificate?

9/11 truth NOW!!!

At 10/9/09 12:15 AM, aviewaskewed wrote: Go ahead. I won't stop anybody. Just don't expect me to be banning this guy or doing anything about it unless he really breaks the rules, and don't get angry or agitated if he doesn't play correctly. He's like certain other folks around here, know what you're gonna get if you choose to engage him is all I'm really saying.

the way i see it, trolls are creative writers, i'm simply giving him a challenge to see if he is willing to put effort into his delightful creations; Newgrounds deserves a better class of troll!

but i think i'll stop since i might be driving us off topic.

but as i said: Obama is too damn media friendly. he is an actor hired to play the role of a likable politician (god knows no such thing exists).

At 10/9/09 03:27 AM, ViolentAJ wrote: Fine then, the overwhelming majority of the world and its inhabitants. This will not change anytime soon, so I am going to live accordingly and base my philosophy around this fact.

psh, and Avie said i was wasting my time.

I used to think that Obama could change the future, but now I'm starting to doubt it. (And, he wants to set terrorist prisoners free in my home country. WTF?)