Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

There would be no gender. Because the only successful lifeforms would be asexual. So... Earth'd be pretty much this huge jungle with tons of slugs and shit.

Thank god for pleasure.

PS: hypothetical situations are stupid.

Contrary to popular belief world population might actually start to decrease or slow down a little now because woman aren't having sex as much, because back in the 1500's people needed to have sex a lot and have lots of children for working.

sex feels so good because we are programmed to do it, it's biology 101. If sex didnt feel so good we wouldnt exhist.

We wouldn't have chavs.

Seems like a decent tradeoff to me.

Well...

crime would probably drop 90%.

At 9/28/09 09:31 PM, TheStonePilot wrote: What if sex didn't feel so good? What would the world be like?

Burn the non beliver!!!!!!

If sex didn't feel good, women would have absolutely no point in existing (except to have children).

If women don't have sex on their side, they have no power. Without power, women would not be able to do or say shit about test-tube babies, stem cell research, and all of the wonderful genetic enhancements we cannot have today, because some important vagina somewhere doesn't like it.

Once we can make our test-tube babies.... women will have NO purpose, and actually they wont even exist anymore.
Everyone will want a useful MALE child and not a useless female one. Since wimmenz cant say shit about genetic engineering, we can make our babies all male and useful.

Basically women would be eliminated.... Our offspring would be grown in laboratories. And the world would be a better place.

You mean like if everyone had gonorrhoea? I dno, it would probably be used my inserting sperm.

At 9/29/09 10:52 AM, GOTHCLAWZ wrote: You mean like if everyone had gonorrhoea? I dno, it would probably be used my inserting sperm.

lmao.... he didn't say if SEX BURNED LIKE FIRE lolol

a lot more women dressed like menz.

i dunno... I would imagine that if Sex didnt feel good then that was the day the whole world turned into a southern baptist congregation.

At 9/29/09 10:53 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote:

At 9/29/09 10:52 AM, GOTHCLAWZ wrote: You mean like if everyone had gonorrhoea? I dno, it would probably be used my inserting sperm.

lmao.... he didn't say if SEX BURNED LIKE FIRE lolol

You... Your sex is on fire!

At 9/28/09 09:31 PM, TheStonePilot wrote: What if sex didn't feel so good? What would the world be like?

I think Africa would be a striving utopia. Also, we'd have almost no pollution because our population would be somewhere around 200,000.

We'd still be in the medieval ages technologically though... Albert Einstein and a host of other brilliant scientists would never have existed... Let's not forget that the number of good scientists is directly proportional to the total population size. Maybe like 1 in 1 million people will make a significant contribution to science and technology (and that's a VERY conservative figure), if we only had 200, 000 people, it would take 5 generations between each major discovery... Right now, according to this rough figure we're making discoveries at a rate of 6000 per generation!

So yeah, population overcrowding has its positives. In 50 years, I wouldn't be surprised if we'd have discovered a cure for ALL major diseases and invented autonomous robots to run our economy. We have loads of new engineering professions opening up (Software, BioInformatics, Bio-engineering, etc) and the current ones are expanding rapidly.

You are a fool.
There exists a cure for every major disease.
...but a patient cured is a customer lost.

In third-world countries, a lot of the time they have lots of children so they have a force that can work enough on fields for the dying, AIDS-ridden parents.

I would go around killing people.

At 9/29/09 11:11 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: ...but a patient cured is a customer lost.

True, but then you fail to account for competition; if a company discovered a cure for cancer, then you'd bet they'd sell it to customers because they'd make a HUGE profit out of it and most importantly; they'd put the competitors out of business. The competitors won't always be able to buy them out - not if the product is truly good.

At 9/29/09 12:56 PM, Alphabit wrote:

At 9/29/09 11:11 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: ...but a patient cured is a customer lost.

True, but then you fail to account for competition; if a company discovered a cure for cancer, then you'd bet they'd sell it to customers because they'd make a HUGE profit out of it and most importantly; they'd put the competitors out of business. The competitors won't always be able to buy them out - not if the product is truly good.

The cure for cancer is found in nature everywhere, but is removed in foods consumed by human beings and animals we have domesticated. It is known as vitamin B17. The FDA has banned it long ago, and claims it does nothing in regards to cancer....

It is ILLEGAL to research and/or experiment with B17.

Why would you make something so promising ILLEGAL to research and experiment with?

It doesn't make anyone any money; That's why.

Chemo therapy.... The #1 treatment for cancer... KILLS more patients than the cancer alone. It also makes the patient's remaining life miserable.

...But the average cancer patient will spend several thousands of dollars to receive this treatment.

There is no money in the cure.
If there is money in your pocket, you are a valuable patient. Why would we want you to be cured if you can instead give us your money before you die a painful death?

B17 was researched in and found to be ineffective when combating cancer, by several groups.

At least look up your facts before you spout bullshit conspiracy theories.

Dumbasses these days...

If sex didn't feel good then the human race would cease to exist.

At 9/29/09 08:47 PM, TheStonePilot wrote: B17 was researched in and found to be ineffective when combating cancer, by several groups.

Dumbasses these days...

Several groups? Got references?
In the ONLY two documented studies conducted, b17 retarded the growth of tumors.
The only reason it was not labeled as effective is because treatment was STOPPED, and the tumor began to progress again.

If you dont take the shit until the tumor is gone of course it is going to grow again.

But don't take my word for it (someone who has done lots of original research)

You can continue to believe what you read, and bash people for exposing the truth.

Well since there is only 2 things guys think about and that is sex and fighting. Well then there would be a lot of wars and killing. our world would be in total chaos

if sex didnt feel good, i would just skate all day, then kill myself

Well, the drive would be in reproduction, instead.
Like with animals, other than dolphins.
every other animal in the species isn't that crazy over sex, but the species usually strives.

I'm pretty sure the people who have sex for the pleasure side of things are the least productive.

: So yeah, population overcrowding has its positives. In 50 years, I wouldn't be surprised if we'd have discovered a cure for ALL major diseases and invented autonomous robots to run our economy. We have loads of new engineering professions opening up (Software, BioInformatics, Bio-engineering, etc) and the current ones are expanding rapidly.

Thats exactly what they said in the 1950's and we're still all stuck here with some cock joke site and free porn everywhere.

Life is good :D

At 9/29/09 01:46 AM, YoinK wrote: we would have less songs about sex on the radio.

and alot more songs about food? lol

the world would be extinct.