Pornography or Violence

[BioEthanol]

Well Newgrounds what do you think our children should be protected more from Pornography or violence.
Currently i have to say it seems our children are being more protected from pornography. Examples are videogames are nearly always violent but almost never pornographic in nature and youtube doesn't allow porn but it does allow violence. But personally i think the main reason children are protected from pornography more is because if they weren't then they would lose some of their innocence and thats something parents consider worse than if their child was violent.
But really isnt it worse for a child to be violent than to have lost their innocence.

[WeHaveFreshCookies]

I vote we give our kids both at the same time, in a lovely song.

[Biscuit-head]

Violence definitely.
I don't want the kids to grow up pussies, but you can't kill someone with your cock.

unless you know what you're doing.

[Sidorio]

Profanity. I want my kids to grow up to be pussies.

[Lunaful]

The Rooster Teeth podcast talked about this. I suppose thats were you heard it?

[Sekhem]

Kids shouldn't be protected from anything.

[BioEthanol]

At 9/1/09 03:45 PM, Lunaful wrote: The Rooster Teeth podcast talked about this. I suppose thats were you heard it?

i have absolutely no idea what that is but i never listen to podcasts they bore me.

[PwnJobProducktion]

Pft, every kid gets into pornographic content every once in a while, intentionally or nor, but they do. As for violence, kids (Or at least me) don't gain feelings to reenact violence, it's just a bunch of mothers who find that children are complete morons and have no control over their actions, but seriously, growing up playing violent and horrific video games, watching videos of death, etc, I've never felt I should hurt, nor kill anything. I'm currently 13, and I'm a pacifist, and I believe that no one on Earth deserves to be hurt...except for George Lopez.

[Spirosgod]

They don't need to be protected from anything, seriously, there is no reason, fuck you.

[BioEthanol]

At 9/1/09 03:49 PM, Spirosgod wrote: They don't need to be protected from anything, seriously, there is no reason, fuck you.

They need to be protected from you.

[Wolfos]

porno = sex, sex = necessary for life, life = good, so what do they bitch about?
violence is exactly the opposite, tits are censored (in the US, not in my country), but they do show a gun.

[DarthRacoon]

Meh, I think they shouldn't be 'protected' from anything, sooner or later they're going to be exposed to it being it that they stumble upon porn whilst on the internet or they watch their parents stomp the fuck out of each other whilst drunk.