Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

In my opinion people shouldn't be allowe to walk around with loaded firearms even if it's in their own house because it only takes 1 accident to pull the trigger, and if you kill someone theres no bringing them back so the grief would be unimaginable. Another reason is because people get scared. They bring them onto the streets, and as soon as they get offended they pull it out and BANG!! Some wise ass is dead for something that slipped out and why? Because you couldn't control your anger. Firearms should only be allowed to be used by proper authority such as police, security, army and people like that because in hands of others it can prove to be a huge mistake. Bowling For Columbine was a good movie that brings up valid points about firearms in the possesion of civilians.

At 2/29/04 11:47 PM, VengeanceTool wrote: Bowling For Columbine was a good movie that brings up valid points about firearms in the possesion of civilians.

It was a good movie, but Michael Moore is a nut job

At 2/29/04 11:47 PM, VengeanceTool wrote: In my opinion people shouldn't be allowe to walk around with loaded firearms even if it's in their own house because it only takes 1 accident to pull the trigger, and if you kill someone theres no bringing them back so the grief would be unimaginable. Another reason is because people get scared. They bring them onto the streets, and as soon as they get offended they pull it out and BANG!! Some wise ass is dead for something that slipped out and why? Because you couldn't control your anger. Firearms should only be allowed to be used by proper authority such as police, security, army and people like that because in hands of others it can prove to be a huge mistake. Bowling For Columbine was a good movie that brings up valid points about firearms in the possesion of civilians.

do you know what the people who are permitted to carry firearms in america are considered the most law abiding group in the country?

http://www.gunowners.org/sk0701.htm

and as for the movie... it's a movie, for pete's sake. movies are tailored fot the masses, to present stuff appealing to your ears, not te truth.

At 2/29/04 07:00 PM, -gOOie- wrote: Not crying.

Hey frenchy, I thought I told you don't cry. No More Tears, gooie.

I just think a weapon in the hands of a sick person such as youself with your militant right wing ideals is a huge mistake.

Wait, I'm a sick person? It figures that filth would spew from your idiotic liberal ass. No homo, you need to worry about other people with guns, like that Muhammed fuck who was the DC sniper. God, with a name like Muhammed, you should be concerned.

I have no idea why you are talking about my balls, but I hope you blow them off with your shotgun.

Yeah, that's what would happen to you if you tried to come after me.

After this responce, you will

Um, no. I don't know what the hell that meant, but still that's for pussies.

At 3/1/04 08:44 PM, 70TA wrote:

At 2/29/04 07:00 PM, -gOOie- wrote: Not crying.

Hey frenchy, I thought I told you don't cry. No More Tears, gooie.

I just think a weapon in the hands of a sick person such as youself with your militant right wing ideals is a huge mistake.

Wait, I'm a sick person? It figures that filth would spew from your idiotic liberal ass. No homo, you need to worry about other people with guns, like that Muhammed fuck who was the DC sniper. God, with a name like Muhammed, you should be concerned.

I have no idea why you are talking about my balls, but I hope you blow them off with your shotgun.

Yeah, that's what would happen to you if you tried to come after me.

After this responce, you will

Um, no. I don't know what the hell that meant, but still that's for pussies.

Wow, I am ALMOST amazed by how blunt you are... wait, no, this is just a bunch of immature, half-baked insults that are less original than The Strokes rifts. Well, I guess you couldn't go too long without being a total homophobe. Look, you conservative pig, you don't know me, but by the looks of it, you are a spineless little prick with absolutely no opinion other than what the great and holy Fox News tells you. Every time you lose and argument, you start rambling about how the other person is gay and how we are left wing ass fuckers. Try making an argument other than "You're a fag", okay? I don't know why people constantly put up with your incompetence.

i would give you a kiss for that last statement gooie but 7OTA would call me a fag and make fun of my liberalness

At 3/1/04 09:49 PM, blueloa13 wrote: i would give you a kiss for that last statement gooie but 7OTA would call me a fag and make fun of my liberalness

lol, he would do it no matter what you did

HAHAHAHAHA! NO MORE TEARS, GOOIE!

At 3/2/04 08:05 PM, 70TA wrote: HAHAHAHAHA! NO MORE TEARS, GOOIE!

I don't want to add fuel to the flame war, but didn't you use that same comeback (ripped from Maddox's "Bill O'Reilly Is A Big Blubbering Vagina" article) in your last post?

70TA, guns kill more Americans every year than homosexuality and terrorism (your two main concerns) combined. Pretty much everyone, except pasty shitty poetry-writing goths, can agree that death is bad. And going by the Bush Doctrine that "bad things and bad and must be destroyed by force", shouldn't we eliminate weapons from this planet? They have no practical purpose other than ending the lives of humans and animals.

And if you just quote this post and write "no more tears, fag", then... well, I don't know if it's possible to lose any more respect for you than I already have, but I'll try to find a way.

At 3/2/04 08:05 PM, 70TA wrote: HAHAHAHAHA! NO MORE TEARS, GOOIE!

Wow... that was horrible...

You could at least contribute positively to this discussion, but that might be too hard for you feeble mind.

At 3/2/04 09:15 PM, -gOOie- wrote: Wow... that was horrible...

Yeah, horrible for you.

You could at least contribute positively to this discussion, but that might be too hard for you feeble mind.

Oh, and you think you're contributing positively here? Well you're not. It's too bad you're the kind of person that no one likes.

i like gooie. he's funny. and smart. and he makes you look like an idiot.

At 3/2/04 08:44 PM, OpIvy420 wrote: didn't you use that same comeback (ripped from Maddox's "Bill O'Reilly Is A Big Blubbering Vagina" article) in your last post?

No, actually it's from "A shampoo recommendation for cry-baby pussies" And it applies to you and gooie. By the way, thanks for ruining my favorite site by going there. Though it's nice to see that you get to read what Maddox wrote because it's about you and gooie.

shouldn't we eliminate weapons from this planet? They have no practical purpose other than ending the lives of humans and animals.

No. No. No. You can't just eliminate guns, and yes they do serve a purpose. Guns will never go away.

And if you just quote this post and write "no more tears, fag"

Wrong. It's more like: No More Tears, OpIvy420.

70TA, guns kill more Americans every year than homosexuality and terrorism (your two main concerns) combined. Pretty much everyone, except pasty shitty poetry-writing goths, can agree that death is bad. And going by the Bush Doctrine that "bad things and bad and must be destroyed by force", shouldn't we eliminate weapons from this planet? They have no practical purpose other than ending the lives of humans and animals.

and you suggest we get rid of guns how? by using more guns?

yeah, have the GESTAPO search american homes door to door and confiscate all weapons

does anyone find it ironic that guns enabled us to fight a revolution against the British for the freedom to discuss whether to ban guns or not?

At 3/2/04 10:13 PM, 70TA wrote: Oh, and you think you're contributing positively here? Well you're not. It's too bad you're the kind of person that no one likes.

Well, being that you are acting like a prick and starting flame wars with everyone, you are right in one sense that I am not helping the topic evolve. Speaking of evolution, you should try it. Oh, and about nobody liking me, you are wrong. It's the other way around. I don't go from page to page calling people "fags" like you do. Try being a decent human being in the future so we can start to respect you... unless you want to continue to act like Bill O'Rielly

At 3/3/04 01:14 AM, MKII wrote: does anyone find it ironic that guns enabled us to fight a revolution against the British for the freedom to discuss whether to ban guns or not?

Does anyone find it ironic that some people still want very little control on things that kill thousands of Americans a year?

At 3/3/04 01:14 AM, MKII wrote: does anyone find it ironic that guns enabled us to fight a revolution against the British for the freedom to discuss whether to ban guns or not?

LOL cause were really oppressed in Britain....
You make us seem like the Nazis.

At 3/3/04 04:10 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:

At 3/3/04 01:14 AM, MKII wrote: does anyone find it ironic that guns enabled us to fight a revolution against the British for the freedom to discuss whether to ban guns or not?

Does anyone find it ironic that some people still want very little control on things that kill thousands of Americans a year?

are you talking about guns or cars?

At 3/3/04 04:20 PM, -Jamster- wrote:

At 3/3/04 01:14 AM, MKII wrote: does anyone find it ironic that guns enabled us to fight a revolution against the British for the freedom to discuss whether to ban guns or not?

LOL cause were really oppressed in Britain....
You make us seem like the Nazis.

no offense to the british, by the way.

At 3/3/04 01:14 AM, MKII wrote: does anyone find it ironic that guns enabled us to fight a revolution against the British for the freedom to discuss whether to ban guns or not?

India also had to fight for their independence from the British, and they were able to attain it without using any guns. Ever heard of Ghandi? Non-violent protest? America wouldn't be under British rule today even if we hadn't killed thousands of English people to "be free".

At 3/3/04 07:25 PM, OpIvy420 wrote:

India also had to fight for their independence from the British, and they were able to attain it without using any guns. Ever heard of Ghandi? Non-violent protest? America wouldn't be under British rule today even if we hadn't killed thousands of English people to "be free".

you know another country that broke from britian under realatively non-violent means, Iraq

At 3/3/04 05:28 PM, MKII wrote: are you talking about guns or cars?

Guns. Cars are strictly regulated.

Amusing Fact

It is illegal to be drunk behind the wheel of a car. It is COMPLETELY legal to be drunk in possession of a firearm.

At 3/4/04 12:32 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:

At 3/3/04 05:28 PM, MKII wrote: are you talking about guns or cars?

Guns. Cars are strictly regulated.

Amusing Fact

It is illegal to be drunk behind the wheel of a car. It is COMPLETELY legal to be drunk in possession of a firearm.

depends on which stare you're in. each state has different laws. I'm assuming that you life in Conneticut?

At 3/4/04 06:16 PM, MKII wrote:

At 3/4/04 12:32 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:

At 3/3/04 05:28 PM, MKII wrote: are you talking about guns or cars?

Guns. Cars are strictly regulated.

Amusing Fact

It is illegal to be drunk behind the wheel of a car. It is COMPLETELY legal to be drunk in possession of a firearm.

depends on which stare you're in. each state has different laws. I'm assuming that you life in Conneticut?

Really? because, judging by his username (how many americans do you know say "bum"?) and his banner, he is most likely from England. Hmm, now I'm going to check his profile... well what do ya know? He IS =P

i can't find a single state that allows you to carry a firaerm while drunk.

At 3/4/04 07:36 PM, MKII wrote: i can't find a single state that allows you to carry a firaerm while drunk.

I can't find a single state that lets you marry a goat.

At 3/4/04 08:23 PM, re-dsk-unk wrote:

At 3/4/04 07:36 PM, MKII wrote: i can't find a single state that allows you to carry a firaerm while drunk.

I can't find a single state that lets you marry a goat.

Neither can I. All I found was porn. This is as close as I got,