Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

i think its good and the guy saying its like gears killzone 1 came out first so if anything gears of war copied rico

At 8/15/09 06:22 PM, TheMaster wrote: It's the god awful aiming that ruins it. Turning speed and the speed at which your crosshairs move are appallingly slow. The defend it as a feature, saying it's to simulate the weight of the guns, but it just doesn't, it just feels like sensitivity is turned down to 0 even when it's up at max.

I believe the game was alright but agree with this.

It would move slow and sensitive when you didnt want it, then fast and unreactive when you didn't want it.

Ruined the game due to frustaration.

At 8/15/09 06:22 PM, TheMaster wrote: It's the god awful aiming that ruins it. Turning speed and the speed at which your crosshairs move are appallingly slow. The defend it as a feature, saying it's to simulate the weight of the guns, but it just doesn't, it just feels like sensitivity is turned down to 0 even when it's up at max.

Yeah I think its the PS3. Metal gear online has awful sensitivity (1-2 is slow enough for guys to walk out of the crosshair yet everything above it will make you aim all over the place).

I found it to be much like the first.

Dull and unoriginal, except number 2 has got good graphics to hide alot of rubbish gameplay mechanics.

At 8/16/09 02:08 AM, AudioGmez wrote:

Hasn't that guy been banned multiple times and had hundreds of his "LOL PS3 IS CEEEEEEEEEEEWL" fuck he gives us PS3 owners a bad name.

Every time he's off his ban, he comes back to the BBS only to have his posts deleted and be banned again. Also his posts go more like this "da ps3 is da best becuz i poop in ur moms buthol and ur a gay fagot nigg"

At 8/15/09 05:10 PM, AudioGmez wrote: 1)It's a terrible game that hides behind pretty graphics.

It had pretty graphics? As a recall, it was monotone grey with some muzzle flash. I don't care how technically impressive it is, if it's monotone grey, the graphics are shit.

At 8/15/09 05:10 PM, AudioGmez wrote: 3) It calls a fucking magnum a revolver! How the fuck did every single developer miss thad?

6)Who the hell designed the guns anyway? They look like fucking toys. You'd think with all the time they put into the graphics of this game they could make one good gun.

3) It IS a revolver, you shitfuck. It dosn't matter what cartridge is loaded into it, it's still a revolver.

6) They have the same fucking guns that every other shooter has, they just look different.

Everything else you said is just a matter of opinion, really, and some of it had little to do with the actual game, but these were just stupid things to say.

Ahaha. This topic is good because of his silly little accent.

I don't know, I love it.

Even if the story is weak, the gameplay does a good job of making up for it. For example, the electricity gun.

That just made me love it right away.

At 8/15/09 11:34 PM, Gustavos wrote: Powerful handguns that shoot .45 or .50 caliber rounds.

You don't have to type out the word "caliber"...fyi.

Sorry but, just to pint out, any gun with a revolving barrel inside is technically a ravolver. magnum simple refers to the power of the pistol. Magnum refers to the class of pistol.

The Graphics are pretty good in killzone, the gameplay is good but at times it is pretty sluggish. the sprint and sights are somewhat acted out likke a retard. though the sights are abit slow, the guns are big in killzone, and i guesss that makes em slow on sight, cos real guns are(though the smg and shotgun move normal speed).

also i think the lack of story is derived the original game on ps2 basically telling you the whole story, leaving little to draw from.

i think the multiplayer is good except from the lack of classes there are, what like only 7 or 8.

oh and also, sorry but halo is just as slow as killzone but it just has more guns and bright colours.

top shooters for me would GoW2 and Cod:Waw.

Oh and guys. Reason To Jizz In Pants: MODERN WARFARE 2

You fucking idiot. You clearly didn't even play it. You have no idea what the story is about. God fucking damn it motherfucker do some research before you post.

At 8/15/09 05:10 PM, AudioGmez wrote: 1)It's a terrible game that hides behind pretty graphics.

Matter of opinion.

2)It has a bland story (mutated humans from another planet are attacking and you go on a half arsed attack on their planet.

Pay attention to the story. The Helghast are the good guys.

3) It calls a fucking magnum a revolver! How the fuck did every single developer miss thad?

*facewall*

4) Fucking terrible characters (Rico and Visari spring to mind)

Rico was annoying at points, yes.

5)It somehow makes the Helghan all sound like the same guy with a voice modulator that are SUPPOSED to be more intelligent than humans but somehow can't come out with one fucking good insult.

I think an electricity gun makes up for no insults, don't you?

5)The trophies are too easy. (Reload your gun 150 times and.... *yawn* beat this level on any difficulty.)

Complete it on the hardest difficulty. Try.

6)Who the hell designed the guns anyway? They look like fucking toys. You'd think with all the time they put into the graphics of this game they could make one good gun.

I could come up for an answer to this, but no.

7)Who were they targeting the game to? The voices sound like a kid's game but there's so much blood and swearing. (From one character by the way.)

Yes, because a game where the main antagonist's head has SS on it is a kid's game.

So yeah if you find Killzone 2 any good, why?

I would come up for a logical response, but since you were stupid enough to say, "They called a magnum a revolver!" I'm going to assume that you got killed one too many times by the rocket launcher in the multiplayer.

Eh, it was alright. Maybe because I wasnt used to a PS3 is why I thought it wasnt that good.

Visari is a terrible character? Now I am sure you're trolling.

Stop that.

At 8/15/09 05:10 PM, AudioGmez wrote: 1)It's a terrible game that hides behind pretty graphics.

That's not a reason why you hate it.

2)It has a bland story (mutated humans from another planet are attacking and you go on a half arsed attack on their planet.

Play Killzone 1 and understand the story.

3) It calls a fucking magnum a revolver! How the fuck did every single developer miss thad?

It's only a name of a gun, chill out.

4) Fucking terrible characters (Rico and Visari spring to mind)

Yeah, I agree with you there. Not all of them, what about Radec.

5)It somehow makes the Helghan all sound like the same guy with a voice modulator that are SUPPOSED to be more intelligent than humans but somehow can't come out with one fucking good insult.

They're not the same, in fact there are like 5 different ones. Similair, but not the same.

5)The trophies are too easy. (Reload your gun 150 times and.... *yawn* beat this level on any difficulty.)

(Complete the game without dying, Complete the game on Elite, get 1st rank on the multiplayer leaderboards) Yeah they are VERY easy.

6)Who the hell designed the guns anyway? They look like fucking toys. You'd think with all the time they put into the graphics of this game they could make one good gun.

How do they look like toys? They're guns.

7)Who were they targeting the game to? The voices sound like a kids game but theres so much blood and swearing. (From one charecter by the way.)

Lol, yeah. Natko swears at least 5 times in every sentence!

So yeah if you find Killzone 2 any good, why?

Too many reasons.

TL;DR
Killzone 2 is shit! If you like it why?

Whatever, your opinion...