Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

He types like he's ten.

At 6/22/09 10:07 PM, KeithHybrid wrote:

At 6/22/09 09:46 PM, ragingfred wrote: graphics are the icing on the cake.

That ain't no cake under that icing. That bit a shit sandwich.

if the the game is a cake to begin with. in this case it's the cherry on the shit sundae

the cake is a lie

At 6/22/09 11:15 PM, HWDog35 wrote: He types like he's ten.

Says the guy with "Get crunk mofos!!!!!!! HWDOG35 is here! Read my blog everyday! Must see!!! Click here if your not a fag!!!!!!!" in his signature.
But, he does.

Well I have to say GoW2 beats any old game there is.

At 6/23/09 05:35 AM, MrPercie wrote: Well I have to say GoW2 beats any old game there is.

then we will strap you to a chair and force you to watch competitive pong until someone hits one milloin points.

Jesus christ the fucking stupidity.

Plus everyone knows Gameplay < Graphics.

Why do you think pacman and mario was fun back in the day? No one cares about the "KEWL GRAFIX" it was fun and cool because of the gameplay.

Sorry i mean Gameplay > Graphics

I don't understand his argument, one minute he was ranting about story lines the next he is going on about graphics. The guy needs to relax a little i think.

Personally, I believe that graphics, gameplay, plot, and sound/music (Why does no one mention sound? It is a pretty big part in the overall game. Try to imagine going through something like Dead Space without a single noise.) all equate equally, more or less so. Dead Rising wasn't the graphic powerhouse of it's age, but gameplay and plot were excellent. I could list more but I won't. Since graphics wasn't a big priority (to my knowledge), game developers had to focus on gamplay and plot. Now they have to worry about graphics too, making them a bit less attentive on what was originally their priority.

That's just me though.

At 6/20/09 10:25 AM, MrPercie wrote: Well he is right. Old games WERE good

I agree, they were good, for their time, I mean if they made a game today with the same storyline and same graphics of a SNES or N64 game it would be shunned by game critics, whereas back then it would be praised as a great game.

That guy, Batmanthebold or some shit
Is a fucking jack-ass.
people play what they want to play
Don't get in people's faces over that kind of stuff.

The graphics don't mean shit, I would take Megaman 2 over gears of war 2 any day.
so fuck him

At 6/23/09 10:00 PM, Tribbles wrote:

At 6/20/09 10:25 AM, MrPercie wrote: Well he is right. Old games WERE good

I agree, they were good, for their time, I mean if they made a game today with the same storyline and same graphics of a SNES or N64 game it would be shunned by game critics, whereas back then it would be praised as a great game.

actually, i hear megaman 9 is doing well

At 6/22/09 06:59 AM, The-Great-One wrote: Video Games with great storylines tend to fair better, since you can continue telling a story and thus having a series like Devil May Cry, Resident Evil, Final Fantasy, heck you could even vouche that Pokemon has a great story to tell.

What this boy labeled as great games were all the overrated, yet still good, First-Person Shooters and he obviously didn't pay much attention to the stories that were going on in all of those games.

A story is important to a video game, it's what gives you the motivation to keep playing a game and beating it.

I beg to differ. The story really does nothing for me, only if the game play is fun and it's my style then I am motivated. Hell even if the instruction manual has a story that says "Once there was this guy, and you are him. You do this because he f***ing said so." I would stick to playing through the end if it was fun. Well come to think of it, story is kind of important, since it structures everything and puts you in place. Otherwise you might just go ape shit and be bored the whole time. It really depends on the type of game. The types I play (platformers, fighting, shooters) don't really need a story. All you basically do is keep going and detroy everything in your path. Story, to me, is an added bonus, granted is any good

please let me know if I made sense and you guys could understand me.

What a tard, of corse a game needs a good story regardless of graphical quailty, sure HD is nice but if there is no story it's pointless. There are tonnes of retro games lacking graphics but excelling in story and gameplay. Examples; FFVII and Metal gear solid. But also some bad grapics games with no story but epik (yes thats right with a "k") gameplay such as DoomII and Metal slug. Sure they looked like shit and had no story but fuck me they were awesome.