At 8/1/09 07:32 AM, Sekhem wrote:
At 7/31/09 05:04 PM, JingoJoe14 wrote:
I don't see why anyone would want a Console FPS over Starcraft 2. The idea just seems silly to me.
rush tactics and koreans are so fun to play online
not
at least bungie balances their game weekly
as much as i love warcraft/diablo those games are filled with cheap assholes online who ruin the game and blizzard does little about it
also lol call of duty
Being better than you doesn't make people cheap. And to say Halo 3 is balanced weekly is ridiculous. What is there to be balanced? Nobody's Spartan or Elite is different than anyone else's. Everyone runs the same speed, has the same accuracy, has the same spawns, has the same everything. The only thing left to balance are the weapons, most of which are useless.
At high level play, you'll never see anyone use the SMG, Spiker, Plasma Rifle, etc. Why? They're horrible weapons. If anything, you could argue that the game is imbalanced because of it. What fun is an FPS when only a few weapons are even viable choices? On the other hand, due to the extensive patching and balancing Blizzard did for the original Starcraft, all 3 races are completely viable and balanced at high level play.
And why would Blizzard do something about the people beating you in Starcraft/Diablo/Warcraft? Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds? People beating you doesn't ruin the game and it isn't something that needs to be patched. If winning is that important to you that it either makes or breaks a game, maybe multiplayer games are too much for you to handle. And, if you're actually beating the people who you call cheap, then Blizzard has made a game where the strategies you use and deem "not cheap" are viable, so I don't see what you're complaining about.
And I only suggested MW2 because you can also buy it on the PC.