Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I don't get it Poozy. You banned me for asking a simple question about what /thread meant. At least give me a fucking warning before you ban me for 3 days.

At 6/19/09 12:00 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

At 6/19/09 11:57 AM, Gein wrote: /thread

I don't post much anyways

Thirty days.

In the Words of Stephen Colbert.

At 6/22/09 09:57 PM, iBagel wrote: I don't get it Poozy. You banned me for asking a simple question about what /thread meant. At least give me a fucking warning before you ban me for 3 days.

I couldn't have been clearer with my ban message.

"Read a thread before you post in it. Don't be fucking lazy man. You asked a question in the "/thread" thread that was addressed several times already. -Poozy"

I banned you for being a lazy twat. If you have a question, you should try to find the answer before asking it. Especially in a thread like this one where it is very likely that other newbs asked the same question before you saw the thread.

At 6/22/09 10:55 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

I banned you for being a lazy twat. If you have a question, you should try to find the answer before asking it. Especially in a thread like this one where it is very likely that other newbs asked the same question before you saw the thread.

Still Man. That's kind of harsh...

You know what should really be banned? Posting "motivational poster" images that completely forget what they're supposed to be spoofing in the first place. Hell, even cunt punt is somewhat overused these days. Why don't we just ban users for unoriginal content? All posts must be fresh; no rehashing of old thoughts and jokes.

Anyways, I think you're just being a whiny little bitch, EyeLovePoozy.

At 6/23/09 08:26 PM, iBagel wrote:

At 6/22/09 10:55 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

I banned you for being a lazy twat. If you have a question, you should try to find the answer before asking it. Especially in a thread like this one where it is very likely that other newbs asked the same question before you saw the thread.

Still Man. That's kind of harsh...

No it isn't.

The ban I'm giving you now for complaining about a ban is harsh.

lol

Damnit Poozy! First, you come up with new rules that might actually make the NG BBS better, but then you actually try to enforce those rules? I can't believe you are working so hard to help make the BBS a better place!

It sickens me.

I love to make parody posts about idiots that complain over nothing.

At 6/19/09 12:00 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

At 6/19/09 11:57 AM, Gein wrote: /thread

I don't post much anyways

Thirty days.

Made my day.

and 30 of yours

I've learned to shut up now Poozy. Can I come out of my room now?

Hey, do you also ban when someone replies to a post, but doesn't add anything except "seconded"?

Cause, that really is nothing more than spam, and it might inspire others to do the same but with "thirded", " fourthed" and so on.

At 6/23/09 08:49 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

At 6/23/09 08:26 PM, iBagel wrote:

At 6/22/09 10:55 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

I banned you for being a lazy twat. If you have a question, you should try to find the answer before asking it. Especially in a thread like this one where it is very likely that other newbs asked the same question before you saw the thread.

Still Man. That's kind of harsh...

No it isn't.

The ban I'm giving you now for complaining about a ban is harsh.

lol

Poozy u a badddd mutha fucka.
I don't see why this thread isn't locked now, you've answered any question that's needed to know, now all it is is people complaining and shit.
What's done is done, don't try to change the mans decision.

I got cool story broed on my fucking userpage, how brutal is that?!

At 6/30/09 05:47 PM, Dobio wrote: I got cool story broed on my fucking userpage, how brutal is that?!

Isn't cool story bro also used to say something belongs on the userpage?

Well, you can delete the comment, and ban the user

On your userpage, I mean.

Or the BBS, depends on how pissed you are

At 6/30/09 05:47 PM, Dobio wrote: I got cool story broed on my fucking userpage, how brutal is that?!

Yeah, apparently from the newest, hottest user.

I mean it as in popularity, although she's a looker.

ITS ABOUT TIME! jeeze those people have been bugging me. Its completely unfair that they have gotten away with it for so long. i wish they would just /wrists XD

I've banned at least two dozen people in the past week for this, so I'm bumping this to avoid further stupidity.

NOTE:

1. This isn't up for debate.
2. Being stupid ITT will probably get you banned.
3. This is a friendly heads up bump.

How about instead of having rules, you just get someone to write a script that bans a random user for 30 days every hour?

At 4/7/10 11:30 PM, Rabid-Echidna wrote: How about instead of having rules, you just get someone to write a script that bans a random user for 30 days every hour?

What makes you so sure that I don't have such a script already in place?

Holy **** I was about to say it earlier today. I didn't even know.

I think that if any rule isn't here at least we should get a warning. Not wishing to get banned here but I think it's bullshit for users who don't know this rule. Good thing I know now.

At 4/7/10 11:32 PM, LatinoRalf wrote: Holy **** I was about to say it earlier today. I didn't even know.

I think that if any rule isn't here at least we should get a warning. Not wishing to get banned here but I think it's bullshit for users who don't know this rule. Good thing I know now.

if you would read this thread, you will notice that this is fully covered in the existing rules but is simply a tired old meme that people seem to revive and regurgitate from time to time and need a reminder that useless one word posts or presumptuous opinions on the validity of threads is already not allowed.

The rules also state to read the entirety of threads before posting in them. Had you done so you would have known all this.

At 4/7/10 11:32 PM, EyeLovePoozy wrote:

What makes you so sure that I don't have such a script already in place?

If so it's clearly not getting the job done, so I propose another solution:

Ban everyone forever.

At 4/8/10 12:07 AM, Rabid-Echidna wrote: Ban everyone forever.

We're two votes away from just deleting the BBS altogether.

standby

I'd hate to imagine what this place would be like in two years or so.

I agree with this, but...new rule?

How come when the mods spam and break the rules they don't get in trouble, and they are allowed to come up with arbitrary rules that users who have read the rules wouldn't know about unless they read the specific thread?

At 2/21/11 05:40 PM, RacistBassist wrote: How come when the mods spam and break the rules they don't get in trouble, and they are allowed to come up with arbitrary rules that users who have read the rules wouldn't know about unless they read the specific thread?

Mods can't ban other mods, and the admins don't give a fuck. Also, Poozy's the only mod who makes these stupid rules, and I doubt a new user will be banned for being ignorant of threads like these - if there are more of them. I thought this was the only one.

At 2/21/11 05:40 PM, RacistBassist wrote: How come when the mods spam and break the rules they don't get in trouble, and they are allowed to come up with arbitrary rules that users who have read the rules wouldn't know about unless they read the specific thread?

I would also like the answer to this question. I have seen mods sometimes use very rude language when talking to people on this forum and I know plenty of users who have been banned for that exact thing. "Because they are mods" isn't going to be a real answer. That is like saying a cop should be allowed to shop-lift because he is a cop.

At 6/3/09 08:41 AM, EyeLovePoozy wrote: DO NOT post "/thread" anymore.

Do you mean literally the phrase "/thread" or the word "Thread"? There are certainly a lot of those.

Are we allowed to post "/thread" if that isn't the entire post? What if we post it like so:

/thread

After a respectable post? Will we still be banned?