Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/28/09 03:26 AM, MasterJarri wrote: No Arnie, No deal...

^ this. No Arnald means no Terminator. simple as that.

No it didn't. It was different than the first ones because they're battling lots of robots. I loved watching the motorcycles getting killed. It was hilarious. I liked the whole thing. It wasn't exactly T2 but what did you expect. It was different.

Hollywood owes us one.

Superbad 2 anyone?

I just don't see what's so bad about it. If you're complaining about time paradoxes, don't watch any Terminator movies at all. Plus, they did a great job for not having the Governator. It still worked. There was a lot of action and I liked that story. More bad things get killed for a change. And I like how they tricked Marcus.

No arnie in a terminator movie=shit

I can't wait till I get it. It looks EPIC.

Stop flaming it >:(

At 5/28/09 03:10 AM, SuperSuperKLC wrote: Sucks more than all the vaccum cleaners in United States.

lulz i see what you did there.

I haven't seen the film yet, and I'm not sure if I will or not.
Probably not. It's probably crap, it doesn't even have Arnold in it, and probably has none of the original Terminator plotline concepts.

Why is it, when anyone make a good film, they have to milk it to hell??

I stopped watching these movies after part 2. So i might not be missing much

Franchise is past its use by date, it may seem.

It had amazing special effects, amazing action and semi-poor dialogue.
I don't think that makes it a horrible movie, it's not gonna with any award's for acting but it was still a enjoyable movie. And the effects were seriously amazing.

And it seems weird to me that you complain about it being a bad movie with horrible acting, and are also pissed that it doesn't have Arnold in it. Since when would having Arnold in a movie improve the acting?

At 5/28/09 03:43 PM, Foamytank wrote: Since when would having Arnold in a movie improve the acting?

Watch Terminator 1&2, then you'll know why.

I wasn't expecting much. The director primarily directs music videos...so yea.

At 5/28/09 03:49 PM, lawlmaster wrote:

At 5/28/09 03:43 PM, Foamytank wrote: Since when would having Arnold in a movie improve the acting?

Watch Terminator 1&2, then you'll know why.

I've seen all 4.
I would enjoy this one the most and the 3rd the least.

QUESTION TIME

In the film are they able to destroy the Terminators with bullets? That's what it seemed like in the trailer.

which would be bullshit btw.

At 5/28/09 03:24 AM, MercatorMap wrote:

At 5/28/09 03:22 AM, Me-Patch wrote:

At 5/28/09 03:10 AM, SuperSuperKLC wrote: Terminator 4 sucks

Well big fucking suprise that is huh?

Considering how much better the third one was, yes, it was a big fucking surprise.

The first two movies are obviously the best.

Incorrect. The first two also blow big donkey sacks.

Arnold was in it. The final terminator the fought was suppose to be another Arnold, he just didn't speak. I recall reading it in a magezine somewhere...