00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

TheADHX just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic

34,549 Views | 28 Replies

A 16-year-old student has learned the hard way that she should always pair panties with a dress - because her yearbook photo reveals a little more than she bargained for.

In the Sickles High School Yearbook is a photo making news headlines today. A 16-year who decided to skip on wearing underwear was photographed with more than just her epidermis showing.

Now thousands of copies of the yearbook have been handed out to the students who attend the high school - and while some say the private, revealed 'area' is just merely a shadow, the teen girl says it's the real thing - and it's embarrassing.

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/origin al/article_212231091.shtml

16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:50:38


At 5/19/09 03:49 PM, Armslock wrote: Whoa put them in quotes please?

crap, i thought i did. well i assure you i meant to. must have slipped my mind or i got distracted or something. eh. no harm no foul i guess.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:51:15


The uncensored pic doesn't provide!


I AM THREAD KILLER!

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:52:45


And how did they not notice this in the editing room?

More importanly should the school be charged with the distribution of child porn? Lol

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:56:44


Who goes around, let alone go to school without underwear? She can only blame herself..

Idiot.


onna site keikan/alt

«¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥» «¥»

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:56:44


Because she really wants a news story about how she got a "snatch shot"


BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:58:19


At 5/19/09 03:52 PM, BenwaHakubi wrote: And how did they not notice this in the editing room?

Maybe they're the perverts here.

The reason she gave is hardly a valid one to not wear underwear. She could've at least crossed her legs.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 15:59:35


I made a thread about this before

it got locked by some butthurt female supremacist who doesn't understand the concept of humor and jokes

GRRR MUST BE ALL SERIOUS AND LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK NO FUN 4 U

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:01:01


At 5/19/09 03:59 PM, Pounce wrote: I made a thread about this before

it got locked by some butthurt female supremacist who doesn't understand the concept of humor and jokes

GRRR MUST BE ALL SERIOUS AND LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK NO FUN 4 U

Jade?


I AM THREAD KILLER!

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:03:09


At 5/19/09 04:01 PM, Dogmeat wrote:
At 5/19/09 03:59 PM, Pounce wrote: I made a thread about this before

it got locked by some butthurt female supremacist who doesn't understand the concept of humor and jokes

GRRR MUST BE ALL SERIOUS AND LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK NO FUN 4 U
Jade?

Poozy?


BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:08:46


Wow, she didn't think of that beforehand?

Serves her right, imo. There's no reason to not wear underwear to school, besides that super special exhibitionism zing. What, was she planning to get it on with her boyfriend in the supply closet?

Idiot.


[quote]

whoa art what

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:10:01


neither are female supremacists genius

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:11:14


Damn that girl i bet gives it to anyone.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:13:45


At 5/19/09 04:08 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: There's no reason to not wear underwear to school, besides that super special exhibitionism zing.

You obviously never felt the wellness of going commando. Man, freedom!!!!

But seeing how she's seated (closed legs, not open) I sincerely doubt a lot was up for display.


RubberJournal: READY DOESN'T EVEN BEGIN TO DESCRIBE IT!

Mathematics club: we have beer and exponentials.

Cartoon club: Cause Toons>> Charlie Sheen+Raptor

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:17:15


Now hundreds of people know what her vagina looks like, what a great way to be remembered when you graduate.


BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:27:16


"To see the uncencored picture, click here."

"To see a larger version of the uncencored picture, click here."

BAHAHAHAHAHA!!
I've found a new favourite dumbass news website!

As for the girl, that was just dumb. Going commando in a short skirt is just asking for it as far as I'm concerned.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:29:29


she did it to make masturbation material for the chess club, so they'll do her homework.


PRICES SO LOW, WE'RE THROWING THEM OUT THE WINDOW!

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:32:27



PRICES SO LOW, WE'RE THROWING THEM OUT THE WINDOW!

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:34:06


Been posted before, so I'll repost my original reply.

She doesn't learn.

16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic


BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:35:15


At 5/19/09 04:03 PM, Porkchop wrote:
Poozy?

Malachy.

And I was right, she IS hot!


KILL ALL SONS A BITCHES.

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:35:40


Tender!! Why censored?? PITTY X[


Quack!

Woundersplenndin'!

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 16:39:25


At 5/19/09 03:51 PM, SuperMarioBrosS wrote: The teen girl is also a retard for saying it's a real thing instead of saying that it was a shadow. What a dumbass.

My thoughts exactly. If you say "Its just a shadowy area," then who would be there to say its not? Idiot.


Derp.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 17:01:23


Oh for the love of god don't ask for the original.

Just wait a year.....

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 17:16:48


I can understand not wearing underwear with pants on, but with a dress.. It just seems like common sense to wear something...
Oh well that's what she gets for providing easy access.


Follow my Artstigram

BBS Signature

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 17:19:03


"See the uncensored photo linked here"

LOL it's a trap!

Those idiots will log your IP if you click because she's under age.

WoW fail.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 17:21:42


Why the fuck is this is important?
I'm going to send a fuck load of CP to the newspapers and tell them to publish that.

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 17:28:32


At 5/19/09 03:56 PM, AllReligiousDrunk wrote: Who goes around, let alone go to school without underwear? She can only blame herself..

Idiot.

She said she didn't want "underwear lines" showing in the year book

welp her vag was a great substitute

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 17:33:32


It looked more like an anus to me.


'Cause it's a bittersweet symphony this life

Response to 16-year-old No Panties Yearbook Pic 2009-05-19 18:30:52


At 5/19/09 05:19 PM, katyperryy wrote: "See the uncensored photo linked here"

LOL it's a trap!

Those idiots will log your IP if you click because she's under age.

WoW fail.

Am I allowed to look if the legal age is 16 in my country?


Not my real name!

BBS Signature