At 5/2/09 11:22 PM, Jerich0 wrote:
Just wondering what you people think of that. Different way of thinking.
Interesting, but flawed.
Humans don't really 'move on' once everything around them is gone. Look at cities: they're pretty much static, and with precious little of resourceful value in them, but they stay where they are regardless.
Humans are bound by the same laws of ecological equillibrium as any other mammal. The only difference is the ability to manipulate virtually any environment and/or ecosystem to suit the requirements of the human population doing the manipulating. There's still an equillibrium - one that humanity may well be reaching the boundaries of in the not too distant future - but it has been made much less rigid thanks to things like farming and mass transport of goods and resources.
This doesn't apply to every last human on the planet; some tribes do move around certain areas depending on what's left in their current habitat. However, those people are now a rarity.