Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

iPods are probably the most annoying MP3's I've touched.

Honestly, you have to download a program just to get your music on the thing, make playlists, it only works on one computer (apparently anyway) and then sync it over.

I'd rather just grab a cheap 4GB stick-based MP3 player or a Sansa and drag-and-drop. They do their job, they're small, and they don't require you to waste time messing about with playlists and downloading programs just so you can put music on it.

At 4/23/09 04:40 PM, 1Tyla1 wrote: Honestly, you have to download a program just to get your music on the thing, make playlists, it only works on one computer (apparently anyway) and then sync it over.

I don't use iTunes, I use foobar, you don't need playlists, and I've synced mine on more than one computer and it's fine.

i gots me an ipod b/c the zune (at the time) didn't even support .wav files

At 4/22/09 10:13 PM, firehawk1220 wrote: Honestly, who would pay 200$ for an Ipod, when a decent looking one that works sells from $30 to $60.

Because I'm pretty sure that your $30-$60 MP3 player can't hold over like, 3,000 songs, play videos, movies, and games, and have a pretty good battery life. Also don't forget the iPod has really good sound and it also has a world clock, notes, you can make playlists, you can put photos on it, there's a calendar, an alarm clock, and so much more. This is just the iPod Nano. The iPod Touch is a different story....

iPods are shiny and chic.

I used to have a 1GB black Nano iPod, now saving up for the 8GB new Gen edition, simply because they play wonderful sound quality and the transfer process than window folders trying to 'Copy & Paste'.

Get and iPod and you'll know how easy it is!

Different MP3 players (that includes iPods) have different functions and feels to them.

I guess it all comes down to personnal preference in the end.

Same around here. I own a Ipod and get praise for it but my friend has a Mp4 player and people "wtf" him.